Changes

| style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 16px; padding-top: 16px; text-align: center; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif !important;font-size: 11pt;line-height:1.1;font-weight:bold;" width="11%" |<span style="color: #252F38">[[CRI Tools and Resources |Tools and Resources]]</span>

| style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 16px; padding-top: 16px; text-align: center; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif !important;font-size: 11pt;line-height:1.1;font-weight:bold;" width="11%" |<span style="color: #252F38">[[CRI Tools and Resources |Tools and Resources]]</span>

|}

|}

==='''What are Regulatory Sandboxes?'''===

==='''What are Regulatory Sandboxes?'''===

Regulatory sandboxes can help regulators keep pace with the speed of innovation by learning the real-life impacts of new products or services before their full entry into the marketplace.  

A regulatory sandbox is a tool that allows regulators to learn how to incorporate or best regulate innovation before making permanent regulatory changes. It allows for temporary limited authorizations of innovation and demonstrates how regulatory regimes could be modernized, while under regulatory supervision. Evidence gathered can help a regulator decide whether to make any permanent changes, including how an innovative product, service, process, regulatory approaches, or non-regulatory approach should be managed. <blockquote>For example, regulators may want to understand how a regulatory approach would work for a new technology that is not currently permitted under existing regulation. In these cases, regulators could enable regulatory sandboxes by issuing temporary authorization from specific legislative or regulatory requirements. This allows them to evaluate how the new technology could be regulated in a modern or innovative way.  

 

Regulators can actively monitor the implementation of the new technology and establish conditions to ensure that consumer protections are upheld throughout the process. If any unexpected risks emerge or the situation changes, regulators have the flexibility to adjust the conditions or terminate the regulatory sandbox, as needed.

Regulators may be unsure about how to regulate a new product or service. They may also lack the data needed to understand how a new regulatory approach would work, or how to effectively resolve a regulatory barrier that is stopping an innovation from getting to the market. In these cases, regulators could use regulatory sandboxes to help understand how the innovation works in practice and then use that evidence to make any permanent regulatory changes or decisions – all while continuing to uphold protections for health, safety, and the environment.

The evidence gathered from the regulatory sandbox can provide valuable insights. This data helps regulators make informed decisions about permanently allowing the technology, ensuring that it is safely and effectively integrated into the market. By learning from these regulatory sandboxes, regulators can determine how they should design and manage regulations and create modernized frameworks that are more effective and well-suited to innovation.</blockquote>

For example, regulators may want to understand how a regulatory approach would work for a new technology that is not allowed by the regulations. In these cases, regulators could enable regulatory sandboxes by issuing temporary limited exemptions from a specific legislative or regulatory requirement that would allow them to evaluate how the new technology could be regulated in practice. Within a controlled environment, regulators can actively monitor the approach and put in place conditions to make sure that consumer protections are upheld throughout. If any unexpected risks come up or the situation changes, regulators can change the conditions or end the regulatory sandbox as needed. The evidence gathered could help regulators to make regulatory change that would permanently allow the new technology.  

Below are examples of regulatory sandboxes that federal regulators have undertaken.  

By learning from these regulatory sandboxes, regulators can determine how they should design and manage regulations and create modernized frameworks that are more effective and well-suited to innovation.

Only a few federal departments and agencies currently have the authority to run regulatory sandboxes and fewer have yet launched any. Under the proposed federal framework for regulatory sandboxes, all ministers will have the opportunity to implement them.  

==='''Regulatory Sandboxes in the Federal Government'''===

In [https://budget.canada.ca/2024/report-rapport/chap4-en.html#Cutting_Red_Tape:~:text=Cutting%20Red%20Tape%20to,to%20modern%20business%20realities. Budget 2024], the Government committed to enable broader use of regulatory sandboxes across government, including announcing its intent to introduce amendments to the ''Red Tape Reduction Act'' to provide all Ministers will the authority to issue exemptions for the purpose of enabling regulatory sandboxes.  

 

{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible"

|'''Regulatory Sandbox Description'''

|[https://tc.canada.ca/en/aviation/publications/aviation-safety-letter/issue-4-2020/remotely-piloted-aircraft-systems-rpas-otherwise-known-drones Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems] (2019 – ongoing)

|Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems, or drones, have become increasingly popular over the last several years. To address the safety risks associated with the growing number of drone operations, Transport Canada introduced Part IX of the ''Canadian Aviation Regulations'' (CARs) in January 2019. These rules outline the regulations for drone flights in Canada. However, the regulation did not fully cover beyond visual line-of-sight (BVLOS) operations and other innovative drone uses, which are crucial for extending operational range, improving efficiency, accessing remote areas, reducing costs, and enhancing safety.

Transport Canada has used their authority under the ''[https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/A-2.pdf Aeronautics Act]'' to issue [https://tc.canada.ca/en/aviation/reference-centre/exemptions-canadian-aviation-regulations-cars/exemption-sections-60241-60366-paragraphs-90164c-90183c-canadian-aviation-regulations exemptions] and special licences for testing currently prohibited or unregulated drone activities under government supervision. This includes BVLOS operations in sparsely populated areas, below 400 feet, using visual observer detect and avoid (DAA) functions, and, in some cases, testing technological solutions for DAA.

To support the Government’s commitment in Budget 2024, the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) has developed an enterprise-wide framework for regulatory sandboxes, informed by discussions with federal regulators as well as a [https://letstalkfederalregulations.ca/sandboxes public consultation] on the ''Let’s Talk Federal Regulations'' platform ([https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/laws/developing-improving-federal-regulations/regulatory-evaluation-results/what-we-heard-report-consultation-on-the-annual-regulatory-modernization-bill.html What We Heard Report]).

The evidence gathered from this regulatory sandbox has supported Transport Canada’s decision to make [https://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2023/2023-06-24/html/reg6-eng.html amendments] to the ''[https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/SOR-96-433.pdf Canadian Aviation Regulations]'' regarding drone use in Canada. These changes, specifically for lower-risk BVLOS operations, will come into force on April 1, 2025.

|[https://tc.canada.ca/en/dangerous-goods/electronic-shipping-documents/study-use-electronic-shipping-documents-transport-dangerous-goods Electronic Shipping Documents] (2020-2022)

|The ''Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations'' previously required a physical paper shipping document to accompany most dangerous goods while in transport. To modernize this process, Transport Canada initiated a two-year regulatory sandbox to explore using electronic shipping documents instead of paper ones.

The primary goal was to determine if using electronic shipping documents could be as safe or safer than traditional paper documents. By reducing paperwork, the initiative aimed to modernize the regulations and streamline the transportation process. Throughout the regulatory sandbox, Transport Canada collaborated with industry stakeholders to pilot various digital platforms, ensuring they met stringent security and accessibility standards.

==='''NEW - Consultation: Policy on Regulatory Sandboxes (May 6, 2024 to May 24, 2024)'''===

Based on the findings, Transport Canada has modernized parts of the ''Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations'' to reduce the administrative burden and allow the use of electronic shipping documents for transport by rail and by remotely piloted aircraft systems.

TBS is seeking feedback from federal regulators on a draft Policy on Regulatory Sandboxes under the [https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/laws/developing-improving-federal-regulations/requirements-developing-managing-reviewing-regulations/guidelines-tools/cabinet-directive-regulation.html Cabinet Directive on Regulation] that would support the implementation of the enterprise-wide framework and will establish direction for federal regulators to ensure common safeguards and prescribed best practices for conducting regulatory sandboxes across the government.

One of the key benefits of this initiative was the enhanced ability of first responders to access crucial information remotely, helping them avoid potential hazards. The speed and accuracy of information sharing were significantly improved, leading to more efficient and safer transportation processes. Additionally, the adoption of electronic shipping documents resulted in substantial environmental benefits, with participants saving 21 million sheets of paper, significantly reducing paper and ink usage.  

Please join TBS’s Centre for Regulatory Innovation for a webinar on '''May 13,2024 from 10:00 to 11:00 EST''' to learn more about the consultation and ask questions before providing departmental feedback! To register for the webinar, please fill out this online form: [https://events.teams.microsoft.com/event/f64617a7-73e8-44ac-a90c-0223002871c4@6397df10-4595-4047-9c4f-03311282152b <nowiki>[LINK]</nowiki>]

|Per ''[https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/SOR-96-433.pdf Canadian Aviation Regulations]'', Flight Training Units (FTUs) must have a Certificate of Airworthiness for their aircraft. Despite the potential benefits of using Light Sports Aircraft (LSA) for flight training, LSAs do not have such certification, making them unusable by FTUs. Incorporating LSAs could reduce costs for Canadian businesses, integrate new technologies into current practices, lower emissions and pollution with more fuel-efficient training aircraft, and enhance Canada's international competitiveness.

To explore this need, Transport Canada, supported by funding from the [[:en:Regulatory_Experimentation_Expense_Fund|CRI’s Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund]], enabled a regulatory sandbox to determine if LSAs can safely be used for flight training under an alternative regulatory approach. The goal of the regulatory sandbox is to assess the reliability and suitability of LSAs in training environments, focusing on their performance, emissions, and noise level. Transport Canada issued regulatory exemptions (CTA-001-2024) allowing LSAs to be used without the required Certificate of Airworthiness. The learnings from the regulatory sandbox will be used to inform the development of an appropriate regulatory framework to support the safe use of these innovative aircrafts.

'''Questions?'''  

'''Questions?'''  

If you have any questions, please contact the CRI at: [Mailto:cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca].

If you have any questions, please contact the CRI at: [Mailto:cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca].