Line 20: |
Line 20: |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | == Project Eligibility== | + | == '''Project Eligibility'''== |
| The REEF is a fund to help regulators innovate or support innovation in the marketplace by experimenting with: | | The REEF is a fund to help regulators innovate or support innovation in the marketplace by experimenting with: |
| | | |
Line 31: |
Line 31: |
| *conducting a regulatory experiment | | *conducting a regulatory experiment |
| | | |
− | ==What can the REEF offer?== | + | =='''What can the REEF offer?'''== |
| | | |
| Regulators can receive: | | Regulators can receive: |
Line 44: |
Line 44: |
| | | |
| | | |
− | =The REEF Process= | + | ='''The REEF Process'''= |
| [[File:The_REEF_Process_Graphic_v2.png|alt=|799x799px]]<div class="mw-collapsible" data-expandtext="Show Detailed REEF Steps" data-collapsetext="Hide Detailed REEF Steps"> | | [[File:The_REEF_Process_Graphic_v2.png|alt=|799x799px]]<div class="mw-collapsible" data-expandtext="Show Detailed REEF Steps" data-collapsetext="Hide Detailed REEF Steps"> |
| <div class="mw-collapsible-toggle btn" style="float: left; display: block;"> | | <div class="mw-collapsible-toggle btn" style="float: left; display: block;"> |
Line 50: |
Line 50: |
| </div><br /><br /> | | </div><br /><br /> |
| | | |
| + | <p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content"><big>'''Step 2: Expression of Interest Submission'''</big></p> |
| | | |
− | === Step 2: Expression of Interest Submission ===
| |
| <p class="highlighted mw-collapsible-content">The departments submit a high-level Expression of Interest (EOI) that is used by the CRI to determine the eligibility of the project. To be eligible for funding, proposed experiments must clearly demonstrate how their funding request meets the criteria as outlined in the REEF Guide. It is highly recommended that applicants informally confirm the eligibility of their project by scheduling an informal consultation with the CRI before completing an EOI. EOI submissions are due January 16, 2024.</p><p class="highlighted mw-collapsible-content"></p> | | <p class="highlighted mw-collapsible-content">The departments submit a high-level Expression of Interest (EOI) that is used by the CRI to determine the eligibility of the project. To be eligible for funding, proposed experiments must clearly demonstrate how their funding request meets the criteria as outlined in the REEF Guide. It is highly recommended that applicants informally confirm the eligibility of their project by scheduling an informal consultation with the CRI before completing an EOI. EOI submissions are due January 16, 2024.</p><p class="highlighted mw-collapsible-content"></p> |
| | | |
Line 78: |
Line 78: |
| <p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content">Funding will be available from April 2023 upon completion of a MOU with the successful applicant and TBS, and is made available on a cost recovery basis.</p><p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content"></p> | | <p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content">Funding will be available from April 2023 upon completion of a MOU with the successful applicant and TBS, and is made available on a cost recovery basis.</p><p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content"></p> |
| | | |
− | <p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content">The department is responsible to forecast their expenses and include the spending schedule in the MOU. The department will be expected to submit scheduled invoices to TBS to recover the expenses incurred as well as submitting financial forecast to allow TBS to decommit the funds that the department no longer plans on recovering.</p> | + | <p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content">The department is responsible to forecast their expenses and include the spending schedule in the MOU. The department will be expected to submit scheduled invoices to TBS to recover the expenses incurred as well as submitting financial forecast to allow TBS to decommit the funds that the department no longer plans on recovering.</p><p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content"></p><p class="highlighted inline mw-collapsible-content"></p> |
− | </div>
| |
| | | |
− | =REEF Ongoing Projects= | + | ==Application Documents== |
| + | |
| + | *REEF Guide |
| + | *[[Images/6/6b/CRI Regulators' Experimentation Toolkit.pdf|Regulators’ Experimentation Toolkit]] |
| + | |
| + | *Expression of Interest (EOI) Template |
| + | |
| + | *Proposal Template</div> |
| + | |
| + | = REEF Ongoing Projects= |
| {| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" | | {| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" |
| |+ | | |+ |
Line 91: |
Line 99: |
| |- | | |- |
| |Transport Canada (TC) | | |Transport Canada (TC) |
− | |Light Sport Aircraft | + | | Light Sport Aircraft |
| |This experiment as proposed by TC involves setting up a sandbox to determine if Light Sport Aircraft, with appropriate conditions, are as reliable as other aircraft currently being used for the purpose of flight training and if the quality of training is as good, or better, than other aircraft currently used for pilot training. The experiment will also inform Transport Canada on potential additional conditions/measures that should be included in future exemptions or regulatory amendments. | | |This experiment as proposed by TC involves setting up a sandbox to determine if Light Sport Aircraft, with appropriate conditions, are as reliable as other aircraft currently being used for the purpose of flight training and if the quality of training is as good, or better, than other aircraft currently used for pilot training. The experiment will also inform Transport Canada on potential additional conditions/measures that should be included in future exemptions or regulatory amendments. |
| |- | | |- |
| |Innovation Science and Economic Development (ISED) – Standards Council of Canada (SCC) | | |Innovation Science and Economic Development (ISED) – Standards Council of Canada (SCC) |
− | | Piloting an Accreditation Program for the Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS) | + | |Piloting an Accreditation Program for the Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS) |
| |The purpose of this experiment is to pilot a prototype accreditation program to understand whether the main SCC Requirements and Guidance document that works in conjunction with ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Conformity assessment is clear and appropriate and obtain feedback from the certification bodies and Artificial Intelligence (AI) companies about the program. This information is necessary to improve and refine the prototype. | | |The purpose of this experiment is to pilot a prototype accreditation program to understand whether the main SCC Requirements and Guidance document that works in conjunction with ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Conformity assessment is clear and appropriate and obtain feedback from the certification bodies and Artificial Intelligence (AI) companies about the program. This information is necessary to improve and refine the prototype. |
| | | |
Line 105: |
Line 113: |
| |- | | |- |
| |Health Canada (HC) | | |Health Canada (HC) |
− | |Machine Learning Enabled Medical Device (MLMD) Sandbox Development | + | | Machine Learning Enabled Medical Device (MLMD) Sandbox Development |
| |Health Canada is developing a sandbox to test new regulatory approach for MLMDs. Currently, MLMD can be marketed in Canada if the device algorithm behaviour is locked to remain the same overtime as what was presented in the product’s market authorization application. Any change to the algorithm behaviour requires the submission of an amendment to the licence. Health Canada wants to test a new regulatory approach that would use a different method of risk management than requiring a licence amendment so that the device can change its behaviour over time as it learns from new data it acquires over time. The current project scope is limited to accessing the legislative authorities to establish the sandbox and developing the sandbox application scheme. | | |Health Canada is developing a sandbox to test new regulatory approach for MLMDs. Currently, MLMD can be marketed in Canada if the device algorithm behaviour is locked to remain the same overtime as what was presented in the product’s market authorization application. Any change to the algorithm behaviour requires the submission of an amendment to the licence. Health Canada wants to test a new regulatory approach that would use a different method of risk management than requiring a licence amendment so that the device can change its behaviour over time as it learns from new data it acquires over time. The current project scope is limited to accessing the legislative authorities to establish the sandbox and developing the sandbox application scheme. |
| |} | | |} |