Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 163: Line 163:  
''Subgroup Observations''
 
''Subgroup Observations''
   −
- Generally a relatively tepid tone towards the Department’s performance fostering an equitable workspace
+
- Generally a relatively tepid tone towards the Department’s performance in fostering an equitable workspace
   −
- Many respondents noted that while the Department is diverse in its makeup, it is falling short on issues of  equity
+
- Many respondents noted that while the Department is diverse in its makeup, it is falling short on issues of equity
   −
- A number of respondents made a distinction between advancement opportunities for Indigenous employees versus those offered to visible minority employees, and cited a need for greater Indigenous representation at senior levels of management.
+
- A number of respondents made a distinction between advancement opportunities for Indigenous employees versus those offered to visible minorities, and cited a need for greater Indigenous representation at senior levels of management.
      Line 174: Line 174:  
''Subgroup Observations''
 
''Subgroup Observations''
   −
- Fairly balanced response and reflect the results from question 2   
+
- Fairly balanced response that reflects the results from question 2   
    
- Respondents did not necessarily perceive hiring as the problem, more so retention.
 
- Respondents did not necessarily perceive hiring as the problem, more so retention.
Line 191: Line 191:  
''Subgroup Observations''
 
''Subgroup Observations''
   −
- This question yielded mixed results as many answers unsure how to answer  
+
- This question yielded mixed results as many respondents were unsure how to answer  
    
- Responses identified the need for the greater clarity and communication on the mandate and mission statement of the Visible Minority Working Group
 
- Responses identified the need for the greater clarity and communication on the mandate and mission statement of the Visible Minority Working Group
   −
- The subgroup also considered that there may have been an issue in the way the question was structured and that lead to confusion
+
- The subgroup also considered that the way the question was worded may have lead to confusion
   −
- Responses that fell with the Working Group's scope of work focused on hiring and retention and training for supervisors and senior managers.
+
- Responses that fell within the Working Group's scope of work focused on hiring, retention of visible minorities and training for supervisors and senior managers.
     
570

edits

Navigation menu

GCwiki