Difference between revisions of "Public Engagement Case Studies"

From wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
===Get involved===
 
===Get involved===
Interested in sharing your own Public Engagement case studies? We've created a [[Public Engagement Case studies template | bilingual template for departments]] and gcwiki colleagues to add their own case studies. We're always looking to expand our knowledge of good public engagement, we encourage you to research, write or document examples you seen in the Canada, or other jurisdictions to enable learning what works well together.
+
Interested in sharing your own Public Engagement case studies? We've created a [[Public Engagement Case studies template | bilingual template for departments]] and gcwiki colleagues to add their own case studies. We're always looking to expand our knowledge of good public engagement, we encourage you to research, write or document examples you seen in the Canadian, or other jurisdictions to enable learning what works well together.
  
 
==How to add your own Case study==
 
==How to add your own Case study==
Line 23: Line 23:
 
#Click <em>Create the page "Your page title" on this wiki!</em> to create a new page.
 
#Click <em>Create the page "Your page title" on this wiki!</em> to create a new page.
 
#Copy and paste the [[template|Public Engagement Case studies template]] into a new page.
 
#Copy and paste the [[template|Public Engagement Case studies template]] into a new page.
#Enter your case study details in English and French.  
+
#Enter your case study details in English on one page and in French on another page.  
 
#Link your case studies in English and French using wiki text.
 
#Link your case studies in English and French using wiki text.
 
#Upload any documents you might have using the Upload file on the left menu of GCwiki.
 
#Upload any documents you might have using the Upload file on the left menu of GCwiki.
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 
<!--Start of table definition-->
 
<!--Start of table definition-->
{|style="background:transparent; color:black" border="0" height="230" align="left" valign="bottom" cellpadding=10px cellspacing=0px
+
{| style="background:transparent; color:black" border="0" align="left" cellpadding="10px" cellspacing="0px" height="230" valign="bottom"
  
 
<!--Start of the details for the top-of-table heading-->
 
<!--Start of the details for the top-of-table heading-->
  
<!--Start the first row and add row formats-->
+
<!--Start the first row and add row formats-->|- align="left"
 
 
 
 
|-align="left"
 
 
    
 
    
 
<!--Start of individual cell details for the first row-->
 
<!--Start of individual cell details for the first row-->
Line 50: Line 47:
 
|
 
|
 
<!--Start of a second row and add formats-->
 
<!--Start of a second row and add formats-->
|-align="center" valign="top"
+
|- align="center" valign="top"
  
 
<!--Start of individual cell details for the second row-->
 
<!--Start of individual cell details for the second row-->
|width="25"|
+
| width="25" |
|width="100"|'''Nutrition North Canada'''
+
| width="100" |'''Nutrition North Canada'''
|width="25"|
+
| width="25" |
|width="100"|'''Expert Panel Review of Environmental Assessment Processes'''  
+
| width="100" |'''Expert Panel Review of Environmental Assessment Processes'''  
|width="25"|
+
| width="25" |
|width="100"|'''National Housing Strategy'''
+
| width="100" |'''National Housing Strategy'''
|width="25"|
+
| width="25" |
|width="100";;|'''International Assistance Review'''  
+
| width="100" ;; |'''International Assistance Review'''  
|width="25"|
+
| width="25" |
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 14:45, 22 October 2019


Background

The Consultations and Public Engagement Team of the Privy Council Office of Canada is pleased to share the first round of Public Engagement case studies. Over the course of 2018, interviews were conducted with policy analysts, public engagement advisers, communications teams, developers, and managers who were involved with the planning and execution of a consultation linked to a major policy initiative.

The interviews were semi structured, to allow conversations to flow-freely. The case studies capture the purpose, objectives and scope of a consultation; they look at process considerations, including methods, tools and analysis, as well as governance and decision making, successes, challenges, and overall outcomes.

The goal of these case studies is to showcase Government of Canada public engagement, share lessons learned, and illustrate the decision making process that practitioners of public engagement make when undertaking these large-scale projects. We selected the format of case studies so that key learnings remain connected to the context in which they took place. We hope that in sharing these case studies, readers will better understand the diverse considerations and complexities of public engagement.

These are the first four case studies to be published, with more to follow in 2019.


If you have any questions or comments, please connect with us at consultation@pco-bcp.gc.ca


Get involved

Interested in sharing your own Public Engagement case studies? We've created a bilingual template for departments and gcwiki colleagues to add their own case studies. We're always looking to expand our knowledge of good public engagement, we encourage you to research, write or document examples you seen in the Canadian, or other jurisdictions to enable learning what works well together.

How to add your own Case study

  1. Search for a new page, by entering your case study title into the main search at the top right of GCwiki.
  2. Click Create the page "Your page title" on this wiki! to create a new page.
  3. Copy and paste the Public Engagement Case studies template into a new page.
  4. Enter your case study details in English on one page and in French on another page.
  5. Link your case studies in English and French using wiki text.
  6. Upload any documents you might have using the Upload file on the left menu of GCwiki.


Nutrition north.jpg
Review of Environmental Assessment Processes
National Housing Strategy
International Assistance Review
Nutrition North Canada Expert Panel Review of Environmental Assessment Processes National Housing Strategy International Assistance Review