Changes

Example 1: <pre>Record 1 comes from LAC and has a 016 field but is not RDA compliant; record 2 comes from BAnQ and is RDA compliant. Record 1 from LAC is retained because criteria 1 and 2 have priority over criterion 4.</pre>

Example 1: <pre>Record 1 comes from LAC and has a 016 field but is not RDA compliant; record 2 comes from BAnQ and is RDA compliant. Record 1 from LAC is retained because criteria 1 and 2 have priority over criterion 4.</pre>

Example 2: <pre>Record 1 comes from BAnQ and is not RDA compliant; record 2 comes from a university but is RDA compliant and more complete. Record 1 from BAnQ is retained because criterion 3 has priority over criteria 4 and 5.</pre>

Example 2: <pre>Record 1 comes from BAnQ and is not RDA compliant; record 2 comes from a university but is RDA compliant and more complete. Record 1 from BAnQ is retained because criterion 3 has priority over criteria 4 and 5.</pre>

Example 3: <pre>La notice 1 vient d'une université et n'est pas RDA; la notice 2 vient d'une autre université mais est RDA quoique moins complète. La notice 2 est conservée car le critère 4 a priorité sur le critère 5.</pre>

Example 3: <pre>Record 1 comes from a university and is not RDA compliant; record 2 comes from another university but is RDA compliant although less complete. Record 2 is retained because criterion 4 has priority over criterion 5.</pre>

</div>

</div>