2,055
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 46:
Line 46: − + − -Identify opportunities to enable business services horizontally across the GC enterprise and to provide cohesive experience to users and other stakeholders − -Reuse common business capabilities, processes and enterprise solutions from across government and private sector+ + + − -Publish in the open all reusable common business capabilities, processes and enterprise solutions for others to develop and leverage cohesive horizontal enterprise services.
GC Enterprise Architecture/Enterprise Solutions (view source)
Revision as of 13:54, 20 August 2020
, 13:54, 20 August 2020fix bulleted list
Increasingly, a number of departmental digital initiatives propose solutions that address matters with common business capabilities, resulting in a diverse range of applications in operations across the GC IT landscape. TBS has recognized a need to provide assistance to departmental CIO’s to inform decision-making with respect to the '''adoption of enterprise solutions'''.
Increasingly, a number of departmental digital initiatives propose solutions that address matters with common business capabilities, resulting in a diverse range of applications in operations across the GC IT landscape. TBS has recognized a need to provide assistance to departmental CIO’s to inform decision-making with respect to the '''adoption of enterprise solutions'''.
The following [https://gcconnex.gc.ca/file/view/64955800/gc-earb-2020-06-04-02-tbs-decision-framework-for-enterprise-solutions-pdf?language=en presentation] is the first iteration of a working draft of a decision making framework that will be used as a guide for the adoption of enterprise solutions. The framework will be added to the revised [[Media:GC EARB Presenter Template-BETA Release Aug 18 2020.pptx|GC EARB presenter template]]. Please send us your feedback on the decision making framework for enterprise solutions to the [mailto:EA.AE@tbs-sct.gc.ca TBS Enterprise Architecture team]
The following [https://gcconnex.gc.ca/file/view/64955800/gc-earb-2020-06-04-02-tbs-decision-framework-for-enterprise-solutions-pdf?language=en presentation] is the first iteration of a working draft of a decision making framework that will be used as a guide for the adoption of enterprise solutions. The framework will be added to the revised [[Images/1/1a/GC EARB Presenter Template-BETA Release Aug 18 2020.pptx|GC EARB presenter template]]. Please send us your feedback on the decision making framework for enterprise solutions to the [mailto:EA.AE@tbs-sct.gc.ca TBS Enterprise Architecture team]
== Enterprise Solutions/Shared Services and the EA Framework ==
== Enterprise Solutions/Shared Services and the EA Framework ==
The Business Architecture layer of the the EA Framework has the following assessment criteria for GC EARB reviews:
The Business Architecture layer of the the EA Framework has the following assessment criteria for GC EARB reviews:
* Promote Horizontal Enablement of the Enterprise
* Promote Horizontal Enablement of the Enterprise
* Identify opportunities to enable business services horizontally across the GC enterprise and to provide cohesive experience to users and other stakeholders
* Reuse common business capabilities, processes and enterprise solutions from across government and private sector
* Publish in the open all reusable common business capabilities, processes and enterprise solutions for others to develop and leverage cohesive horizontal enterprise services.
== DRAFT: Patterns and Practices regarding Enterprise Solutions/Shared Services: Spectrum of Options ==
== DRAFT: Patterns and Practices regarding Enterprise Solutions/Shared Services: Spectrum of Options ==
Enterprise Solutions may be governed using three general models that provide relative advantages in terms of addressing technical debt, minimizing total cost of ownership, maximizing use of talent, maximizing consistency of technology and business processes, and optimizing infrastructure.
Enterprise Solutions may be governed using three general models that provide relative advantages in terms of addressing technical debt, minimizing total cost of ownership, maximizing use of talent, maximizing consistency of technology and business processes, and optimizing infrastructure.
