Line 174: |
Line 174: |
| *170 were low-impact (89% of GIC regulations and 52% of all regulations) | | *170 were low-impact (89% of GIC regulations and 52% of all regulations) |
| *20 were significant (11% of GIC regulations and 6% of all regulations) | | *20 were significant (11% of GIC regulations and 6% of all regulations) |
− | [[File:20171211-8370-fig01-eng.jpg|left|thumb|484x484px|'''Figure 1:''' provides an overview of the categories of regulations published between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2017. ]]<blockquote><blockquote style="background-color: white; border: solid thin grey;">During this period, 134 non-Governor in Council regulations were published, and 190 Governor in Council regulations were published. | + | [[File:20171211-8370-fig01-eng.jpg|thumb|484x484px|'''Figure 1:''' provides an overview of the categories of regulations published between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2017. |alt=|center]]<blockquote><blockquote style="background-color: white; border: solid thin grey;">During this period, 134 non-Governor in Council regulations were published, and 190 Governor in Council regulations were published. |
| Of the 190 Governor in Council regulations, 170 were low-impact regulations, and 20 were medium- or high-impact regulations, also known as significant regulations. | | Of the 190 Governor in Council regulations, 170 were low-impact regulations, and 20 were medium- or high-impact regulations, also known as significant regulations. |
| | | |
Line 187: |
Line 187: |
| *2 had monetized costs only | | *2 had monetized costs only |
| | | |
− | [[File:20171211-8370-fig02-eng.jpg|left|thumb|'''Figure 2:''' depicts the net benefit of significant regulations published between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2017.]]<blockquote><blockquote style="background-color: white; border: solid thin grey;">The total cost associated with significant regulations was $7.0 billion. | + | [[File:20171211-8370-fig02-eng.jpg|thumb|'''Figure 2:''' depicts the net benefit of significant regulations published between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2017.|alt=|center]]<blockquote><blockquote style="background-color: white; border: solid thin grey;">The total cost associated with significant regulations was $7.0 billion. |
| The total benefit associated with significant regulations was $16.6 billion. | | The total benefit associated with significant regulations was $16.6 billion. |
| | | |
Line 376: |
Line 376: |
| The regulation removing the most regulatory burden in the 2016 to 2017 fiscal year was the [https://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2016/2016-11-30/html/sor-dors298-eng.html Regulations Amending the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (Skilled Worker)]. This regulation reduced administrative burden to businesses by $1.2 million per year by removing the requirement for some employers to request a Labour Market Impact Assessment from Employment and Social Development Canada in order for their temporary foreign worker employees to qualify for arranged employment. | | The regulation removing the most regulatory burden in the 2016 to 2017 fiscal year was the [https://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2016/2016-11-30/html/sor-dors298-eng.html Regulations Amending the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (Skilled Worker)]. This regulation reduced administrative burden to businesses by $1.2 million per year by removing the requirement for some employers to request a Labour Market Impact Assessment from Employment and Social Development Canada in order for their temporary foreign worker employees to qualify for arranged employment. |
| | | |
− | [[File:20171211-8370-fig03-eng.jpg|left|thumb|Figure 3 provides statistics on the implementation of the One-for-One Rule for significant regulations published between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2017.]]<blockquote><blockquote style="background-color: white; border: solid thin grey;">There were 2 new regulatory titles added to the regulatory stock and 16 regulatory titles repealed, for a net of 14 fewer regulations in the regulatory stock. | + | [[File:20171211-8370-fig03-eng.jpg|thumb|Figure 3 provides statistics on the implementation of the One-for-One Rule for significant regulations published between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2017.|alt=|center]]<blockquote><blockquote style="background-color: white; border: solid thin grey;">There were 2 new regulatory titles added to the regulatory stock and 16 regulatory titles repealed, for a net of 14 fewer regulations in the regulatory stock. |
| There were 9 instances where regulations were exempted from the One-for-One Rule, including 4 emergency or crisis situations, 2 exemptions for tax and tax administration, and 3 non-discretionary obligations. | | There were 9 instances where regulations were exempted from the One-for-One Rule, including 4 emergency or crisis situations, 2 exemptions for tax and tax administration, and 3 non-discretionary obligations. |
| | | |