Difference between revisions of "Governance for Digital Solutions"

From wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="wikitable"
+
{{OCIO GCEA Header}}
![[GC Enterprise Architecture/Board/Enterprise Solutions|GC Enterprise Architecture]]
+
<multilang>
![[:en:GC_Enterprise_Architecture/Board|GC Enterprise Architecture Review Board, GC EARB]]
+
@en|
|-
 
|[[GC Service & Digital Target Enterprise Architecture]]
 
|[[GC Enterprise Architecture/Board/When to come|When to come]]
 
|-
 
|[[GC Enterprise Architecture/Framework|Enterprise Architecture Framework]]
 
|[[GC Enterprise Architecture/Board/Forward Agenda|Forward Agenda]]
 
|-
 
|[[GC Enterprise Architecture/Enterprise Solutions|Enterprise Solutions]]
 
|[[GC Enterprise Architecture/Board/Past Sessions|Past Sessions]]
 
|-
 
|[[GC Enterprise Architecture/Working Groups|Working Groups]]
 
|[[10 Things You Need to Know]]
 
|-
 
|[[GC Enterprise Architecture/Other References|Other References]]
 
|[[Governance for Digital Solutions]]
 
|}
 
  
== <u>[https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=32593&section=procedure&p=C Concept Case]</u> ==
+
== <u>[https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=32593&section=procedure&p=B Concept Case]</u> ==
 
* Has the Problem or Opportunity been well defined?
 
* Has the Problem or Opportunity been well defined?
  
Line 26: Line 10:
  
 
== [[GC Enterprise Architecture/Board|<u>GC EARB</u>]] ==
 
== [[GC Enterprise Architecture/Board|<u>GC EARB</u>]] ==
* Have the '''[https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/government-canada-digital-standards.html <u>GC Digital Standards</u>]''' and [[:en:GC_Enterprise_Architecture/Framework|'''Enterprise''' '''Architecture Framework''']] been applied?
+
* Have the '''[https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/government-canada-digital-standards.html <u>GC Digital Standards</u>]''' and [[GC_Enterprise_Architecture/Framework|'''Enterprise''' '''Architecture Framework''']] been applied?
  
 
* Is the initiative a candidate to drive out new GC target architectures?
 
* Is the initiative a candidate to drive out new GC target architectures?
Line 40: Line 24:
 
* Are course corrections needed?
 
* Are course corrections needed?
  
== Presentation: ==
+
@fr|
Governance for Digital Solutions – [[Highlight the integrated nature of the Digital Project journey Explain the Concept Case process Explain when and why to come to GC EARB|Overview of Concept Cases & GC Enterprise Architecture Review Board]]
+
 
 +
== <u>[https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=32593&section=procedure&p=B Cas de concept]</u> ==
 +
* le problème ou l'opportunité est-il bien défini ?
 +
 
 +
* Y-a-t-il une vision clear des résultats opérationnelle souhaités et de l'état ciblé ?
 +
* Y-a-t-il un alignment sur l'utilisation '''<u>[https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/government-canada-digital-standards.html Norme numérique GC]</u>?'''
 +
 
 +
== [[GC Enterprise Architecture/Board|<u>CEAI GC</u>]] ==
 +
* Ont-ils '''[https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/government-canada-digital-standards.html <u>Norme numérique GC</u>]''' et [[GC_Enterprise_Architecture/Framework|'''Enterprise''' '''cadre d'architecture''']] été appliqués?
 +
 
 +
* L'initiative est-elle un candidate pour chasser de nouvelles architectures cibles GC ?
 +
 
 +
== Soumission au SCT ==
 +
* Le project est-il se conforme à la '''politique du CT'''?
 +
 
 +
* Est-il aligné sur les '''stratégies du GC'''?
 +
* Le project a-t-il été à '''CEAI GC'''?
 +
 
 +
== Supervision du Project ==
 +
* Le project est-il bien positionné pour réussir?
 +
* Des corrections de cap sont-elles nécessaires ?
 +
</multilang>

Latest revision as of 11:25, 8 September 2021


Concept Case[edit | edit source]

  • Has the Problem or Opportunity been well defined?
  • Is there a clear vision of the desired business outcomes and future state?
  • Is there alignment to using GC Digital Standards?

GC EARB[edit | edit source]

  • Is the initiative a candidate to drive out new GC target architectures?

TB Submission[edit | edit source]

  • Does the project comply to TB policies?
  • Is it aligned with GC Strategies?
  • Has the project been to GC EARB?

Project Oversight[edit | edit source]

  • Is the project positioned for success?
  • Are course corrections needed?