Important: The GCConnex decommission will not affect GCCollab or GCWiki. Thank you and happy collaborating!
Difference between revisions of "CRI Supported Projects"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sarah.faulds (talk | contribs) m |
Sarah.faulds (talk | contribs) m |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<big>'''<u>Completed CRI Supported Projects</u>'''</big> | <big>'''<u>Completed CRI Supported Projects</u>'''</big> | ||
− | The following are completed projects that were supported by the CRI’s Regulators’ Capacity Fund ([[:en:Regulators'_Capacity_Fund|RCF]]) or Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund ([[:en:Regulatory_Experimentation_Expense_Fund|REEF]]). | + | The following are '''completed''' '''projects''' that were supported by the CRI’s Regulators’ Capacity Fund ([[:en:Regulators'_Capacity_Fund|RCF]]) or Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund ([[:en:Regulatory_Experimentation_Expense_Fund|REEF]]). If you are interested in any of the final project reports or contacting any of the project leads, please reach out to the CRI at [mailto:cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca?Subject=GCpedia%20General%20enquiry%20&body=%20 cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca]. |
− | (If you are interested in seeing a list of ongoing projects, please click either REEF or RCF and scroll to the table at the bottom of the page) | + | (If you are interested in seeing a list of '''ongoing projects''', please click either [[:en:Regulatory_Experimentation_Expense_Fund|REEF]] or [[:en:Regulators'_Capacity_Fund|RCF]] and scroll to the table at the bottom of the page) |
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
*The experiment as proposed by CB involves testing whether a created IT tool could help the Competition Bureau to leverage various sources of publicly available information to more efficiently and effectively identify anticompetitive mergers that may be avoiding antitrust scrutiny in Canada because they are not caught by the current regulatory regime for mandatory pre-merger notification. | *The experiment as proposed by CB involves testing whether a created IT tool could help the Competition Bureau to leverage various sources of publicly available information to more efficiently and effectively identify anticompetitive mergers that may be avoiding antitrust scrutiny in Canada because they are not caught by the current regulatory regime for mandatory pre-merger notification. | ||
+ | '''<big>Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)</big>''' | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | 🔹 <big><u>[[:en:images/5/56/EN-_REEF_Experimentation_Report_-_ECCC_Testing_a_policy_lab_co-creation_approach_to_the_development_of_policy_solutions.pdf|Testing a policy lab co-creation approach to the development of policy solutions]]</u></big> | ||
+ | |||
+ | *This experiment as proposed by ECCC involves using a policy lab approach to engage Canadian stakeholders in co-developing new solutions to enhance supply chain transparency (SCT) for chemicals, in addition to developing recommendations for consumer labelling. Using a policy lab model is a novel approach for ECCC and the experiment is to test whether this approach can enhance the policy outcomes in the context of a complex issue affecting a regulatory program and implicating many industries and stakeholders. | ||
'''<big>Innovation Science and Economic Development (ISED)</big>''' | '''<big>Innovation Science and Economic Development (ISED)</big>''' | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 50: | Line 55: | ||
*ISED proposed to partner with the Digital Identity Laboratory, an independent Canadian not-for-profit entity dedicated to providing services to the public and private sectors, to develop and pilot the bilingual digital credential educational approaches with regulators and other interested organizations. The objective of the experiment was to determine the best approach to increase trainees’ proficiencies and knowledge of Digital credentials and obtain information on how the training affects trainees buy-in toward this technology. | *ISED proposed to partner with the Digital Identity Laboratory, an independent Canadian not-for-profit entity dedicated to providing services to the public and private sectors, to develop and pilot the bilingual digital credential educational approaches with regulators and other interested organizations. The objective of the experiment was to determine the best approach to increase trainees’ proficiencies and knowledge of Digital credentials and obtain information on how the training affects trainees buy-in toward this technology. | ||
+ | '''<big>Transport Canada (TC)</big>''' | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | 🔹 <big><u>[[:en:images/a/a0/REEF_Experimentation_Report_-_TC_Electronic_Personnel_Licence.pdf|Electronic Personnel Licence]]</u></big> | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Transport Canada implemented improvements to its information technology infrastructures and created a central licencing data repository creating the foundation necessary to support an Electronic Personnel Licence (EPL). Transport Canada also developed a prototype web based EPL that users can log into using GC Key to access a digital representation of their Transport Canada licensing information. | ||
|} | |} | ||
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" | {| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" | ||
Line 68: | Line 78: | ||
*The project involves researching the regulatory barriers impacting agricultural biogas project development, highlighting necessary guidance or regulatory alignment needs, and identifying potential tools to aid SMEs in navigating regulations to enable them to achieve environmental and economic goals. It will also clarify if there is a role for the federal government to create a Pan-Canadian regulatory pathway for the agricultural biogas sector. | *The project involves researching the regulatory barriers impacting agricultural biogas project development, highlighting necessary guidance or regulatory alignment needs, and identifying potential tools to aid SMEs in navigating regulations to enable them to achieve environmental and economic goals. It will also clarify if there is a role for the federal government to create a Pan-Canadian regulatory pathway for the agricultural biogas sector. | ||
+ | 🔹 <big><u>Co-Development Approach to Seed Regulatory Modernization</u></big> <small>(no report or case study available)</small> | ||
− | + | * This project seeks to co-develop modernized seed regulations from consensus-based, impartial recommendations derived from discussions with stakeholders, as well as accurately assess the cumulative economic impacts of the regulatory amendments. | |
− | |||
− | *This project seeks to co-develop modernized seed regulations from consensus-based, impartial recommendations derived from discussions with stakeholders, as well as accurately assess the cumulative economic impacts of the regulatory amendments. | ||
🔹 [[:en:images/1/18/EN-_AAFC_3_Plant_Breeders’_Rights_Act_UPOV’91_Impact_Study.pdf|<big><u>Plant Breeders’ Rights Act/UPOV’91 Impact Study</u></big>]] | 🔹 [[:en:images/1/18/EN-_AAFC_3_Plant_Breeders’_Rights_Act_UPOV’91_Impact_Study.pdf|<big><u>Plant Breeders’ Rights Act/UPOV’91 Impact Study</u></big>]] | ||
Line 82: | Line 91: | ||
'''<big>Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC)</big>''' | '''<big>Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC)</big>''' | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | 🔹 <big><u> | + | 🔹 <big>[[:en:images/e/e9/A_Study_for_the_Canadian_Nuclear_Safety_Commission_on_Artificial_Intelligence_Applications_and_Implications_for_the_Nuclear_Industry.pdf|<u>A Study for the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Implications for the Nuclear Industry</u>]]</big> |
− | + | *This project involves contracting expert advisory services to conduct a literature study and evaluation of the information required to demonstrate the safety of the use of AI in licensed nuclear activities, evaluate potential challenges for regulatory oversight and its use by regulators in inspection and compliance programs. | |
− | *This project involves contracting expert advisory services to | ||
− | |||
🔹 [[:en:images/7/71/EN-_CNSC_1-_Support_to_enable_improved_costing_of_nuclear_regulations_and_increase_internal_regulations_costing_capability.pdf|<big><u>Support to enable improved costing of nuclear regulations and increase internal regulations costing capability</u></big>]] | 🔹 [[:en:images/7/71/EN-_CNSC_1-_Support_to_enable_improved_costing_of_nuclear_regulations_and_increase_internal_regulations_costing_capability.pdf|<big><u>Support to enable improved costing of nuclear regulations and increase internal regulations costing capability</u></big>]] | ||
Line 125: | Line 132: | ||
*The project aims to develop and implement a Regulatory Discovery Tool to improve access to information on federal regulations. This involves conducting consultations to identify the needs of regulators and stakeholders, identifying and collecting regulatory metadata, and ultimately developing a public-facing, web-based, searchable Tool. | *The project aims to develop and implement a Regulatory Discovery Tool to improve access to information on federal regulations. This involves conducting consultations to identify the needs of regulators and stakeholders, identifying and collecting regulatory metadata, and ultimately developing a public-facing, web-based, searchable Tool. | ||
+ | 🔹 <big><u>[[:en:images/2/2a/ECCC-_Regulatory_Standardization_and_Rules_as_Code_Research_Project.pdf|Regulatory Standardization and Rules as Code Research Project]]</u></big> | ||
+ | *This project aimed to analyze ECCC’s regulations and regulatory reports to develop a template and methodology for new regulations and associated reporting requirements with the intent of standardizing terminology and requirements. It also proposed to develop criteria to determine which regulations are suitable for rules as code (RAC) and ways to incorporate RAC principles in the drafting of regulations. | ||
'''<big>Health Canada (HC)</big>''' | '''<big>Health Canada (HC)</big>''' | ||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 15:27, 23 August 2023
Completed CRI Supported Projects
Home | Events | What is Regulatory Experimentation? | Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund | Regulators' Capacity Fund | Completed CRI Supported Projects | Tools and Resources |
---|
Completed CRI Supported Projects
The following are completed projects that were supported by the CRI’s Regulators’ Capacity Fund (RCF) or Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund (REEF). If you are interested in any of the final project reports or contacting any of the project leads, please reach out to the CRI at cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca.
(If you are interested in seeing a list of ongoing projects, please click either REEF or RCF and scroll to the table at the bottom of the page)
Contents
- REEF Experimentation Reports
- RCF Case Studies
(Project names are hyperlinked to their RCF case study or REEF experimentation report, as applicable)
Expand
REEF Experimentation Reports |
---|
Expand
RCF Case Studies |
---|