Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:  
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 10%;" | [[CRI Tools and Resources|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="CRI Tools and Resources">Tools</span>]]
 
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 10%;" | [[CRI Tools and Resources|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="CRI Tools and Resources">Tools</span>]]
 
|}
 
|}
<span style="color: #1F402B"><big>'''Overview'''</big></span>
  −
<br>
      +
== <span style="color: #1F402B"><big>'''Overview'''</big></span> ==
 
Experimentation can mean different things in different contexts to different people. There are various approaches to what constitutes an experiment among researchers, innovators and evaluation practitioners. At its loosest, an ‘experiment’ is sometimes used to mean ‘trying out something new’. Strict definitions, on the other hand, consider a process an experiment only if it generates evidence that meets very specific criteria. The Centre for Regulatory Innovation’s (CRI) focus is on regulatory experimentation.  
 
Experimentation can mean different things in different contexts to different people. There are various approaches to what constitutes an experiment among researchers, innovators and evaluation practitioners. At its loosest, an ‘experiment’ is sometimes used to mean ‘trying out something new’. Strict definitions, on the other hand, consider a process an experiment only if it generates evidence that meets very specific criteria. The Centre for Regulatory Innovation’s (CRI) focus is on regulatory experimentation.  
 
<div style="background-color: #E3F2FD; padding: 10px; border-left: 5px solid #1E88E5; margin: 5px 0;">
 
<div style="background-color: #E3F2FD; padding: 10px; border-left: 5px solid #1E88E5; margin: 5px 0;">
Line 27: Line 26:  
*'''A regulatory process.''' This covers a broad range of activities. For example, a regulator could test different ways of consulting stakeholders on the design of new regulations, such as co-development, or it could run an experiment to understand if a new process for compliance or enforcement is better than the current procedures in place.
 
*'''A regulatory process.''' This covers a broad range of activities. For example, a regulator could test different ways of consulting stakeholders on the design of new regulations, such as co-development, or it could run an experiment to understand if a new process for compliance or enforcement is better than the current procedures in place.
   −
 
+
== <span style="color: #1F402B"><big>'''What are the benefits of regulatory experimentation?'''</big></span> ==
<span style="color: #1F402B"><big>'''What are the benefits of regulatory experimentation?'''</big></span> <br>
+
The core reason to undertake regulatory experimentation is to provide evidence or information to inform regulatory decision making. Experimentation can complement other approaches such as post-implementation evaluation, or research and theory to make decisions. Experimentation and experiments can be useful to regulators for several reasons:
<br>
  −
The core reason to undertake regulatory experimentation is to provide evidence or information to inform regulatory decision making. Experimentation can complement other approaches such as post-implementation evaluation, or research and theory to make decisions. Experimentation and experiments can be useful to regulators for several reasons:  
  −
 
   
#They provide a structured approach to systematically generate high quality evidence to inform regulators’ decisions. Experimentation provides a way in which valuable new information (e.g. how well a new regulatory approach works) can be generated through a structured process. Building a robust evidence base is an essential component of better regulation.
 
#They provide a structured approach to systematically generate high quality evidence to inform regulators’ decisions. Experimentation provides a way in which valuable new information (e.g. how well a new regulatory approach works) can be generated through a structured process. Building a robust evidence base is an essential component of better regulation.
 
#They are a powerful way to test alternative approaches and to identify potentially better approaches to achieving regulatory objectives. This might include new regulatory approaches (e.g. for a new technology, product or service) or improvements to existing regulatory approaches (e.g. to reduce the compliance burden without increasing compliance risk).
 
#They are a powerful way to test alternative approaches and to identify potentially better approaches to achieving regulatory objectives. This might include new regulatory approaches (e.g. for a new technology, product or service) or improvements to existing regulatory approaches (e.g. to reduce the compliance burden without increasing compliance risk).
Line 38: Line 34:  
#Experiments can generate information in complex, changing systems. They can be particularly useful in rapidly changing circumstances where previous research and theory may become quickly outdated or offer little guidance.
 
#Experiments can generate information in complex, changing systems. They can be particularly useful in rapidly changing circumstances where previous research and theory may become quickly outdated or offer little guidance.
 
# By building a more robust evidence base they help to build consensus around a particular regulatory option or issue that may otherwise be contested.
 
# By building a more robust evidence base they help to build consensus around a particular regulatory option or issue that may otherwise be contested.
<br>
+
<span style="color: #1F402B"><big>'''The CRI and regulatory experimentation'''</big></span> <br>The CRI’s goals include creating opportunities for regulatory experimentation and helping federal regulators embed experimental learnings into regulation. The CRI can support regulators with the design and implementation of regulatory experiments through guidance and funding available through the [[Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund| Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund]]. For further information please contact the CRI at [mailto:cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca?Subject=Regulatory%20Experimentation%20Enquiry&body=%20 <u>cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca</u>].
<span style="color: #1F402B"><big>'''The CRI and regulatory experimentation'''</big></span> <br>
  −
<br>
  −
The CRI’s goals include creating opportunities for regulatory experimentation and helping federal regulators embed experimental learnings into regulation. The CRI can support regulators with the design and implementation of regulatory experiments through guidance and funding available through the [[Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund| Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund]]. For further information please contact the CRI at [mailto:cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca?Subject=Regulatory%20Experimentation%20Enquiry&body=%20 <u>cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca</u>].
 
365

edits

Navigation menu

GCwiki