9
edits
Changes
Third Review of the Directive on Automated Decision-Making (view source)
Revision as of 13:23, 25 April 2024
, 25 April→Reference materials: removed outdated references
* Establish explanation criteria in support of the explanation requirement and integrate them into the [https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digital-government-innovations/responsible-use-ai/algorithmic-impact-assessment.html Algorithmic Impact Assessment (AIA)].
* Establish explanation criteria in support of the explanation requirement and integrate them into the [https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digital-government-innovations/responsible-use-ai/algorithmic-impact-assessment.html Algorithmic Impact Assessment (AIA)].
* Expand the AIA to include questions concerning an institution's reasons for pursuing automation and potential impacts on persons with disabilities.
* Expand the AIA to include questions concerning an institution's reasons for pursuing automation and potential impacts on persons with disabilities.
* Mandate the publication of complete or summarized peer reviews and require completion prior to system production.
* Mandate the publication of a complete or summarized peer review prior to system production.
* Align the contingency requirement with relevant terminology established in Treasury Board security policy.
* Align the contingency requirement with relevant terminology established in Treasury Board security policy.
* Mandate the release of AIAs prior to the production of a system and their review on a scheduled basis.
* Mandate the release of an AIA prior to the production of a system and ensure it is reviewed on a scheduled basis.
=== Expected outcomes ===
=== Expected outcomes ===
The recommendations would reinforce transparency and accountability; strengthen protections against discrimination and harm; ensure that automated decision systems impacting federal public servants are fair and inclusive; clarify requirements; and support operational needs.
The recommendations would reinforce transparency and accountability; strengthen protections against discrimination and harm; ensure that automated decisions impacting the rights or interests of individuals – including federal public servants – are fair and inclusive; clarify requirements; and support operational needs.
== '''Stakeholder Engagement''' ==
== '''Stakeholder Engagement''' ==
TBS divided stakeholder engagement into two phases. The second phase ran between September and November 2022. It involved outreach to federal AI policy and data communities; agents of parliament; bargaining agents; industry representatives; and international organizations. The first phase ran between April and July 2022, and mainly drew on the expertise of federal partners operating automation projects and subject matter experts in academia, civil society, and counterparts in other governments. The What We Heard Reports linked below provide a summary of engagement themes and outcomes.
TBS divided stakeholder engagement into two phases. The second phase ran between September and November 2022. It involved outreach to federal AI policy and data communities; agents of parliament; bargaining agents; industry representatives; and international organizations. The first phase ran between April and July 2022, and mainly drew on the expertise of federal partners operating automation projects and subject matter experts in academia, civil society, and counterparts in other governments. The What We Heard Reports linked below provide a summary of engagement themes and outcomes.
=== Reference materials ===
=== Reference materials ===
* Winter 2023 - [[:en:images/3/33/3rd_review_of_the_Directive_on_Automated_Decision-Making_-_2nd_What_We_Heard_Report_(EN).pdf|What We Heard Report (phase 2 of stakeholder engagement)]]
* Fall 2022 - [[:en:images/archive/f/f4/20230125001443!DADM_3rd_Review_-_Phase_2_Consultation_Deck_(EN).pdf|Phase 2 consultation: key issues, policy recommendations, and provisional amendments]]
What We Heard Report (phase 2 of stakeholder engagement) ([[:File:3rd review of the Directive on Automated Decision-Making - 2nd What We Heard Report (EN).pdf|Phase 2 WWHR]])
* Summer 2022 - [[:en:images/3/32/WWHR_-_Phase_1_of_Stakeholder_Engagement_on_the_3rd_Review_of_the_DADM_(EN).pdf|What We Heard Report (phase 1 of stakeholder engagement)]]
* Spring 2022 - [[:en:images/d/d6/DADM_3rd_review_-_Phase_1_consultation_-_Key_issues,_policy_recommendations,_and_amendments_(v2).pdf|Phase 1 consultation: key issues, policy recommendations, and provisional amendments]]
Phase 2 consultation: key issues, policy recommendations, and provisional amendments ([[:File:DADM 3rd Review - Phase 2 Consultation Deck (EN).pdf|Phase 2 Consultation]])
* Spring 2022 - [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4087546 Report on the 3rd review of the Directive on Automated Decision-Making (phase 1)]
What We Heard Report (phase 1 of stakeholder engagement) ([[:File:WWHR - Phase 1 of Stakeholder Engagement on the 3rd Review of the DADM (EN).pdf|Phase 1 WWHR]])
Phase 1 consultation: key issues, policy recommendations, and provisional amendments (forthcoming)
[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4087546 Report on the 3rd review of the Directive on Automated Decision-Making (phase 1)]
=== Contact ===
=== Contact ===