Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| |1=The NPMS Renewal initiative aims to put in place a more comprehensive project management process that is better aligned to industry best practices. NPMS Renewal will address requests from Public Services and Procurement Canada’s (PSPC) project management community for improved efficiency and simplicity as well as recent Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) requirements associated with its new Directive on the Management of Projects and Programmes and Policy on the Planning and Management of Investments | | |1=The NPMS Renewal initiative aims to put in place a more comprehensive project management process that is better aligned to industry best practices. NPMS Renewal will address requests from Public Services and Procurement Canada’s (PSPC) project management community for improved efficiency and simplicity as well as recent Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) requirements associated with its new Directive on the Management of Projects and Programmes and Policy on the Planning and Management of Investments |
| This initiative includes four critical and interrelated components: | | This initiative includes four critical and interrelated components: |
− | ● an interim NPMS update
| + | |
− | ● project transition activities associated with Benefits Realization
| + | • an interim NPMS update |
− | ● the PSPC Project Navigator
| + | |
− | ● the new Project Management Curriculum
| + | • project transition activities associated with Benefits Realization |
| + | |
| + | • the PSPC Project Navigator |
| + | |
| + | • the new Project Management Curriculum |
| + | |
| | | |
| The end goal is that the PSPC Project Navigator will completely replace the current NPMS by winter 2021, with existing projects becoming fully compliant through phased implementation over three years.|bg=#ececec|padding=10px | | The end goal is that the PSPC Project Navigator will completely replace the current NPMS by winter 2021, with existing projects becoming fully compliant through phased implementation over three years.|bg=#ececec|padding=10px |
Line 57: |
Line 62: |
| | | |
| {{Collapse | | {{Collapse |
− | |1=<p style="text-align:justify;"> | + | |1=NPRAC will be continued.|bg=#ececec|padding=10px |
− | All pages on GCpedia can be seen by all users. GCpedia sysops can protect a page from editing if there is a strong justification for doing so (i.e. protecting a template that is used thousands of times on the wiki). If you need your page protected to prevent other users from editing it, ask yourself whether it belongs on GCpedia in the first place. A simple alternative to protecting a page is to use the template {{tl|protected}}, which asks users to refrain from editing the page.</p>|bg=#ececec|padding=10px
| + | |2=Will NPRAC be removed or continued?}} |
− | |2=Why can’t we have our own departmental pages on GCpedia that aren't accessible to other departments?}} | |
| | | |
| {{Collapse | | {{Collapse |
− | |1=<p style="text-align:justify;"> Members of the [[Chief Information Officer Council (CIOC)]] provide funding to the [[GCTools Team]] to support operations of GCpedia and GCconnex.</p>|bg=#ececec|padding=10px | + | |1=We are looking for projects that are advanced far enough in project life cycle to allow us to test the major documents in the smart document. For example, project that will allow us to create documents with the predefined information and put through gating. Documents included, but not limited to, scope Statement, Business Cases 1,2,3, and Project Management Plan.|bg=#ececec|padding=10px |
− | |2=Is there a cost to using GCpedia?}} | + | |2=What type of project is selected for PoC?}} |
| | | |
| ==<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color: SteelBlue">'''About the Benefits Realization Activities'''</span>== | | ==<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color: SteelBlue">'''About the Benefits Realization Activities'''</span>== |
| | | |
| {{Collapse | | {{Collapse |
− | |1=<p style="text-align:justify;">Yes, federal government employees total approximately 250,000 Canada-wide, which is not a lot of users in the large scheme of wiki/web use. Pages are lightweight in terms of memory use because they contain “thin” media-wiki code. Maximum capacity (all Government of Canada) was considered in the planning stage.</p>|bg=#ececec|padding=10px | + | |1=A core piece of the PSPC Project Navigator is documenting and tracking Benefits Realization to ensure that the project benefits that we hope to achieve, as articulated in the business case, come to fruition. |
− | |2=Can GCpedia support every employee in the federal government?}} | + | |
| + | Beginning in fiscal year 2020 to 2021, new and existing projects will be guided through the process of identifying expected benefits and developing a Benefits Realization plan. Implementation will be through a phased approach, with all projects being aligned with the PSPC Project Navigator process by April 1, 2023. |
| + | |
| + | During the above process, the National Enterprise Project Management Office will develop and refine a method to track benefits, which will be available for use throughout the Department. |
| + | |
| + | Implementation schedule for new and existing projects |
| + | • Fiscal year *2020 to 2021: Projects greater than $100 million. |
| + | *During this time, the process will be refined and regional coordinators will be trained. |
| + | • Fiscal year 2021 to 2022: Projects between $20 million and $100 million. |
| + | • Fiscal year 2022 to 2023: All remaining projects.|bg=#ececec|padding=10px |
| + | |2=What do Benefits Realization activities entail?}} |
| | | |
| ==<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color: SteelBlue">'''Project Navigator'''</span>== | | ==<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color: SteelBlue">'''Project Navigator'''</span>== |
| | | |
| {{Collapse | | {{Collapse |
− | |1=<p style="text-align:justify;">Yes, federal government employees total approximately 250,000 Canada-wide, which is not a lot of users in the large scheme of wiki/web use. Pages are lightweight in terms of memory use because they contain “thin” media-wiki code. Maximum capacity (all Government of Canada) was considered in the planning stage.</p>|bg=#ececec|padding=10px | + | |1=While the National Project Management System name suggests a set of procedures as well as checks and balances used to manage and deliver projects, the focus is firmly placed on objects and processes. When considering the breadth of enhancements in this improved version combined with the associated new curriculum designed to build competencies, it is clear that the new brand should be user-centric. |
− | |2=Can GCpedia support every employee in the federal government?}} | + | |
| + | The PSPC Project Navigator suggests a distinct value proposition—one in which a clear and intuitive process is in place, with structured learning that helps users manage projects effectively. Its promise is ultimately reflected in the tagline: Simplicity, integration, excellence.|bg=#ececec|padding=10px |
| + | |2=Why are we changing the NPMS name to PSPC Project Navigator?}} |
| | | |
| {{Collapse | | {{Collapse |
− | |1=<p style="text-align:justify;">Yes, federal government employees total approximately 250,000 Canada-wide, which is not a lot of users in the large scheme of wiki/web use. Pages are lightweight in terms of memory use because they contain “thin” media-wiki code. Maximum capacity (all Government of Canada) was considered in the planning stage.</p>|bg=#ececec|padding=10px | + | |1=The PSPC Project Navigator improves upon the current NPMS through: |
− | |2=Can GCpedia support every employee in the federal government?}} | + | |
| + | ● streamlined documentation |
| + | |
| + | ● a clear gating model with a “go/no go” decision point |
| + | |
| + | ● introduction of the project sponsor role |
| + | |
| + | ● introduction of Benefits Realization and management |
| + | |
| + | ● general improvements to other existing processes (such as lessons learned and thresholds) |
| + | |
| + | ● better alignment with the PMI and TBS requirements|bg=#ececec|padding=10px |
| + | |2=How will the PSPC Project Navigator be different from the current NPMS?}} |
| | | |
| {{Collapse | | {{Collapse |
− | |1=<p style="text-align:justify;">Yes, federal government employees total approximately 250,000 Canada-wide, which is not a lot of users in the large scheme of wiki/web use. Pages are lightweight in terms of memory use because they contain “thin” media-wiki code. Maximum capacity (all Government of Canada) was considered in the planning stage.</p>|bg=#ececec|padding=10px | + | |1=Because projects selected for the proof of concept exercise will not utilize a fully functioning PSPC Project Navigator product, their participation does not automatically guarantee full compliance with the final system. Instead, selected projects will test new documentation and the gating model as much as possible, providing the opportunity for exposure to the future of project management in PSPC, and ultimately gaining a “head start” on transitioning from the NPMS to the PSPC Project Navigator.|bg=#ececec|padding=10px |
− | |2=Can GCpedia support every employee in the federal government?}} | + | |2=Will projects chosen for the proof of concept exercise be compliant with the PSPC Project Navigator when it is fully launched?}} |
| | | |
| {{Collapse | | {{Collapse |
− | |1=<p style="text-align:justify;">Yes, federal government employees total approximately 250,000 Canada-wide, which is not a lot of users in the large scheme of wiki/web use. Pages are lightweight in terms of memory use because they contain “thin” media-wiki code. Maximum capacity (all Government of Canada) was considered in the planning stage.</p>|bg=#ececec|padding=10px | + | |1=Once the PSPC Project Navigator is fully launched in winter 2021, the NPMS will cease to apply, and existing projects will be positioned in an equivalent and corresponding spot in the new process continuum. A process crosswalk tool will be made available to assist in this determination. It is very important for those managing existing projects to note that they will not be required to resubmit completed NPMS documentation to fit within the new PSPC Project Navigator process.|bg=#ececec|padding=10px |
− | |2=Can GCpedia support every employee in the federal government?}} | + | |2=How will existing projects transition from the NPMS to the PSPC Project Navigator?}} |
| | | |
| {{Collapse | | {{Collapse |
− | |1=<p style="text-align:justify;">Yes, federal government employees total approximately 250,000 Canada-wide, which is not a lot of users in the large scheme of wiki/web use. Pages are lightweight in terms of memory use because they contain “thin” media-wiki code. Maximum capacity (all Government of Canada) was considered in the planning stage.</p>|bg=#ececec|padding=10px | + | |1=Until the PSPC Project Navigator is fully implemented, new projects will continue to use the NPMS. It is anticipated that these projects will only progress a short way through the NPMS before the PSPC Project Navigator is live, and that these new projects will transition to an equivalent and corresponding spot in the new process continuum, meaning no duplication of efforts will occur.|bg=#ececec|padding=10px |
− | |2=Can GCpedia support every employee in the federal government?}} | + | |2=What process do new projects use during this transition? How do I ensure that I will not have to duplicate efforts once the PSPC Project Navigator is fully implemented?}} |
| | | |
| <br> | | <br> |