110
edits
Important: The GCConnex decommission will not affect GCCollab or GCWiki. Thank you and happy collaborating!
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 109:
Line 109: + + + + − + +
Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund (view source)
Revision as of 14:48, 21 January 2022
, 14:48, 21 January 2022no edit summary
|-
|-
| Transport Canada (TC)
| Transport Canada (TC)
| Piloting an Accreditation Program for the Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS)
| This experiment involves setting up a sandbox to determine if Light Sport Aircraft, with appropriate conditions, are as reliable as other aircraft currently being used for the purpose of flight training and if the quality of training is as good, or better, than other aircraft currently used for pilot training. The experiment will also inform Transport Canada on potential additional conditions/measures that should be included in future exemptions or regulatory amendments.
|-
| Innovation Science and Economic Development (ISED) – Standards Council of Canada (SCC)
| Light Sport Aircraft
| Light Sport Aircraft
| This experiment involves setting up a sandbox to determine if Light Sport Aircraft, with appropriate conditions, are as reliable as other aircraft currently being used for the purpose of flight training and if the quality of training is as good, or better, than other aircraft currently used for pilot training. The experiment will also inform Transport Canada on potential additional conditions/measures that should be included in future exemptions or regulatory amendments.
| The purpose of this experiment is to pilot a prototype accreditation program to understand whether the main SCC Requirements and Guidance document that works in conjunction with ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Conformity assessment is clear and appropriate and obtain feedback from the certification bodies and Artificial Intelligence (AI) companies about the program. This information is necessary to improve and refine the prototype.
The SCC is also looking to gather information on whether the AIMS could have an impact on the level of risk of AI products to inform potential use of AIMS for regulators.
|}
|}
