Important: The GCConnex decommission will not affect GCCollab or GCWiki. Thank you and happy collaborating!
Page history
16 May 2023
→Can I correct the AAP in an existing notice that contains the note " CETTE NOTICE VERSÉE EN LOT DOIT ÊTRE ÉVALUÉE AVANT D'ÊTRE UTILISÉE, POUR S'ASSURER QU'ELLE RÉPONDE AUX NORMES DU PFAN "?
m-10
→I have located the authority of the person for whom I need to create the AAP in the LC/NAF file after checking that 9.2.2.5.3 applies. Can I take the preferred name form as is?
m-10
→When a person's name in a Latin resource is derived from a non-Latin script, can I create the AAP using the form found in the resource?
m-10
→Should preferred titles and variant titles of works be transliterated in fields 1XX and 4XX of authority records?
m-10
14 February 2023
no edit summary
m+4
no edit summary
→8. After establishing my AAP, I see that the LC/NAF file contains an authority record for this person with a multitude of access point variants, some of which are in non-Latin script. Is it good practice to copy and paste all the non-Latin variants into my record?
-3
9 February 2023
no edit summary
→Does the PFAN plan to use the MARC 880 (alternative script) field or use the 4XX fields instead?
→Does the PFAN plan to use the MARC 880 (alternative script) field or use the 4XX fields instead?
+1
→Does the PFAN plan to use the MARC 880 (alternative script) field or use the 4XX fields instead?
-28
→Does the PFAN plan to use the MARC 880 (alternative script) field or use the 4XX fields instead?
→What are the differences between romanization, transcription and transliteration?
no edit summary
+64
no edit summary
-160
no edit summary
-1,423
