450
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 131:
Line 131: − '''Interdepartmental Steering Committee assesses proposals and makes final funding decisions based on:''' − * '''Public Benefit''': Extent to which Canadians will benefit from the experiment's learnings − * '''Viability''': Likelihood of delivering sought learnings, including risk assessment and mitigation − * '''Value for Money''': Assessment of total forecasted costs and internal resources − + + + + + + + + + + + +
Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund draft (view source)
Revision as of 09:25, 6 September 2024
, 6 Septemberno edit summary
===<small>Proposal Assessment</small>===
===<small>Proposal Assessment</small>===
| style="background-color: #f2f2f2;" |
| style="background-color: #f2f2f2;" |
'''Note:''' Other factors may be considered, such as ensuring a range of supported organizations or focus areas
'''For proposal assessment, the Steering Committee (SC) will:'''
# '''Assess Eligibility''': Ensure all proposals meet the basic requirements for consideration.
# '''Conduct Assessment''': Eligible applications will be assessed and ranked based on:
#* Public Benefits: Extent to which Canadians will benefit from the experiment's learnings
#* Viability: Likelihood of delivering sought learnings, including risk assessment and mitigation
#* Alignment with the Fund Objective: How well the proposal aligns with the overall goals of the funding initiative
# '''Prioritize if High Volume of Quality EOIs''': When there are many high-quality Expressions of Interest (EOIs), the SC may prioritize those that:
## Foster innovation applicable across multiple sectors
## Align with key government initiatives
## Can provide financial and resource contributions at a departmental level
|-
|-
| style="background-color: #C3D0C9;" |'''5.'''
| style="background-color: #C3D0C9;" |'''5.'''
