Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:     
Yes. The form of the authorized access point, in Canadiana, does not need to be identical to the form of the authorized access point in the LC/NAF file, since they are two distinct authority files. It may even happen that an authorized access point created by LAC in LC/NAF be different from the access point created for the same entity in Canadiana.  
 
Yes. The form of the authorized access point, in Canadiana, does not need to be identical to the form of the authorized access point in the LC/NAF file, since they are two distinct authority files. It may even happen that an authorized access point created by LAC in LC/NAF be different from the access point created for the same entity in Canadiana.  
  −
== May we add a death date in an AAP? ==
  −
  −
LAC's practice, as described in LAC-BAnQ PS 9.19.1.3, states that we do not add birth and/or death dates to existing Authorized Access Points (AACR2 or RDA) if they don't include dates. 
      
== Are there any situations where we may add dates to an existing AAP in a record already in Canadiana? ==
 
== Are there any situations where we may add dates to an existing AAP in a record already in Canadiana? ==

Navigation menu

GCwiki