Difference between revisions of "Strategic Research Network"

From wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 43: Line 43:
 
|+
 
|+
 
| scope="col" width="80" |'''2023-12-07'''
 
| scope="col" width="80" |'''2023-12-07'''
| scope="col" width="160" |9am-12pm (ET)
+
| scope="col" width="160" |1:30pm-3:00pm (ET)
 
| scope="col" width="750" |''Data'' provides an overview of the data environments available through Statistics Canada. Participants will learn about performing custom tabulations and multivariate analysis, with specific emphasis on the availability of gender and diversity data and Quality of Life data. This session explains how to access existing microdata and overcome data gaps.
 
| scope="col" width="750" |''Data'' provides an overview of the data environments available through Statistics Canada. Participants will learn about performing custom tabulations and multivariate analysis, with specific emphasis on the availability of gender and diversity data and Quality of Life data. This session explains how to access existing microdata and overcome data gaps.
 
| scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Data|Session 2 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]]
 
| scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Data|Session 2 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]]
Line 52: Line 52:
 
|+
 
|+
 
| scope="col" width="80" |'''2023-06-08'''
 
| scope="col" width="80" |'''2023-06-08'''
| scope="col" width="160" |9am-12pm (ET)
+
| scope="col" width="160" |1:30pm-3:00pm (ET)
 
| scope="col" width="750" |''Case Studies I'' focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage social data. The methods covered are (1) empirical density design, (2) hierarchical linear modelling, and (3) propensity score matching and difference-in-differences.
 
| scope="col" width="750" |''Case Studies I'' focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage social data. The methods covered are (1) empirical density design, (2) hierarchical linear modelling, and (3) propensity score matching and difference-in-differences.
 
| scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies I|Session 3 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]]
 
| scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies I|Session 3 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]]
Line 61: Line 61:
 
|+
 
|+
 
| scope="col" width="80" |'''2022-12-15'''
 
| scope="col" width="80" |'''2022-12-15'''
| scope="col" width="160" |9am-12pm (ET)
+
| scope="col" width="160" |1:30pm-3:00pm (ET)
 
| scope="col" width="750" |''Case Studies II'' also focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage business microdata. The methods covered are (1) propensity score matching and entropy balancing, (2) matching difference-in-differences, and (3) modified causal forest.
 
| scope="col" width="750" |''Case Studies II'' also focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage business microdata. The methods covered are (1) propensity score matching and entropy balancing, (2) matching difference-in-differences, and (3) modified causal forest.
 
| scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies II|Session 4 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]]
 
| scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies II|Session 4 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]]
Line 70: Line 70:
 
|+
 
|+
 
| scope="col" width="80" |'''2022-05-05'''
 
| scope="col" width="80" |'''2022-05-05'''
| scope="col" width="160" |9am-12pm (ET)
+
| scope="col" width="160" |2:00pm-4:00pm (ET)
 
| scope="col" width="750" |''Case Studies II'' also focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage business microdata. The methods covered are (1) propensity score matching and entropy balancing, (2) matching difference-in-differences, and (3) modified causal forest.
 
| scope="col" width="750" |''Case Studies II'' also focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage business microdata. The methods covered are (1) propensity score matching and entropy balancing, (2) matching difference-in-differences, and (3) modified causal forest.
 
| scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies II|Session 4 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]]
 
| scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies II|Session 4 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]]
Line 79: Line 79:
 
|+
 
|+
 
| scope="col" width="80" |'''2021-12-02'''
 
| scope="col" width="80" |'''2021-12-02'''
| scope="col" width="160" |9am-12pm (ET)
+
| scope="col" width="160" |2:00pm-3:00pm (ET)
 
| scope="col" width="750" |''Case Studies II'' also focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage business microdata. The methods covered are (1) propensity score matching and entropy balancing, (2) matching difference-in-differences, and (3) modified causal forest.
 
| scope="col" width="750" |''Case Studies II'' also focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage business microdata. The methods covered are (1) propensity score matching and entropy balancing, (2) matching difference-in-differences, and (3) modified causal forest.
 
| scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies II|Session 4 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]]
 
| scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies II|Session 4 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]]

Revision as of 15:07, 18 April 2024


[Français]

Business Innovation and Growth Support (BIGS) Strategic Research Network

The Business Innovation and Growth Support (BIGS) Strategic Research Network (SRN) is an advisory body that promotes research collaboration within the Government of Canada’s BIGS program community.


Date Time Description Link to Agenda and Materials

May 9, 2024

2024-05-09 1:00pm-3:00pm (ET) Fundamentals provides a comprehensive overview of QIA concepts. Participants will learn the difference between program outcomes and program impacts, and be introduced to the common approaches to QIA (such as difference-in-differences, discontinuity estimators, and more). This session also offers a detailed overview of randomized controlled experiments – the gold standard of QIA. Session 1 - Agenda and Materials [click here]

December 7, 2023

2023-12-07 1:30pm-3:00pm (ET) Data provides an overview of the data environments available through Statistics Canada. Participants will learn about performing custom tabulations and multivariate analysis, with specific emphasis on the availability of gender and diversity data and Quality of Life data. This session explains how to access existing microdata and overcome data gaps. Session 2 - Agenda and Materials [click here]

June 8, 2023

2023-06-08 1:30pm-3:00pm (ET) Case Studies I focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage social data. The methods covered are (1) empirical density design, (2) hierarchical linear modelling, and (3) propensity score matching and difference-in-differences. Session 3 - Agenda and Materials [click here]

December 15, 2022

2022-12-15 1:30pm-3:00pm (ET) Case Studies II also focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage business microdata. The methods covered are (1) propensity score matching and entropy balancing, (2) matching difference-in-differences, and (3) modified causal forest. Session 4 - Agenda and Materials [click here]

May 5, 2022

2022-05-05 2:00pm-4:00pm (ET) Case Studies II also focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage business microdata. The methods covered are (1) propensity score matching and entropy balancing, (2) matching difference-in-differences, and (3) modified causal forest. Session 4 - Agenda and Materials [click here]

December 2, 2021

2021-12-02 2:00pm-3:00pm (ET) Case Studies II also focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage business microdata. The methods covered are (1) propensity score matching and entropy balancing, (2) matching difference-in-differences, and (3) modified causal forest. Session 4 - Agenda and Materials [click here]

Stay connected