Difference between revisions of "GC Enterprise Architecture/Board/When to come"

From wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Use EA.AE email instead of ZZCIOB)
(Update Service and Digital links)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
|width="25%" style="border: 1px dashed steelblue;" |  
 
|width="25%" style="border: 1px dashed steelblue;" |  
  
<b>CRITERIA</b>: [https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=15249 https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=15249]
+
<b>CRITERIA</b>: [https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=32601 Directive on Service and Digital]
  
 
*Proposals concerned with the design, development, installation and implementation of digital services or solutions, information systems and applications ("digital initiatives") where the department is willing to invest a minimum of the following amounts in order to address the problem or take advantage of the opportunity:
 
*Proposals concerned with the design, development, installation and implementation of digital services or solutions, information systems and applications ("digital initiatives") where the department is willing to invest a minimum of the following amounts in order to address the problem or take advantage of the opportunity:
Line 44: Line 44:
 
* That involve emerging technologies;
 
* That involve emerging technologies;
  
* That require an exception to any applicable Directive or Standard under the Policy on the Management of Information Technology;
+
* That require an exception to any applicable Directive or other directives under the Policy on Service and Digital;
  
* That are categorized at the protected B level or below‎ using a deployment model other than public cloud for application hosting (including infrastructure), application deployment, or application development; or  
+
* That are categorized at the protected B level or below‎ using a deployment model other than public cloud for application hosting (including infrastructure), application deployment, or application development; or
  
 
* As directed by the Chief Information Officer of Canada.
 
* As directed by the Chief Information Officer of Canada.
Line 62: Line 62:
 
|width="33.3%" style="border: 1px dashed darkblue;" |  
 
|width="33.3%" style="border: 1px dashed darkblue;" |  
 
<!-- COLUMN 2 STARTS: -->  
 
<!-- COLUMN 2 STARTS: -->  
<b>2.</b> Ensure that proposals are submitted to the Government of Canada Enterprise Architecture Review Board following review of <b>[https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=32578 concept cases] </b>for digital projects and <b>before</b> the development of a Treasury Board Submission or Departmental Business Case.
+
<b>2.</b> Ensure that proposals are submitted to the Government of Canada Enterprise Architecture Review Board following review of <b>[https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=32593&section=procedure&p=C concept cases] </b>for digital projects and <b>before</b> the development of a Treasury Board Submission or Departmental Business Case.
 
<!-- COLUMN 2 ENDS: -->  
 
<!-- COLUMN 2 ENDS: -->  
  
 
|width="33.3%" style="border: 1px dashed darkblue;" |   
 
|width="33.3%" style="border: 1px dashed darkblue;" |   
 
<!-- COLUMN 3 STARTS: -->  
 
<!-- COLUMN 3 STARTS: -->  
<b>3.</b> Ensure all departmental initiatives are assessed against and <b>meet the requirements</b> of Appendix C: Mandatory Procedures for Enterprise Architecture Assessment and Appendix D: Mandatory Procedures for Application Programming Interfaces.
+
<b>3.</b> Ensure all departmental initiatives are assessed against and <b>meet the requirements</b> of Appendix A: Mandatory Procedures for Enterprise Architecture Assessment and Appendix B: Mandatory Procedures for Application Programming Interfaces.
 
<!-- COLUMN 3 ENDS: -->
 
<!-- COLUMN 3 ENDS: -->
 
|}
 
|}
Line 168: Line 168:
 
|width="25%" style="border: 1px dashed steelblue;" |  
 
|width="25%" style="border: 1px dashed steelblue;" |  
  
<b>CRITÈRES</b>: [https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-fra.aspx?id=15249 https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-fra.aspx?id=15249]
+
<b>CRITÈRES</b>: [https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-fra.aspx?id=32601 Directive sur les services et le numérique]
  
 
*Propositions concernant la conception, le développement, l’installation et la mise en œuvre de services ou de solutions numériques, de systèmes d’information et d’applications (« initiatives numériques ») lorsque le ministère est disposé à investir un minimum des montants suivants afin de régler le problème ou de profiter de l’occasion :
 
*Propositions concernant la conception, le développement, l’installation et la mise en œuvre de services ou de solutions numériques, de systèmes d’information et d’applications (« initiatives numériques ») lorsque le ministère est disposé à investir un minimum des montants suivants afin de régler le problème ou de profiter de l’occasion :
Line 194: Line 194:
  
 
* qui comportent des technologies émergentes;
 
* qui comportent des technologies émergentes;
* qui exigent une exception à toute directive ou norme applicable en vertu de la Politique sur la gestion de la technologie de l’information;
+
* qui exigent une exception à la présente directive ou à d’autres directives liées à la Politique sur les services et le numérique;
 
* qui sont catégorisés au niveau Protégé B ou à un niveau inférieur à l’aide d’un modèle de déploiement autre que le nuage public pour l’hébergement d’applications (y compris l’infrastructure), le déploiement d’applications ou le développement d’applications; ou
 
* qui sont catégorisés au niveau Protégé B ou à un niveau inférieur à l’aide d’un modèle de déploiement autre que le nuage public pour l’hébergement d’applications (y compris l’infrastructure), le déploiement d’applications ou le développement d’applications; ou
 
* selon les indications du dirigeant principal de l’information du Canada.
 
* selon les indications du dirigeant principal de l’information du Canada.
Line 210: Line 210:
 
|width="33.3%" style="border: 1px dashed darkblue;" |  
 
|width="33.3%" style="border: 1px dashed darkblue;" |  
 
<!-- COLUMN 2 STARTS: -->  
 
<!-- COLUMN 2 STARTS: -->  
<b>2.</b> Veillez à ce que les propositions soient présentées au Conseil d’examen de l’architecture intégrée du gouvernement du Canada (CEAI GC) après l’examen des [https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-fra.aspx?id=32578 cas conceptuels] pour les projets numériques et <b>avant</b> l’élaboration d’une présentation au Conseil du Trésor ou d’une analyse de rentabilisation ministérielle.
+
<b>2.</b> Veillez à ce que les propositions soient présentées au Conseil d’examen de l’architecture intégrée du gouvernement du Canada (CEAI GC) après l’examen des [https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-fra.aspx?id=32593 cas conceptuels] pour les projets numériques et <b>avant</b> l’élaboration d’une présentation au Conseil du Trésor ou d’une analyse de rentabilisation ministérielle.
 
<!-- COLUMN 2 ENDS: -->  
 
<!-- COLUMN 2 ENDS: -->  
  
 
|width="33.3%" style="border: 1px dashed darkblue;" |   
 
|width="33.3%" style="border: 1px dashed darkblue;" |   
 
<!-- COLUMN 3 STARTS: -->  
 
<!-- COLUMN 3 STARTS: -->  
<b>3.</b> Veillez à ce que toutes les initiatives ministérielles soient évaluées en fonction des <b>exigences</b> de l’annexe C : Procédures obligatoires pour l’évaluation de l’architecture intégrée et de l’annexe D : Procédures obligatoires pour les interfaces de programmation des applications.
+
<b>3.</b> Veillez à ce que toutes les initiatives ministérielles soient évaluées en fonction des <b>exigences</b> de l’annexe A : Procédures obligatoires pour l’évaluation de l’architecture intégrée et de l’annexe B : Procédures obligatoires pour les interfaces de programmation des applications.
 
<!-- COLUMN 3 ENDS: -->
 
<!-- COLUMN 3 ENDS: -->
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 14:17, 10 December 2020

What do I do first?[edit | edit source]

1. Conduct a self-assessment of your initiative against the "Criteria" to determine if you should be presenting to the GC EARB

CRITERIA: Directive on Service and Digital

  • Proposals concerned with the design, development, installation and implementation of digital services or solutions, information systems and applications ("digital initiatives") where the department is willing to invest a minimum of the following amounts in order to address the problem or take advantage of the opportunity:
  • $2.5 million + OPMCA of 0 or 1
  • $5 million + OPMCA of 2
  • $10 million + OPMCA of 3
  • $15 million Department of National Defence
  • $25 million + OPMCA of 4
  • That involve emerging technologies;
  • That require an exception to any applicable Directive or other directives under the Policy on Service and Digital;
  • That are categorized at the protected B level or below‎ using a deployment model other than public cloud for application hosting (including infrastructure), application deployment, or application development; or
  • As directed by the Chief Information Officer of Canada.

Note

1. Please ensure that all proposals submitted for review by the Government of Canada Enterprise Architecture Review Board have first been assessed by the departmental architecture review board where one has been established.

2. Ensure that proposals are submitted to the Government of Canada Enterprise Architecture Review Board following review of concept cases for digital projects and before the development of a Treasury Board Submission or Departmental Business Case.

3. Ensure all departmental initiatives are assessed against and meet the requirements of Appendix A: Mandatory Procedures for Enterprise Architecture Assessment and Appendix B: Mandatory Procedures for Application Programming Interfaces.

2. REQUIRED to come: Complete the "Presenter" intake presentation below:

TEMPLATE: GC EARB Presenter Template

2. NOT REQUIRED to come: Provide rationale in email then forward to:

EMAIL: EA.AE@tbs-sct.gc.ca

3. Send completed presentation or rationale to GC EARB group

EMAIL: EA.AE@tbs-sct.gc.ca


Things to note[edit | edit source]

  • Ensure that all proposals submitted for review to GC EARB have first been assessed by your DARB (Departmental Architecture Review Board) where one has been established.
  • Ensure your departmental initiatives are assessed against and align to the requirements set out as the [GC Architectural Standards].


How do you go about getting on the agenda?[edit | edit source]

  • Complete the presenter intake deck.
  • Email the deck to the generic mailbox: EA.AE@tbs-sct.gc.ca
  • GC Enterprise Architecture will review and conduct initial assessment.
  • Tentative date to present is secured and you will be notified by email.


Architectural Assessment[edit | edit source]

  • GC Enterprise Architecture will review your project material against the GC Digital and GC Architectural Standards.
  • A summary is prepared that notes areas of alignment and areas of possible concern.
  • This summary is shared with the departmental contacts and the EARB Co-Chairs prior to the meeting.


Meeting Logistics – How It Works[edit | edit source]

TBS OCIO Secretariat

2 weeks ahead:

  • The Secretariat will extend the calendar invitations to the presenters (typically 1-2 people)

1 week ahead:

  • FINAL presentation materials (both French and English) are required.
  • Packages are prepared and distributed to EARB members for their review prior to the scheduled meeting.

Day of:

  • Present yourself to the separate security TABLE and see the OCIO Secretariat Representative. (Note: It is recommended to arrive 15 minutes prior to the meeting)
  • You will be signed in and provided a temporary security pass.
  • Make your way to the identified meeting room.
  • Once in the meeting room, please RETURN the temporary pass to OCIO representatives.

Post EARB Meeting:

  • A Record of Discussion (RoD) is prepared after the meeting to capture any highlights that the Board noted, as well as the decision of the Board with any conditions.
  • The RoD may take several weeks to be officially published, but will be made available on the GC Wiki site.