Important: The GCConnex decommission will not affect GCCollab or GCWiki. Thank you and happy collaborating!

Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Technology Trends/Low Code Application Development (view source)

Revision as of 14:06, 17 July 2019

7,649 bytes added ,  14:06, 17 July 2019
no edit summary
Line 115: Line 115:  
   <p class="inline">All of the major technical industry analysts (Forrester, Gartner, Ovum, and IDC) have reported on low-code for a number of years – following Forrester naming it “low-code” in 2014. Those reports have at times identified up to fifty providers of low-code environments over the past decade. Some of those providers have faded, while three have emerged as the leading providers of very broad low-code solutions</p><p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content"> (A broad solution is one able to interface to many other types of components (both legacy or written in other programming languages), runs on several platforms, is able to produce apps of all types.)</p><p class="inline"> : Mendix (now a part of Siemens), Microsoft (with PowerApps), and OutSystems. The Forrester Wave from March 2019 is shown in Figure 1, while the 2018 Gartner Magic Quadrant is shown in Figure 2.
 
   <p class="inline">All of the major technical industry analysts (Forrester, Gartner, Ovum, and IDC) have reported on low-code for a number of years – following Forrester naming it “low-code” in 2014. Those reports have at times identified up to fifty providers of low-code environments over the past decade. Some of those providers have faded, while three have emerged as the leading providers of very broad low-code solutions</p><p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content"> (A broad solution is one able to interface to many other types of components (both legacy or written in other programming languages), runs on several platforms, is able to produce apps of all types.)</p><p class="inline"> : Mendix (now a part of Siemens), Microsoft (with PowerApps), and OutSystems. The Forrester Wave from March 2019 is shown in Figure 1, while the 2018 Gartner Magic Quadrant is shown in Figure 2.
   −
      <div class="container">
+
  <div class="container">
−
          <div class="row">
+
    <div class="row">
−
            <div class="col-sm-4">
+
      <div class="col-sm-4">
−
              [[File:Technology_Trends_-_Low_Code_Application_Development_Forrester_Wave.png|center]]
+
        [[File:Technology_Trends_-_Low_Code_Application_Development_Forrester_Wave.png|center]]
−
     
+
 
−
              <p class="source">Figure 1 The Forrester Wave: Low-Code Development Platforms for AD&D Professionals, Q1 2019. Used without permission.</p>
+
        <p class="source">Figure 1 The Forrester Wave: Low-Code Development Platforms for AD&D Professionals, Q1 2019. Used without permission.</p>
−
            </div>
+
      </div>
−
            <div class="col-sm-8">
+
      <div class="col-sm-8">
−
              <table class="wikitable hypecycleTable">
+
        <table class="wikitable hypecycleTable">
−
                <tr>
+
          <tr>
−
                  <th>English</th>
+
            <th>English</th>
−
                  <th>Français</th>
+
            <th>Français</th>
−
                </tr>
+
          </tr>
−
                <tr>
+
          <tr>
−
                  <td>Figure 1. Hype Cycle Report for UAVs and Mobile Robots, 2018</td>
+
            <td>Challengers</td>
−
                  <td>Figure 1. Rapport Hype Cycle pour les drones et les robots mobiles, 2018</td>
+
            <td>Nouveaux fournisseurs</td>
−
                </tr>
+
          </tr>
−
              </table>
+
          <tr>
−
            </div>
+
            <td>Contenders</td>
−
          </div>
+
            <td>Fournisseurs concurrents</td>
−
        </div>
+
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Strong Performers</td>
 +
            <td>Fournisseurs performants</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Leaders</td>
 +
            <td>Chefs de file</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Stronger current offering</td>
 +
            <td>Offres actuelles les plus intéressantes</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Weaker current offering</td>
 +
            <td>Offres actuelles les moins intéressantes</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Weaker strategy</td>
 +
            <td>Stratégie plus faible</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Stronger strategy</td>
 +
            <td>Stratégie plus solide</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Market presence</td>
 +
            <td>Présence sur le marché</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>OutSystems</td>
 +
            <td>OutSystems</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Mendix</td>
 +
            <td>Mendix</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Kony</td>
 +
            <td>Kony</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Microsoft</td>
 +
            <td>Microsoft</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Salesforce</td>
 +
            <td>Salesforce</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>ServiceNow</td>
 +
            <td>ServiceNow</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>GeneXus</td>
 +
            <td>GeneXus</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Progress Software</td>
 +
            <td>Progress Software</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>WaveMaker</td>
 +
            <td>WaveMaker</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>MatsSoft</td>
 +
            <td>MatsSoft</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Thinkwise</td>
 +
            <td>Thinkwise</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Skuid</td>
 +
            <td>Skuid</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Clear Software</td>
 +
            <td>Clear Software</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
        </table>
 +
      </div>
 +
    </div>
 +
  </div>
    
   <p>Among other requirements, the systems featured in the Forrester Wave were chosen because they each:
 
   <p>Among other requirements, the systems featured in the Forrester Wave were chosen because they each:
Line 147: Line 231:     
   <p>Websites of the low-code tool leaders typically provide reference customers, and these include numerous prominent banks, insurance companies, airlines, government departments, and the US Army – though in most cases no details are given about the precise application domain. Most of the analysts’ reports, as well as self-reporting by OutSystems and Mendix, indicate that 88% of companies are adopting low-code, while 74% of those companies are integrating the business side into low-code development, thereby directly involving the clients who dictate the requirements .</p>
 
   <p>Websites of the low-code tool leaders typically provide reference customers, and these include numerous prominent banks, insurance companies, airlines, government departments, and the US Army – though in most cases no details are given about the precise application domain. Most of the analysts’ reports, as well as self-reporting by OutSystems and Mendix, indicate that 88% of companies are adopting low-code, while 74% of those companies are integrating the business side into low-code development, thereby directly involving the clients who dictate the requirements .</p>
 +
 +
  <div class="container">
 +
    <div class="row">
 +
      <div class="col-sm-4">
 +
        [[File:Technology_Trends_-_Low_Code_Application_Development_Gartner_Magic_Quadrant.png|center]]
 +
 +
        <p class="source">Figure 1 The Forrester Wave: Low-Code Development Platforms for AD&D Professionals, Q1 2019. Used without permission.</p>
 +
      </div>
 +
      <div class="col-sm-8">
 +
        <table class="wikitable hypecycleTable">
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <th>English</th>
 +
            <th>Français</th>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Challengers</td>
 +
            <td>Nouveaux fournisseurs</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Contenders</td>
 +
            <td>Fournisseurs concurrents</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Strong Performers</td>
 +
            <td>Fournisseurs performants</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Leaders</td>
 +
            <td>Chefs de file</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Stronger current offering</td>
 +
            <td>Offres actuelles les plus intéressantes</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Weaker current offering</td>
 +
            <td>Offres actuelles les moins intéressantes</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Weaker strategy</td>
 +
            <td>Stratégie plus faible</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Stronger strategy</td>
 +
            <td>Stratégie plus solide</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Market presence</td>
 +
            <td>Présence sur le marché</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>OutSystems</td>
 +
            <td>OutSystems</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Mendix</td>
 +
            <td>Mendix</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Kony</td>
 +
            <td>Kony</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Microsoft</td>
 +
            <td>Microsoft</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Salesforce</td>
 +
            <td>Salesforce</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>ServiceNow</td>
 +
            <td>ServiceNow</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>GeneXus</td>
 +
            <td>GeneXus</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Progress Software</td>
 +
            <td>Progress Software</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>WaveMaker</td>
 +
            <td>WaveMaker</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>MatsSoft</td>
 +
            <td>MatsSoft</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Thinkwise</td>
 +
            <td>Thinkwise</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Skuid</td>
 +
            <td>Skuid</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Clear Software</td>
 +
            <td>Clear Software</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
        </table>
 +
      </div>
 +
    </div>
 +
  </div>
    
   <h2>Canadian Government Use</h2>
 
   <h2>Canadian Government Use</h2>
Line 162: Line 352:     
   <p>Analyst group IDG and OutSystems have specifically explored OutSystems for digital government, basing their evaluation on the goals shown in Figure 3, though the conclusions are valid for all low-code systems. In particular, low-code can simultaneously increase quality while decreasing service delivery costs.</p>
 
   <p>Analyst group IDG and OutSystems have specifically explored OutSystems for digital government, basing their evaluation on the goals shown in Figure 3, though the conclusions are valid for all low-code systems. In particular, low-code can simultaneously increase quality while decreasing service delivery costs.</p>
 +
 +
  <div class="container">
 +
    <div class="row">
 +
      <div class="col-sm-4">
 +
        [[File:Technology_Trends_-_Low_Code_Application_Development_Top_Goals.png|center]]
 +
 +
        <p class="source">Figure 3 Top Goals with Respect to the Digital Experience Provided for Citizens. Used without permission from: Improving Digital Experience for End Users in the Public Sector, IDG Research Services, December 2018.</p>
 +
      </div>
 +
      <div class="col-sm-8">
 +
        <table class="wikitable hypecycleTable">
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <th>English</th>
 +
            <th>Français</th>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Challengers</td>
 +
            <td>Nouveaux fournisseurs</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Contenders</td>
 +
            <td>Fournisseurs concurrents</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Strong Performers</td>
 +
            <td>Fournisseurs performants</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Leaders</td>
 +
            <td>Chefs de file</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Stronger current offering</td>
 +
            <td>Offres actuelles les plus intéressantes</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Weaker current offering</td>
 +
            <td>Offres actuelles les moins intéressantes</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Weaker strategy</td>
 +
            <td>Stratégie plus faible</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Stronger strategy</td>
 +
            <td>Stratégie plus solide</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Market presence</td>
 +
            <td>Présence sur le marché</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>OutSystems</td>
 +
            <td>OutSystems</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Mendix</td>
 +
            <td>Mendix</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Kony</td>
 +
            <td>Kony</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Microsoft</td>
 +
            <td>Microsoft</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Salesforce</td>
 +
            <td>Salesforce</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>ServiceNow</td>
 +
            <td>ServiceNow</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>GeneXus</td>
 +
            <td>GeneXus</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Progress Software</td>
 +
            <td>Progress Software</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>WaveMaker</td>
 +
            <td>WaveMaker</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>MatsSoft</td>
 +
            <td>MatsSoft</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Thinkwise</td>
 +
            <td>Thinkwise</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Skuid</td>
 +
            <td>Skuid</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
          <tr>
 +
            <td>Clear Software</td>
 +
            <td>Clear Software</td>
 +
          </tr>
 +
        </table>
 +
      </div>
 +
    </div>
 +
  </div>
    
   <p class="expand mw-collapsible-content">It is worth noting that achieving these goals (likely via low-code) fits into the higher levels of Gartner's Digital Government Maturity Model (such as Level 4 and Level 5).</p>
 
   <p class="expand mw-collapsible-content">It is worth noting that achieving these goals (likely via low-code) fits into the higher levels of Gartner's Digital Government Maturity Model (such as Level 4 and Level 5).</p>
Retrieved from "https://wiki.gccollab.ca/Special:MobileDiff/11084"

Navigation menu

GCwiki