439
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 36:
Line 36: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Designing Public Engagements/Mighty team of one (view source)
Revision as of 13:19, 26 July 2018
, 13:19, 26 July 2018→Activity 1 - People
Image Description: Completed example of Activity 1. People or groups have been written on sticky notes and placed into quadrants based on their position along the horizontal axis of affectedness and the vertical axis of influence. In the top left low-affected high-influence quadrant are Heath Canada and the Grocery Trade Association. In the top right high-affectedness high-influence quadrant are sticky notes for Provincial Governments and Soft Drink Manufacturers. In the bottom right high-affectedness low-influence quadrant are citizens, and the final quadrant of low-affectedness low-influence is empty.
Image Description: Completed example of Activity 1. People or groups have been written on sticky notes and placed into quadrants based on their position along the horizontal axis of affectedness and the vertical axis of influence. In the top left low-affected high-influence quadrant are Heath Canada and the Grocery Trade Association. In the top right high-affectedness high-influence quadrant are sticky notes for Provincial Governments and Soft Drink Manufacturers. In the bottom right high-affectedness low-influence quadrant are citizens, and the final quadrant of low-affectedness low-influence is empty.
Description
Activity 2 helps you define the Context in which your engagement will take place. Understanding the deeper context for different people involved in the issue is will help you design engagement for different people’s needs.
===Instructions===
Note that you may need to print multiple copies of this activity page if you have many people involved in the issue, or, you may wish to start with just a few key people or groups.
Use past engagements or research such as surveys, interviews or published position papers to inform your decisions for Activity 2. If you cannot make Context ratings for all People involved, you may wish to do research before moving forward.
Assign each person or group identified in Activity 1 a symbol (e.g. star, spiral, square) and place it next to their name on the space provided. You can, if you wish, ask members of your team to role play representing the persons or groups chosen. This can help ensure you have a strong grasp on the perspectives of different people involved in the issue.
Use the following prompts to rate where each person or group falls on the continuum of left (low, negative, poor) to right (high, positive, good) and then mark each with their chosen symbol.
Awareness of the issue
* What is the quality of People’s information?
* Are they knowledgeable about the trade-off?
Relationship with government
* Is there an existing relationship?
* What is the level of trust they have?
* Are they open to collaboration with us?
Confidence in system
* People’s perceived integrity of government?
Image Description: Completed example of Activity 2. A top portion of Activity 2 is meant for you to choose a selection of People or Groups to focus on and bottom section includes a list of three consideration areas on the left and a horizontal continuum to rate each Person or Group on the right. For our example a sub-selection of people has been chosen, and includes Citizens as the affected party, Soft Drink Manufacturers as the influencer party, and Provincial Government as the partner party. Citizens have been given a heart at their identifying symbol, Soft Drink manufactures a spiral, and Provincial Government a start. Each symbol has been placed on the left-to-right continuum which reflect a less-to-more or negative-to-positive continuum for each of the three consideration areas of Awareness of Issue, Relationship with Government, and Confidence in System. Citizens were rated just to the left of centre, just to the right of centre, and directly on centre for each consideration for awareness, relationship, and confidence, respectively. Soft drink manufacturers were rated between centre and the right pole, halfway between centre and the left pole, and just right of centre. Provincial Government was rated almost all the way to the right pole, slightly left of centre, and on centre.
[[FR:Elaboration d’experiences de mobilisation du public/Une équipe formidable d'une]]
[[FR:Elaboration d’experiences de mobilisation du public/Une équipe formidable d'une]]
