Important: The GCConnex decommission will not affect GCCollab or GCWiki. Thank you and happy collaborating!

Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:  
| style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 16px; padding-top: 16px; text-align: center; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif !important;font-size: 11pt;line-height:1.1;font-weight:bold;" width="11%" |<span style="color: #Black">[[CRI Tools and Resources |Tools and Resources]]</span>
 
| style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 16px; padding-top: 16px; text-align: center; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif !important;font-size: 11pt;line-height:1.1;font-weight:bold;" width="11%" |<span style="color: #Black">[[CRI Tools and Resources |Tools and Resources]]</span>
 
|}
 
|}
 +
<div style="background: #ffae42; color:white; font-family:Arial;padding:10px">[[Image:Deadline.png |30px|left|Deadline]] <span style= "font-size: 11pt"> '''EOIs for the Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund will be accepted until January 16, 2024.'''</span>
 +
</div>
   −
== '''Project Eligibility'''==
+
=='''Project Eligibility'''==
The REEF is a fund to help regulators innovate or support innovation in the marketplace by experimenting with:
+
The Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund (REEF) is a fund to help regulators innovate or support innovation in the marketplace by experimenting with:
    
*Innovative approaches to any stage(s) of the regulatory lifecycle (issue definition and instrument choice, regulatory development, administration, compliance/enforcement, and review/evaluation)
 
*Innovative approaches to any stage(s) of the regulatory lifecycle (issue definition and instrument choice, regulatory development, administration, compliance/enforcement, and review/evaluation)
Line 29: Line 31:  
*determining whether an experiment would be the right approach (<span style="font-size:14px; color:#538b01; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic;">NEW!</span>)
 
*determining whether an experiment would be the right approach (<span style="font-size:14px; color:#538b01; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic;">NEW!</span>)
 
*developing a regulatory experiment (e.g., scope, evidence needs, experimental process, data collection methods) (<span style="font-size:14px; color:#538b01; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic;">NEW!</span>)
 
*developing a regulatory experiment (e.g., scope, evidence needs, experimental process, data collection methods) (<span style="font-size:14px; color:#538b01; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic;">NEW!</span>)
*conducting a regulatory experiment </p>
+
*conducting a regulatory experiment</p>
    
=='''What can the REEF offer?'''==  
 
=='''What can the REEF offer?'''==  
Line 51: Line 53:  
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
== '''Step 2: Expression of Interest''' ==
+
=='''Step 2: Expression of Interest'''==
 +
 
      Line 62: Line 65:  
<p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content mw-collapsed">The EOI provides a brief overview of the proposed experiment or pre-experimentation project and amount of funding requested. The EOI should not take more than a few hours to complete. If you have questions on how to complete the EOI, it is recommended that you reach out to the CRI. EOIs should be submitted by email to cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca. The CRI will contact applicants as required if clarifications on the proposed experiment or pre-experimentation project are needed. Applicants with an eligible EOI will be invited to submit a proposal. </p>
 
<p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content mw-collapsed">The EOI provides a brief overview of the proposed experiment or pre-experimentation project and amount of funding requested. The EOI should not take more than a few hours to complete. If you have questions on how to complete the EOI, it is recommended that you reach out to the CRI. EOIs should be submitted by email to cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca. The CRI will contact applicants as required if clarifications on the proposed experiment or pre-experimentation project are needed. Applicants with an eligible EOI will be invited to submit a proposal. </p>
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|  
== '''Step 3: Proposal Submission''' ==
+
=='''Step 3: Proposal Submission'''==
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Successful EOI applicants will be invited to complete the second stage of the application process which is the submission of a full proposal. Before developing a proposal, applicants should obtain the support of their Director General or above. The CRI supports applicants throughout the proposal development process. Regulators should refer to the Regulators’ Experimentation Toolkit to assist in identifying, designing, and carrying out regulatory experiments and sandboxes.<p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content"></p>
 
|Successful EOI applicants will be invited to complete the second stage of the application process which is the submission of a full proposal. Before developing a proposal, applicants should obtain the support of their Director General or above. The CRI supports applicants throughout the proposal development process. Regulators should refer to the Regulators’ Experimentation Toolkit to assist in identifying, designing, and carrying out regulatory experiments and sandboxes.<p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content"></p>
Line 72: Line 75:  
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
== '''Step 4: Funding Decision''' ==
+
=='''Step 4: Funding Decision'''==
 
|-
 
|-
|Funding will be available from April 2023 upon completion of a MOU with the successful applicant and TBS, and is made available on a cost recovery basis.<p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content"></p>  
+
| Funding will be available from April 2023 upon completion of a MOU with the successful applicant and TBS, and is made available on a cost recovery basis.<p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content"></p>  
    
<p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content mw-collapsed">The department is responsible to forecast their expenses and include the spending schedule in the MOU. The department will be expected to submit scheduled invoices to TBS to recover the expenses incurred as well as submitting financial forecast to allow TBS to decommit the funds that the department no longer plans on recovering.</p><p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content mw-collapsed"></p><p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content mw-collapsed">For more information on each step of the process, please see the [https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.gccollab.ca%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fdd%2FREEF_Guide_-_2022.docx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK REEF Guide.]</p>
 
<p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content mw-collapsed">The department is responsible to forecast their expenses and include the spending schedule in the MOU. The department will be expected to submit scheduled invoices to TBS to recover the expenses incurred as well as submitting financial forecast to allow TBS to decommit the funds that the department no longer plans on recovering.</p><p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content mw-collapsed"></p><p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content mw-collapsed">For more information on each step of the process, please see the [https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.gccollab.ca%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fdd%2FREEF_Guide_-_2022.docx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK REEF Guide.]</p>
Line 88: Line 91:  
*<u>[https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.gccollab.ca%2Fimages%2Fa%2Fa6%2FProposal_Template.docx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK Proposal Template]</u>
 
*<u>[https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.gccollab.ca%2Fimages%2Fa%2Fa6%2FProposal_Template.docx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK Proposal Template]</u>
   −
= REEF Ongoing Projects=
+
=REEF Ongoing Projects=
 
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
 
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
 
|+
 
|+
Line 98: Line 101:  
|-
 
|-
 
|Transport Canada (TC)
 
|Transport Canada (TC)
| Light Sport Aircraft
+
|Light Sport Aircraft
 
|This experiment as proposed by TC involves setting  up a sandbox to determine if Light Sport Aircraft, with appropriate  conditions, are as reliable as other aircraft currently being used for the  purpose of flight training and if the quality of training is as good, or  better, than other aircraft currently used for pilot training. The experiment  will also inform Transport Canada on potential additional conditions/measures  that should be included in future exemptions or regulatory amendments.
 
|This experiment as proposed by TC involves setting  up a sandbox to determine if Light Sport Aircraft, with appropriate  conditions, are as reliable as other aircraft currently being used for the  purpose of flight training and if the quality of training is as good, or  better, than other aircraft currently used for pilot training. The experiment  will also inform Transport Canada on potential additional conditions/measures  that should be included in future exemptions or regulatory amendments.
 
|- bgcolor="#C8D0C1"
 
|- bgcolor="#C8D0C1"
 
|Innovation Science and Economic Development (ISED) –  Standards Council of Canada (SCC)
 
|Innovation Science and Economic Development (ISED) –  Standards Council of Canada (SCC)
|Piloting an Accreditation Program for the Assessment  of Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS)
+
| Piloting an Accreditation Program for the Assessment  of Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS)
 
|The purpose of this experiment is to pilot a  prototype accreditation program to understand whether the main SCC  Requirements and Guidance document that works in conjunction with ISO/IEC  17021-1:2015 Conformity assessment is clear and appropriate and obtain  feedback from the certification bodies and Artificial Intelligence (AI)  companies about the program. This information is necessary to improve and  refine the prototype.
 
|The purpose of this experiment is to pilot a  prototype accreditation program to understand whether the main SCC  Requirements and Guidance document that works in conjunction with ISO/IEC  17021-1:2015 Conformity assessment is clear and appropriate and obtain  feedback from the certification bodies and Artificial Intelligence (AI)  companies about the program. This information is necessary to improve and  refine the prototype.
   Line 108: Line 111:  
|-
 
|-
 
|Transport Canada (TC)
 
|Transport Canada (TC)
| Aviation E-Licensing Pilot
+
|Aviation E-Licensing Pilot
 
|This is a follow up to previous experiment to test a  new QR code prototype with pilots of an air operator within Canada for  effectiveness. The sandbox experiment will test if the digital solution  lowers the cost of compliance and improve compliance with respect to air  operators’ obligation to track employee compliance with licensing  requirements.
 
|This is a follow up to previous experiment to test a  new QR code prototype with pilots of an air operator within Canada for  effectiveness. The sandbox experiment will test if the digital solution  lowers the cost of compliance and improve compliance with respect to air  operators’ obligation to track employee compliance with licensing  requirements.
 
|- bgcolor="#C8D0C1"
 
|- bgcolor="#C8D0C1"
 
|Health Canada (HC)
 
|Health Canada (HC)
| Machine Learning Enabled Medical Device (MLMD)  Sandbox Development
+
|Machine Learning Enabled Medical Device (MLMD)  Sandbox Development
 
|Health Canada is developing a sandbox to test new  regulatory approach for MLMDs. Currently, MLMD can be marketed in Canada if  the device algorithm behaviour is locked to remain the same overtime as what  was presented in the product’s market authorization application. Any change  to the algorithm behaviour requires the submission of an amendment to the  licence. Health Canada wants to test a new regulatory approach that would use  a different method of risk management than requiring a licence amendment so that  the device can change its behaviour over time as it learns from new data it  acquires over time. The current project scope is limited to accessing the  legislative authorities to establish the sandbox and developing the sandbox  application scheme.
 
|Health Canada is developing a sandbox to test new  regulatory approach for MLMDs. Currently, MLMD can be marketed in Canada if  the device algorithm behaviour is locked to remain the same overtime as what  was presented in the product’s market authorization application. Any change  to the algorithm behaviour requires the submission of an amendment to the  licence. Health Canada wants to test a new regulatory approach that would use  a different method of risk management than requiring a licence amendment so that  the device can change its behaviour over time as it learns from new data it  acquires over time. The current project scope is limited to accessing the  legislative authorities to establish the sandbox and developing the sandbox  application scheme.
 
|}
 
|}
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
151

edits

Navigation menu

GCwiki