Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | {{#css: | + | {{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px); clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</span>}} |
− | *{
| |
− | box-sizing: border-box;
| |
− | }
| |
− | .column {
| |
− | float: left;
| |
− | width: 33%;
| |
− | padding: 0 10px;
| |
− | } | |
− | /* Remove extra left and right margins, due to padding */ | |
− | .row {margin: 0 -5px;
| |
− | margin-top: 20px;}
| |
| | | |
− | /* Clear floats after the columns */
| + | [[FR:Académie du numérique de l'EFPC]] |
− | .row:after {
| + | __NOTOC__ |
− | content: "";
| |
− | display: table;
| |
− | clear: both;
| |
− | }
| |
− | .card {
| |
− | box-shadow: 0 4px 8px 0 rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);
| |
− | padding: 10px;
| |
− | border: #F67C65 solid 2px;
| |
− | }
| |
− | </div>
| |
| | | |
− | </div>
| + | [[Atelier sur l'évaluation quantitative de l'impact|[Français]]] |
| | | |
− | ----
| + | [[File:QIA GCwiki Header (EN).png|frameless|1269x1269px]] |
| | | |
− | /* For smaller screen sizes */
| + | ='''Quantitative Impact Assessment (QIA) Workshop (2024)'''= |
− | @media (min-width: 100px) and (max-width: 850px)
| + | {| |
− | { | + | |+ |
− | .column {
| + | | scope="col" width="1200" |Statistics Canada (StatCan) and the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) have organized a four-day workshop on using QIA methods for program evaluation. Participants will learn the strengths and limitations of QIA methods and how to better leverage data. |
− | width: 100%;
| + | |} |
− | display: block;
| |
− | margin-bottom: 20px;
| |
− | }
| |
− | }}
| |
| | | |
− | <div class="row"><div class="column"><div class="card">
| |
− | <h2>'''<small>[https://forms.office.com/r/AmCE5jynu9 Register Now!]</small>'''</h2>[[File:QIA Maple Leaf Photo (1000 x 1000 px).png|alt=Maple leaf|left|frameless|81x81px|Maple leaf]]<p>Statistics Canada and the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat invite you to participate in the third Quantitative Impact Assessment (QIA) workshop. </p><p></p></div>
| |
− | </div>
| |
| | | |
− | </div>
| |
− |
| |
− | <p></p>
| |
− |
| |
− | [[FR:Académie du numérique de l'EFPC]]
| |
− | __NOTOC__
| |
− | ='''<small>Quantitative Impact Assessment (QIA) Workshop (2024)</small>'''=
| |
− | Statistics Canada (StatCan) and the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) have organized a four-day workshop on using QIA methods for program evaluation. Participants will learn the strengths and limitations of QIA methods and how to better leverage data.
| |
| | | |
| {| | | {| |
− | |
| |
− | |
| |
− | |
| |
− | |
| |
− | |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | scope="col" width="80" |'''Date''' | | | scope="col" width="80" |'''Date''' |
| | scope="col" width="115" |'''Time''' | | | scope="col" width="115" |'''Time''' |
− | | scope="col" width="600" |'''Description''' | + | | scope="col" width="670" |'''Description''' |
| | scope="col" width="125" |'''Language''' | | | scope="col" width="125" |'''Language''' |
| | scope="col" width="210" |'''Link to Agenda and Materials''' | | | scope="col" width="210" |'''Link to Agenda and Materials''' |
Line 71: |
Line 30: |
| | | | | |
| |} | | |} |
− | </div>
| |
− |
| |
− | </div>
| |
| | | |
| =='''<small>Session 1 - Fundamentals</small>'''== | | =='''<small>Session 1 - Fundamentals</small>'''== |
Line 80: |
Line 36: |
| | scope="col" width="80" |'''March 19''' | | | scope="col" width="80" |'''March 19''' |
| | scope="col" width="115" |9am-12pm (ET) | | | scope="col" width="115" |9am-12pm (ET) |
− | | scope="col" width="600" |''Fundamentals'' provides a comprehensive overview of QIA concepts. Participants will learn the difference between program outcomes and program impacts, and be introduced to the common approaches to QIA (such as difference-in-differences, discontinuity estimators, and more). This session also offers a detailed overview of randomized controlled experiments – the gold standard of QIA. | + | | scope="col" width="670" |''Fundamentals'' provides a comprehensive overview of QIA concepts. Participants will learn the difference between program outcomes and program impacts, and be introduced to the common approaches to QIA (such as difference-in-differences, discontinuity estimators, and more). This session also offers a detailed overview of randomized controlled experiments – the gold standard of QIA. |
| | scope="col" width="125" |English with bilingual materials | | | scope="col" width="125" |English with bilingual materials |
− | | scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Fundamentals|Session 1 - Agenda and Materials [click here]]] | + | | scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Fundamentals|Session 1 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]] |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 90: |
Line 46: |
| | scope="col" width="80" |'''March 21''' | | | scope="col" width="80" |'''March 21''' |
| | scope="col" width="115" |9am-12pm (ET) | | | scope="col" width="115" |9am-12pm (ET) |
− | | scope="col" width="600" |''Data'' provides an overview of the data environments available through Statistics Canada. Participants will learn about performing custom tabulations and multivariate analysis, with specific emphasis on the availability of gender and diversity data and Quality of Life data. This session explains how to access existing microdata and overcome data gaps. | + | | scope="col" width="670" |''Data'' provides an overview of the data environments available through Statistics Canada. Participants will learn about performing custom tabulations and multivariate analysis, with specific emphasis on the availability of gender and diversity data and Quality of Life data. This session explains how to access existing microdata and overcome data gaps. |
| | scope="col" width="125" |English with bilingual materials | | | scope="col" width="125" |English with bilingual materials |
− | | scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Data|Session 2 - Agenda and Materials [click here]]] | + | | scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Data|Session 2 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]] |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 100: |
Line 56: |
| | scope="col" width="80" |'''March 26''' | | | scope="col" width="80" |'''March 26''' |
| | scope="col" width="115" |9am-12pm (ET) | | | scope="col" width="115" |9am-12pm (ET) |
− | | scope="col" width="600" |''Case Studies I'' focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage social data. The methods covered are (1) empirical density design, (2) hierarchical linear modelling, and (3) propensity score matching and difference-in-differences. | + | | scope="col" width="670" |''Case Studies I'' focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage social data. The methods covered are (1) empirical density design, (2) hierarchical linear modelling, and (3) propensity score matching and difference-in-differences. |
| | scope="col" width="125" |English with bilingual materials | | | scope="col" width="125" |English with bilingual materials |
− | | scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies I|Session 3 - Agenda and Materials [click here]]] | + | | scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies I|Session 3 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]] |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 110: |
Line 66: |
| | scope="col" width="80" |'''March 28''' | | | scope="col" width="80" |'''March 28''' |
| | scope="col" width="115" |9am-12pm (ET) | | | scope="col" width="115" |9am-12pm (ET) |
− | | scope="col" width="600" |''Case Studies II'' also focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage business microdata. The methods covered are (1) propensity score matching and entropy balancing, (2) matching difference-in-differences, and (3) modified causal forest. | + | | scope="col" width="670" |''Case Studies II'' also focuses on three real-life examples of QIA methods being applied to evaluate program performance and impact. These case studies primarily leverage business microdata. The methods covered are (1) propensity score matching and entropy balancing, (2) matching difference-in-differences, and (3) modified causal forest. |
| | scope="col" width="125" |English with bilingual materials | | | scope="col" width="125" |English with bilingual materials |
− | | scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies II|Session 4 - Agenda and Materials [click here]]] | + | | scope="col" width="210" |[[Quantitative Impact Assessment Workshop/Case Studies II|Session 4 - Agenda and Materials <small>[click here]</small>]] |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |