3
edits
Important: The GCConnex decommission will not affect GCCollab or GCWiki. Thank you and happy collaborating!
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 14:
Line 14: − + Line 67:
Line 67: + + +
Strategic Environmental and Economic Assessment/SEEA Public Statements Guidelines (view source)
Revision as of 16:41, 30 March 2026
, 30 MarchModified trigger for detailed economic analysis to align with current SEEA process.
* A proposal is considered to have triggered a '''detailed environmental analysis''' if any sections of the '''Climate Nature and Economy Lens (CNEL) Part A – Strategic Environmental Analysis''' were completed.
* A proposal is considered to have triggered a '''detailed environmental analysis''' if any sections of the '''Climate Nature and Economy Lens (CNEL) Part A – Strategic Environmental Analysis''' were completed.
* A proposal is considered to have triggered a '''detailed economic analysis''' if it was not deemed exempt from such analysis and that '''CNEL''' '''Part B – Strategic Economic Analysis''' was completed.
* A proposal is considered to have triggered a '''detailed economic analysis''' if '''CNEL''' '''Part B – Strategic Economic Analysis''' was completed and the proposal meets or exceeds the current financial threshold that triggers the completion of this part of the CNEL.<sup>1</sup>
=== When to issue the public statement ===
=== When to issue the public statement ===
=== Additional Resources ===
=== Additional Resources ===
For additional resources and guidance, drafters should contact the SEEA experts within their department or agency. Questions from SEEA experts can be directed to the SEEA Secretariat at ECCC at [mailto:eees-seea@ec.gc.ca eees-seea@ec.gc.ca].
For additional resources and guidance, drafters should contact the SEEA experts within their department or agency. Questions from SEEA experts can be directed to the SEEA Secretariat at ECCC at [mailto:eees-seea@ec.gc.ca eees-seea@ec.gc.ca].
<sup><small>1</small></sup> <small>For example, if Part B’s financial threshold was $15 million when the CNEL was completed but it is now $150 million, and the proposal’s annual amount falls between these two thresholds, the proposal is no longer considered to have triggered a detailed economic analysis for the purpose of the public statement.</small>
