118
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: − 1 History + − 1.1 Introduction+ + − 1.2 Why Engage? + + − 2 People and Context + − 2.1 Who was included + + − 2.2 Funding+ + − 3 Goals and Objectives (Policy) + + − 4 Methods and Tools +
Case study: Review of Environmental Assessment Processes (view source)
Revision as of 13:37, 21 March 2019
, 13:37, 21 March 2019no edit summary
__TOC__
__TOC__
===History===
====Introduction====
A commitment to review the current act was in the mandate letter to the Minister of Environment. The public sentiment was that a new assessment process was needed to replace Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012, one that was grounded in evidence and established through consultation with Indigenous peoples and Canadians.
A commitment to review the current act was in the mandate letter to the Minister of Environment. The public sentiment was that a new assessment process was needed to replace Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012, one that was grounded in evidence and established through consultation with Indigenous peoples and Canadians.
Following initial consultations to develop recommendations on how the Environmental Assessment review would be conducted, it was decided that an independent review panel (“the Panel”) would be established. The subsequent consultations and reports produced by the Panel are the focus of this case study.
Following initial consultations to develop recommendations on how the Environmental Assessment review would be conducted, it was decided that an independent review panel (“the Panel”) would be established. The subsequent consultations and reports produced by the Panel are the focus of this case study.
====Why Engage?====
The consultation was initiated with the goal to restore trust in responsible federal oversight of Environmental Assessment processes. To accomplish this, an arm’s-length, neutral, independent review panel led consultations that informed the development of recommendations for changes to the Environmental Assessment Act.
The consultation was initiated with the goal to restore trust in responsible federal oversight of Environmental Assessment processes. To accomplish this, an arm’s-length, neutral, independent review panel led consultations that informed the development of recommendations for changes to the Environmental Assessment Act.
The consultation occurred between September 1st, 2016 and March 31st, 2017.
The consultation occurred between September 1st, 2016 and March 31st, 2017.
===People and Context===
====Who was included====
The Panelists, with support from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, sought input from: academics, business and industry associations, the mining, quarrying, oil and gas extraction industries, the general public, Indigenous peoples, National Indigenous organizations (NIOs), non-profit organizations, experts in the natural resources industry, as well as provinces and territories.
The Panelists, with support from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, sought input from: academics, business and industry associations, the mining, quarrying, oil and gas extraction industries, the general public, Indigenous peoples, National Indigenous organizations (NIOs), non-profit organizations, experts in the natural resources industry, as well as provinces and territories.
====Funding====
2.5 million dollars of federal funds were allocated to the project through the Budget.
2.5 million dollars of federal funds were allocated to the project through the Budget.
===Goals and Objectives (Policy)===
The objective was to overhaul the existing federal environmental impact assessment process by designing a transparent consultation process that brought stakeholders together to provide their input and expertise, and established ongoing partnerships with influencers and affected groups.
The objective was to overhaul the existing federal environmental impact assessment process by designing a transparent consultation process that brought stakeholders together to provide their input and expertise, and established ongoing partnerships with influencers and affected groups.
===Methods and Tools===
Methods and tools were chosen with the intent to ensure transparency throughout the entire process of consultation.
Methods and tools were chosen with the intent to ensure transparency throughout the entire process of consultation.
