Changes

User:Diversity & Inclusion in Action - event summary (view source)

Revision as of 10:42, 21 January 2022

70 bytes removed , 10:42, 21 January 2022

Line 172: Line 172:

.

−

Question 6. ~~– Organizers had expected this~~ to ~~be one~~ of ~~the most straightforward questions but it unfortunately yielded mixed results.~~

+

'''Question 6. What do you think management should do to promote retention of diverse employees?'''

−

~~– There seemed to be a misunderstanding about what the VMWG is and what they can do~~

+

''Subgroup Observations''

−

~~– A key takeaway here would be~~ to ~~spend some time defining the VMWG and the scope of the work we can do~~

+

- This question yielded mixed results as many answers unsure how to answer

−

~~– I think we should visit why this question yielded such mixed results, i.e. was it~~ an issue ~~of understanding~~ the ~~VMWG or was it more attributed to~~ way the question was structured

+

- Responses identified the need for the greater clarity and communication on the mandate and mission statement of the Visible Minority Working Group

+

- The subgroup also considered that there may have been an issue in the way the question was structured and that lead to confusion

+

- Responses that fell with the Working Group's scope of work focused on hiring and retention and training for supervisors and senior managers

−

~~– That being said, responses that seemed more within the scope of what the VMWG can do did seemed to center on respondents did seem to center on training supervisors/senior managers~~

Taiwo.lewis

570

edits