503
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 59:
Line 59: + + + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
| scope="col" width="125" |English with bilingual materials
| scope="col" width="125" |English with bilingual materials
| scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies I|Session 3 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]]
| scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies I|Session 3 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]]
|}
=='''<small>Session 4 - Case Studies II</small>'''==
{|
|+
| scope="col" width="80" |'''March 28'''
| scope="col" width="115" |9am-12pm (ET)
| scope="col" width="670" |''Case Studies II'' also focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage business microdata. The methods covered are (1) propensity score matching and entropy balancing, (2) matching difference-in-differences, and (3) modified causal forest.
| scope="col" width="125" |English with bilingual materials
| scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies II|Session 4 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]]
|}
|}
