570
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 172:
Line 172: − + − – There seemed to be a misunderstanding about what the VMWG is and what they can do+ − – A key takeaway here would be to spend some time defining the VMWG and the scope of the work we can do+ − – I think we should visit why this question yielded such mixed results, i.e. was it an issue of understanding the VMWG or was it more attributed to way the question was structured+ + + + + − – That being said, responses that seemed more within the scope of what the VMWG can do did seemed to center on respondents did seem to center on training supervisors/senior managers
User:Diversity & Inclusion in Action - event summary (view source)
Revision as of 10:42, 21 January 2022
, 10:42, 21 January 2022→EVENT SURVEY
.
.
Question 6. – Organizers had expected this to be one of the most straightforward questions but it unfortunately yielded mixed results.
'''Question 6. What do you think management should do to promote retention of diverse employees?'''
''Subgroup Observations''
- This question yielded mixed results as many answers unsure how to answer
- Responses identified the need for the greater clarity and communication on the mandate and mission statement of the Visible Minority Working Group
- The subgroup also considered that there may have been an issue in the way the question was structured and that lead to confusion
- Responses that fell with the Working Group's scope of work focused on hiring and retention and training for supervisors and senior managers
