Changes

   <p>SSC should consider a low-code trial for several reasons: gaining exposure, evaluating low-code tools, and quantifying the ROI (at least for one project). Ideally, all of the leading low-code systems should be evaluated – though the field may be thinned (e.g. to Microsoft PowerApps or OutSystems) based on breadth of the system as well as the match to existing technologies in-use by SSC. During the trial, several aspects should be measured: training cost (which is then translated to amortized training costs as they would be across several projects), amortized licensing costs, elapsed time, client satisfaction, and amortized maintenance costs.</p>

   <p>SSC should consider a low-code trial for several reasons: gaining exposure, evaluating low-code tools, and quantifying the ROI (at least for one project). Ideally, all of the leading low-code systems should be evaluated – though the field may be thinned (e.g. to Microsoft PowerApps or OutSystems) based on breadth of the system as well as the match to existing technologies in-use by SSC. During the trial, several aspects should be measured: training cost (which is then translated to amortized training costs as they would be across several projects), amortized licensing costs, elapsed time, client satisfaction, and amortized maintenance costs.</p>

</div>

</div>

{{#css:

{{#css:

   .breadcrumb-table{  margin: auto; }

   .breadcrumb-table{  margin: auto; }

   .expand{  background-color: rgba(242, 109, 33, 0.2); }

   .highlighted{  background-color: rgba(242, 109, 33, 0.2); }

   .mw-collapsible-text{ text-align:left;  }

   .mw-collapsible-text{ text-align:left;  }

   .inline{  display: inline; }

   .inline{  display: inline; }