GC Enterprise IT Portfolio FAQs

From wiki
Revision as of 08:54, 22 November 2019 by Jana.jessome (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Home IT Expenditure Application Portfolio Management (APM) IT Plan FAQs

IT Expenditure[edit | edit source]

High-Level IT Expenditure Model Questions[edit | edit source]

Question: For the IT Expenditure Model, can you briefly explain the various schedules and the linkages between them?

Answer: The Schedules of the GC IT Expenditure Model and their linkages are as follows:

Schedule 1 – Total High Level Expenditures

  • Combines Schedule 2 – High-Level Expenditures OPEX and Schedule 3 – High-Level Expenditures CAPEX worksheets to provide an overall departmental expenditure summary.

Schedule 2 – High Level Expenditures OPEX: Summary level operational expenditures aligned to the GC Profile of IT Services;

  • The expenditures from the “Total” column and respective rows (i.e. Hardware, Software, Human Resources, etc.) of Schedule 4 (OPEX) are automatically populated in the "Distributed Computing" “Column” and respective “Rows” of Schedule 2.
  • The combined expenditures from the “Total” column and respective rows (i.e. Hardware, Software, Human Resources etc) of Schedule 5 (OPEX) are automatically populated in the "Application / Database Development and Maintenance" “Column” and respective “Rows” of Schedule 2.

Schedule 3 – High Level Expenditures CAPEX: Summary level capitalization expenditures aligned to the GC Profile of IT Services;

  • The expenditures from the “Total” column and respective rows (i.e. Hardware, Software, Human Resources, etc.) of Schedule 4 (CAPEX) are automatically populated in the "Distributed Computing" “Column” and respective “Rows” of Schedule 3.
  • The combined expenditures from the “Total” column and respective rows (i.e. Hardware, Software, Human Resources etc) of Schedule 5 (CAPEX) are automatically populated in the "Application / Database Development and Maintenance" “Column” and respective “Rows” of Schedule 3.

Schedule 4 – Distributed Computing Environment (DCE) Services (OPEX and CAPEX): Expenditures for each of the services under DCE, defined in the GC Profile of IT Services;

  • The expenditures from Schedule 4 (OPEX) “Total” column and respective rows (i.e. Hardware, Software, Human Resources, etc.) should match & link with the "Distributed Computing" “Column” and respective “Rows” of Schedule 2 High level Expenditures OPEX.
  • The expenditures from Schedule 4 (CAPEX) “Total” column and respective rows (i.e. Hardware, Software, Human Resources, etc.) should match & link with the "Distributed Computing" “Column” and respective “Rows” of Schedule 3 High level Expenditures CAPEX.

Schedule 5 – Application / Database Development & Maintenance Services by Application Domains (OPEX and CAPEX): Expenditures related to Application / Database Development & Maintenance, aligned to the Application Domains as originally introduced as part of Application Portfolio Management (APM);

  • The combined expenditures from the “Total” column and respective rows (i.e. Hardware, Software, Human Resources etc) of Schedule 5 (OPEX) are automatically populated in the "Application / Database Development and Maintenance" “Column” and respective “Rows” of Schedule 2.
  • The combined expenditures from the “Total” column and respective rows (i.e. Hardware, Software, Human Resources etc) of Schedule 5 (CAPEX) are automatically populated in the "Application / Database Development and Maintenance" “Column” and respective “Rows” of Schedule 3.

Schedule 6 – Application / Database Development & Maintenance Services by Outcome Areas (OPEX and CAPEX): Expenditures related to Application / Database Development & Maintenance, aligned to the Outcome Areas and Internal Services;

  • Note on Schedule 5 and 6: The combined expenditures from the “Total” column and respective rows (i.e. Hardware, Software, Human Resources, etc) of Schedule 5 and 6 should match.
  • There should also be internal consistency between the columns which are linked to Internal Services domains and the Internal Services Outcome Area, and the Other domain and the Program Outcome areas.
    • Looking at the ADDM by App. Domains OPEX tab, the columns for the Application Domains "Acquisition" through "Legal" are the Internal Services domains. Therefore the subtotals of these columns should be equal to the subtotal for the ADDM by Outcome Areas OPEX tab Internal Services column.
    • Looking at the ADDM by Outcome Areas OPEX tab, all Outcome areas except Internal Services are the Program Outcomes, broken first by portfolio (Ecomonic Affairs through Government Affairs) and then into specific Outcomes. The subtotal of all program Outcome Areas should be equal to the ADDM by App. Domains OPEX "Other" column subtotal.
    • The same follows for the CAPEX tabs.
    • If your totals do not balance, the system will give you an error when you attempt to approve the High Level Expenditures (OPEX or CAPEX) schedules (2 and 3).

Schedule 7 – Notes: Annotated notes that departments wish to provide by individual Schedules 1 to 4 or an itemized list (for example One-time expenses; Special events e.g. Winter Olympics, G8 Summit; Ever greening etc.) of notes.

  • Include any pertinent information that would inform TBS regarding your OPEX/CAPEX decisions. For example, if your department does not have a Capital Vote, and therefore did not report capitalized expenditures separately, this should be noted.
Question: Can you describe important changes to the report?


  • The report has been split into Operational cost (OPEX) and Capitalization cost (CAPEX) sections, with respective tabs for each.
  • The External Services expenditure category was broken apart on all schedules to allow cloud service-related expenses to be identified as separate from other professional services.
  • In the model file, the amount of error checking has been increased, in order to improve reporting quality by departments.

Note: It is important that no structural changes are made to the worksheets, e.g. addition or deletion of rows or columns, as it will impact the functioning of formulas and error checking.

Question: Does my department need to report both Operational (OPEX) and Capitalization (CAPEX) expenses?

Answer: You must report CAPEX costs if:

  • your department capitalizes IT expenses, and
  • your department has a capital vote.

You may report CAPEX costs (but are not obligated to) if:

  • your department capitalizes IT expenses, and
  • your department does not have a capital vote.

In this case, if you choose not to report CAPEX costs, these costs should be included on your OPEX tabs. You should not leave these costs out.

If your department does not capitalize IT expenses:

  • you would report all expenses on the OPEX tabs.
Question: Does my department have to report on DCE Services (Schedule 4, previously Schedule 2)?

Answer: There was an error made in the training deck that was presented for the 2015/16 IT Expenditure report. For that year, TBS allowed departments to group their DCE Services (Schedule 2 at the time) expenses under a total column, instead of breaking it down into separate service lines. The change was somewhat late-breaking in nature, therefore the IT Expenditure Guide, and the FAQ page were not updated to match the altered version of the IT Expenditure Model, which was posted on GCconnex. This led some departments to believe that they did not need to report on Schedule 2 at all, since both the original and modified templates were available.

The following year, the error was not caught, and TBS reverted back to the original model. Therefore, departments who had mistakenly used the original model and not reported on Schedule 2 were not made aware of the error. Additionally, some departments continued to use the amended model, and this was also not caught, though reporting in a grouped manner was no longer supported.

To clarify, reporting on DCE Services (Schedule 4) is mandatory. Please use the most current model, version 1.4. All previous models have been deprecated, and will not be accepted by TBS.

Question: What Cloud IT Expenditures can I capitalize?

Answer: There is no current Canadian public sector standard for cloud capitalization.

It is often assumed that Cloud Services expenses should always be expensed (OPEX), however the US Standard is suggesting to treat them in the same way as your internal use software.

You can capitalize a portion of your costs, including development costs and hardware. Training, planning, and research costs should be expensed.

It is suggested that departments do an analysis to determine what can be capitalized, and reach out to the Office of the Comptroller General for any large capitalization decisions.

Note that when you go for a TB Submission, you need to make the decision for Vote 1 (OPEX) or Vote 5 (CAPEX) before you submit.

General Questions[edit | edit source]

Question: Should the Service or Help Desk costs be included as indirect costs under IT Program Management or attributed to five IT Services?

Answer: “Service or Help Desk” costs are not included within the IT Program Management column. The “Service or Help Desk” costs should be attributed, to the five IT Service groups namely Distributed Computing, Application Development / Maintenance, Production and Operations, Telecommunications and IT security where applicable. Note that the Service or Help desk costs if provided by an external to GC provider must be reported in the “External Services” row and attributed across all five service groups. See response to next question if the Service or Help desk is an “Internal Service”.

Question: In which IT Service Group should I be including the costs associated with our internal “Service or Help desk” (salaries, contractors, etc.)?

Answer: As noted above, the costs must be attributed to the five relevant IT services as applicable (i.e. Distributed Computing, Application Development / Maintenance, Production and Operations, Telecommunications and IT security). If the service is NOT provided by an external to GC provider, the input costs should also be reported under the respective rows (i.e. Hardware, Software, Human Resources etc) where applicable. If there are contractors complementing departmental staff (staff augmentation) and providing Service or Help desk services, the contractors should be reported under "Professional Services" in the “External Services” section while the Departmental staff should be reported under the “HR” rows. If the “Service” or “Help” desk is provided by another department, the costs must be reported in the “IT Services Received” row by the service receiver and attributed to the relevant IT Service groups.

Question: Should I be reporting only the IT costs within my CIO (or equivalent) shop, or do I need to report other IT costs in my department?

Answer: Your reporting should be as exhaustive as possible. This includes:

  • All expenses within your CIO or HOIT (Head of IT) cost centres that are not pure Information Management (IM) costs. See question 4 for details.
  • Any IT expenses in custodial cost centres.
  • Any IT expenses in project cost centres.
  • All IT expenses in program area cost centres, where it is possible to identify those costs. In some cases, if the costs have been reported as supplies or other office equipment, it may be difficult to determine if these are, in fact, IT costs. Given that these costs are generally not material, it is not necessary to exhaustively identify these individual costs. For example, it may be that a program area purchased an ergonomic mouse for an employee, and the COI area was not informed of the purchase. It is not necessary to search for these types of expenses in the program area cost centres. If the CIO area is tracking these costs, however, they should be reported.
Question: We understand that we are only required to report all IT related costs and not IM costs. However, some CIOs also have responsibility for Information Management (IM). What are the differentiating costs between IM and IT that need to be considered?

Answer: The Government of Canada (GC) Profile of Internal Services distinguishes between Information Management (IM) and Information Technology (IT) Services. The two service domains are described in more detail in the GC Profile of Information Management Services - Profil des services de gestion de l'information du GC and the GC Profile of Information Technology Services respectively.

Note that this applies predominantly to the following expenditure categories: HR, External Services, Supplies, and Services Received and Provided expenses.

Since hardware and software are by nature IT, these expenses would still be captured.

In essence, departments should identify Information Management areas within the IM/IT area (or departmentally, if IM and IT are not combined), and treat these more or less like program areas. HR costs, training, and any professional services working outside of IT domains would be excluded; however the desktops and applications used in this area (such as GCDocs) would be included. Desktop applications which are not customized would be captured as DCE Software (most likely GC Corporate / Program-Specific Applications), while customized applications and in-house software would be captured in the ADDM Schedules (most likely in the ADDM application domain "Information Management").

Also note that, dependent on the role, you may actually include some IM-area staff within the IT Expenditure report. Examples would be Database Analysts (DBAs) and business analysts working on IM applications (if they are within the IT area).

Question: Could you advise on where the following activities would fit within the five IT Service groups?
  • Client Relationship management
  • IT service management
  • Change management
  • Configuration management
  • IT asset management
  • Executive management (CS-05+ EX-01+)
  • Executive operational support
  • Finance Support within IT division
  • HR support within IT division
  • Integrated planning of IM/IT
  • Training/courses activity cost

Answer: With respect to IT costs incurred outside of the organizations reporting to the CIO - the cost reporting should include total IT costs for the Department, including costs in Branches and Regions outside of the CIO’s organization. For other Internal Service costs (e.g. HR, Finance), the portion of other Internal Services costs attributable to IT should be included, either as a direct fee or as a burden on FTE costs. In the High-Level IT Cost Model, the rows should be covered under HR (FTEs), External Services (consultants), Software (e.g software specific to CRM, Change Management etc) and related HW, as applicable. The columns should be covered as follows:

  • Client Relationship management (CRM): While not part of the 3 COBIT processes, allocate under IT Program Management, as CRM typically deals with Planning & Organizing IT Services.
  • IT service management: Distribute across 5 Service Towers (e.g. Distributed Computing, Application/Database Development & Maintenance, etc.)
  • Change management: Distribute across 5 Service Towers
  • Configuration management: Distribute across 5 Service Towers
  • IT asset management: Distribute across 5 Service Towers
  • Executive management (CS05+EX01+): Allocate the CIO and other executive management that have broad oversight roles to IT Program Management. If executive management has oversight over one or more service groups, allocate on a pro-rated basis to those service groups.
  • Executive operational support: Allocate on the same basis as the executive(s).
  • Finance Support within IT division: IT Program Management
  • HR support within IT division: IT Program Management
  • Integrated planning of IM/IT: IT Program Management
  • Training/courses activity cost: Human Resources – allocate to the six columns.
Question: Should the following items be included in the IT Cost Model?
  • Development of E-Learning training material (not content)
  • Web page development (not content)
  • Final acceptance testing by the end user
  • Photocopier maintenance


  • Development of E-Learning training material (not content): Development of IT components of E-Learning training is an IT expenditure and should be captured in the Application / Database Development and Maintenance column.
  • Web page development (not content): Web application development (as opposed to content management) is an IT expenditure and should be captured in the Application / Database Development and Maintenance column.
  • Final acceptance testing by the end user: Final acceptance testing by the end user is a business expense. Any corresponding IT costs incurred to support the test are IT costs and should be captured in the Application / Database Development and Maintenance column.
  • Photo copier maintenance: Maintenance of any equipment (whether IT Hardware or non-IT equipment) is considered part of the cost of providing the equipment. Photocopiers that are connected to the network (and are typically capable of printing) are considered to be IT Hardware. Standalone photocopiers (i.e. not connected to the network) are considered to be non-IT equipment and all expenditures relating to them should be reported in the Supplies and Office Equipment row.
Question: Can you confirm that software and hardware "maintenance" costs are to be reported separately from "purchase" costs and put into the "External Services" rows?

Answer: The following extract from the “High-Level Cost Model Reporting Guide” identifies how hardware & software “maintenance” and “purchase” costs need to be reported.

  • Hardware: Costs to purchase, lease or rent IT hardware and components, Maintenance contracts
  • Software: Costs to purchase, lease or rent software, Maintenance / upgrade costs

Accordingly the Hardware and Software “maintenance” and “purchase” costs should be reported in the respective Hardware or Software rows and NOT in the “External Services” row. Note that the Hardware and Software costs should be attributed and reported under the respective IT services columns the assets are associated with (i.e. Distributed computing, Telecommunications, etc).

The External Services rows are specifically for costs of all external services (i.e. “services” purchased from entities external to the GC), including staff augmentation contracts (contractors), cloud computing expenses, and solutions or deliverables based contracts and outsourcing contracts.

Question: Should IT Expenditures reporting include Applications and/or Systems with Information Classification of "Top Secret" or "Protected C"?

Answer: The IT Expenditures reporting should exclude Applications and/or Systems with Information Classification of "Top Secret" or "Protected C". Only the IT Expenditures of Applications and/or Systems with Information Classification at or below "Secret" or "Protected B" should be included.

Question: How should expenditures be reported for a Grants and Contributions management system?

Answer: Grants and Contributions applications are considered to provide program related support from a “Whole of Government Framework” perspective. Therefore, the related application expenditures should be captured in Schedule 6 in the appropriate column(s) based on the outcome area(s) that the application supports and rows based on whether the expenditures relate to software, human resources, external services, etc. Moreover, the expenditures should also be included in the “Other” column of Schedule 5.

Question: Are subscriptions to analytical tools and database services considered IT expenses?

Answer: The nature of the service being provided will determine whether or not the expenditure should be considered IT. For example, subscription-based access to data, e.g. land title, legal or geographical data would generally not be considered IT expenditure. However, subscription-based access to services, such as those described in cloud computing, should be captured as IT expenditures.

Scope - IT Expenditure reporting[edit | edit source]

Question: What is the scope of departmental IT Expenditure reporting?

Answer: For IT Services provided by departments, the following should be included:

  • Actual, rather than budgeted expenditures,
  • IT Expenditure within Canada (International if possible),
  • Total spent, excluding depreciation costs,
  • Operating and capital expenditures, including all O&M expenditures,
  • One-time or project expenses as well as ongoing expenses,
  • Special purpose accommodation (e.g. data centres),
  • Expenditures related to providing or receiving IT services from or to another GC department.
  • Operating expenditures (OPEX) as well as Capital expenditures (CAPEX), provided that the department capitalizes assets, and has a capital vote. Departments which capitalize but do not have a capital vote can choose to report these expenditures on the respective CAPEX tab, but this is not required. Any capitalization costs which are not identified on a CAPEX tab should instead be included on the matching OPEX tab.
Question: How has the reporting changed with the introduction of Shared Services Canada (SSC)?

Answer: SSC reports as other departments do in terms of IT expenditures, from its reference levels (including appropriated amounts) including the case where expenditure is for IT services provided to other GC departments. If there are IT services provided by SSC on a cost recovery basis the expenditures will also be captured as “IT Services Provided” (negative amounts) by SSC and “IT Services Received” (positive amounts) by the receiving GC department.

Note: It is not necessary for departments to reach out to their provider or client departments to coordinate reporting. Departments should report on the basis of their own financial records, and TBS will cross-check reports.

Software[edit | edit source]

Question: Where should I place expenses for enterprise software such as SAP, and PeopleSoft. The guide seems to imply two different places?

Answer: The two most likely places to track software expenditures are in ADDM (Schedule 5 & Schedule 6) or under DCE (Schedule 4). Where the software should be placed falls into two general cases:

  • 'Case 1: Software which is managed and maintained by the department.'
    • In this case, there are developers who work on the software, and the software is being configured, managed, and/or developed by the department. As regards to SAP, this means that there is department-specific customization, and that the IT function has a direct responsibility for the management of the software.
    • For this situation, the software should be placed under ADDM (Schedule 5 & Schedule 6) and reported against the appropriate Application Domain and Outcome Area. For SAP, that would be Application Domain --> Financial Management, and Outcome Area --> Internal Services.
  • 'Case 2: Software is used by program areas, but there is minimal responsibility for the IT function to support or manage the software.'
    • In this case, the software is provided by a third party, and IT has a minimal involvement with the software. There is no customization of the software, and IT's responsibility is to ensure connectivity, to install patches, and to possibly reach out to the provider in the event of an outage. No customization or configuration is done by the IT shop. In an SAP example, the Finance group has little or no interaction with IT for management of the SAP instance, and reaches out directly to the provider for any issues or changes.
    • For this situation, the software would be expensed under DCE Services (Schedule 4) under the GC Corporate / Program-Specific Applications.

This rubric is usable in a general case, to differentiate between program-based applications which are or are not supported by IT. If IT is responsible for installation, patching, vendor interaction, and little else, then these applications would be expensed under DCE Services (Schedule 4). Software which implies customization and development by the IT function would be expensed under ADDM (Schedule 5 & Schedule 6).

Another way to look at this is organizationally. If you have a application development team with ties to the software, it will most likely fall into ADDM. If the Client Services / Workstation Management team is the only group linked to the software, it will mostly fall into DCE Services.

Facilities[edit | edit source]

Question: Since Shared Services Canada (SSC) has assumed control of all data centres managed by my department, do I have to report anything in the Facilities section?

Answer: Departments should only report items under Facilities if they are still considered primary operators of the facility space and are responsible for paying rental, utility, and other costs. Otherwise, if SSC is the owner/operator, SSC will report on these areas.

Question: We occupy space that is owned by PSPC. What is included in the 13% mark-up of salaries for accommodations? How do we report the costs for our use of that space?

Answer: These funds cover normal rent and operating and maintenance expenses that are encountered by PSPC in order to provide general purpose office accommodations to client departments. This includes base building fit-up. The 13% excludes tenant services and additional building services that go above norms, such as alterations or improvements to existing accommodation, or services that exceed the normal services specified in the occupancy agreement. PSPC is resourced to provide standard building services through the Space Envelope Regime. Any services beyond generic levels and normal hours of operation are not funded in the approved Space Envelopes and, therefore, fall under the financial responsibility and accountability of tenant departments. The 13% levy provides for the space occupied by people, so in reporting to the Cost Model it must be included as a component of HR cost. If departments incur additional IT-specific accommodation costs beyond those already covered in the 13%, they should be reported by departments as Facilities costs. Contact your Real Property officer for details.

The IT Expenditure Model automatically populates an amount for Office Accommodation based on 13% of salary. Additional expenditure that is to be included as a component of HR should be identified in the “Training, travel and Other HR Expenses” row.

Question: When a department has a Data Centre that is located within an Office building, currently the costs are included within Office building costs. Are such costs not covered under the 13% markup applicable to FTEs?

Answer: PSPC provides space up to the Space Envelope limit without distinction between office and special purpose. If space for your data centre is within the Space Envelope, then the cost of your data centre space is subsumed under the 13% markup for office accommodation. In such a case, you are asked to add a note related to Facilities cost in Schedule 5 - Notes, so that TBS can understand where your data centre space is accounted for in the Cost Model. If the space for your data centre is outside the Space Envelope, then that is not covered under 13% markup applicable to FTEs. In either case, please note that PSPC's 13% accommodation levy does not cover additional building costs typically associated with data centres such as uninterruptable power systems, enhanced physical security, alterations to floor load capacity, additional utilities, etc, so these should be duly captured as Facilities costs.

Question: Will PSPC provide departments the information with respect to utility costs for Data Centres in the buildings owned by PSPC but used by departments?

Answer: PSPC is not always able to distinguish the cost of electricity between office space and data centres located in office space. Utility costs are generally captured at the overall building or complex level. PSPC Real Property Branch is developing a capability for more granular collection of data, and while it does exist in a few locations, it will be a few years before this capability is more widely available. Consequently, PSPC will not provide information on related utility data for office space and data centres. Departments in this situation are advised to include a Comment that these additional data centre utility costs cannot be included in their Facilities cost at this time.

Human Resources - General[edit | edit source]

Question: Can we assume that our IM Costs (mainly human resources involved who in our case are part of our Branch) are NOT included in this IT Cost Model?

Answer: The IT costing is focused on IT and the IT Services Profile. IM has a community that is developing an IM Service Profile. The IT cost portion of IM must be 'included'. IM Resources in departments such as Librarians etc will not be included in this work. IT tools supporting IM e.g. Document Management Software (e.g. GCDocs) should be included.

Question: Are Web publishing resources to be included in the IT Cost Model?

Answer: Yes, these resources should be included if they are IT resources performing IT Services. Computer Science (CS) resources who are doing web designs and programming (included in Application Development/Maintenance Services in the IT Service Profile) as an example should be included. However, the FTEs in business areas, developing non-IT content or involved in Corporate Communications related to Web publishing, should be excluded.

Question: We know that we are not including the business-side analysts (e.g. FI's that configure SAP). Please confirm that we are not including business side IT project managers and IT program managers (sometimes, but not always, these people are CS's). In this context, the business side IT project managers have overall project responsibility, but IT project managers within CIO branch lead the IT part. [Amended]

Answer: To state simply:

  1. Business analysts who are not CS should only be included if they are in an IT role, or are part of the IT function.
  2. IT function staff should be included (CS or not), unless they are in an IM role, or in the rare cases where they are embedded Internal Service staff (HR, Finance, Legal) for which the answer for Q4 below would apply. Administrative IT function staff are counted as part of the IT Program Management category.
  3. IT Staff (if not CSs) should be included if they are in an IT role, even if they are not part of the IT function (meaning that they are in a business function)
  4. CS staff should always be included, regardless of role or where they are, unless they have temporarily or permanently changed their classification.
  5. Project managers (PMs) who are on the program side should be excluded.

Therefore, As you have correctly stated, Business Analysts undertaking activities related to financial configuration are excluded e.g. specifying financial coding for loading SAP tables, defining financial reports etc. Departments should not include the cost of Business Analysts working in Program areas or other Internal Service functions in the costs reported to TBS. However, IT staff operating in business functional areas who are undertaking activities related specifically to IT functions should be included e.g. technical configuration or programming of the financial systems etc. CS resources, regardless of role or where they are located in the organization, should be counted, as their classification implies links to an IT function. Only in cases where the CS has temporarily or permanently changed classification should they be ignored for purposes of IT Expenditure reporting.

Application Portfolio Management (APM)[edit | edit source]

Question: Do I include GCDocs in APM?

Answer: The official line is that departments don’t need to include GCdocs in their APM if they are hosted by another Department.

That said, some do include it in APM, but set the “Include in Portfolio Assessment” to “No – out of scope”.

There are situations where Departments have many instances of GCdocs, one local for Secret network, and one hosts by PSPC.

Some have also setup Dev/testing environments local, but set the Status to “In Development”.

So it varies, if it’s hosted, you don’t need to include it. The same goes for GCConnex and the GCTools, no need to include in APM.

Question: What value is to be used for the SSC Primary Data Location for Cloud applications? Should this field be left blank for Cloud apps? If so, then on the Dept. Dashboard, the number of cloud applications will show as 'Not Specified' in the Data Centre chart.

Answer: If you have an application in the cloud, please set the "SSC Primary Data Centre" field blank and set the "Deployment Model" appropriately. TBS will adjust the Dashboard for WLM accordingly to outline applications already migrated to the cloud.

Question: Just wondering what value is to be used for the SSC Primary Data Location for Cloud applications. Should this field be left blank for Cloud apps? If so, then on the Dept. Dashboard, the number of cloud applications will show as 'Not Specified' in the Data Centre chart. Please advise.

Answer: If you have an application in the cloud, please set the "SSC Primary Data Centre" field blank and set the "Deployment Model" appropriately.

TBS will adjust the Dashboard for WLM accordingly to outline applications already migrated to the cloud.

IT Plan[edit | edit source]

Question: Why an extract on Feb 28?

Answer: The Feb 28th extract is the next quarterly update after the Nov 15th extract, will be the basis for the written plan numbers.

Between the Nov 15th and Feb 28th, Departments are to work with their SSC Client Executive to confirm capacity and plans for the 2020-21 Fiscal year.

Question: What is SSC 3.0?

Answer: SSC 3.0 will take an enterprise approach that will build upon other Government of Canada programs such as “[Tell Us Once”], the Cloud First Adoption Strategy, and the Directive on Automated Decision-Making for the responsible use of artificial intelligence. SSC is committed to a team-based, collaborative approach that will engage, enable, and empower SSC employees to help provide the digital services Canadians expect. SSC 3.0 will support a government-wide Enterprise Digital Workplace Platform. This means federal public servants will have access to devices ranging from mobile to traditional workstations from anywhere. SSC 3.0 will prepare us to leverage new digital technologies to the fullest across the GC and to deliver the best possible services to Canadians. For more information please see: https://www.canada.ca/en/shared-services/ssc-3-enterprise-approach.html

Question: SSC to define when a BRD is needed vs. a ticket

Answer: Look at SSC catalogue, "how to order" is identified on their site Click on the "Order" button to determine which services require a BRD

Question: Can MAF Q1 apply to activities as well? Gate 6+ was identified in the question

Answer: TBS appreciates the need for clarification on indicator Q1. All IT Plan investments (projects or activities) will be considered as effort to improve the aging IT in the GC. So long as the IT Plan identifies the activity as an ongoing operational activity, it will be included in the numerator of Q1 B and Q1 C.

Question: Where can I get a list of projects which require DARB approval for MAF Q2?

Answer: A list of CEPP projects which may apply to Q2 MAF has been posted here: Question 2B - List of CEPP projects. It is up to the Departments to assess the PCRA level of each project against their OPMCA level.

Question: CIO reporting to DM - Many departments are concerned about the need for continuous updates to IT Plan as well as Deputy Head approval

Answer: TBS is not seeking additional attestation letters from your Deputy Head. However, as per the Policy, your Deputy Head in accountable IT Plan investments no matter when it is added to the system. Deputy Head sign-off is still required before submitting the online data to OCIO. It is up to the Departments to decide the appropriate process to ensure Deputy Head approval of all IT investments since this could have a significant demand on partner organizations. In addition, the ADM CEPP May 8th deck identified that CIOs need a seat at the executive table. The Feb 28th date simply represents the next known date for our usual Quarterly update of IT Plans for CEPP prioritization.

TBS will only be looking for two attestation pieces:

Signed attestation March 31 by Deputy Head

Checkbox in Clarity on Nov 15th to identify Deputy Head and CIO approval of itemized investments

Question: Can you clarify what is happening with services?

Answer: In previous years, services were entered/managed in Clarity and applications were linked to those. There was reference to a new application being implemented for services this year, but yet service information is still in Clarity. Can you clarify what is being done with regard to services? Are they being entered/managed in Clarity or in a different tool?

It’s best to work with the team in your Department who completed the GC Service Inventory to ensure that applications can aligned as much as possible. This list of GC services is stored in another system (outside of Clarity.)

Once the GC Service Inventory is available to our team, we will do some fit-gap reports and share with the community to identify next steps and impacts.

The intent is to eventually have a single list of Services with all application linked to those services in order to inherit the mission criticality.

Further guidance will be forthcoming from TBS regarding the intersection of GC Services, APM, Mission criticality and CBAS in the coming months.

The services team has developed a FAQ which touches upon this question:

En: https://gcconnex.gc.ca/file/view/50149777/faq-english?language=en

Fr: https://gcconnex.gc.ca/file/view/52484313/faq-francais?language=en

Question: November through March, how do you interpret "this fiscal year" in AQ1 and AQ2 if we are looking at next year’s planning? Is it the current year? Or next year?

Answer: The guide states "this fiscal year", however, this would not be effective for next year’s planning activities which are due November 15th. This “fiscal year” should represent the date a project passes Gate 3 (Business case and general readiness ◦For confirmation of funding and business outcomes).

Question: What is the right Level of Detail for the IT Plan items?

Answer: Many departments wonder, “What is the right level of detail for the IT Plan?” Should I report every project/run activity on a separate line item? Should I have 100 line items? 20? It is sometimes hard to know at what granularity to report so the following should give departments a bit of guidance.

Projects should be broken down individually. One line item should correspond to a departmental project.

Run activities should be regrouped and rolled up to a few line items. There are a few ways in which a department may choose to do so:

  • A natural breakdown that already exists internally, for example, by directorate or sectors
  • By service lines
  • By IT Expenditure categories
  • Or other groupings

Regrouping Run activities does not decrease their visibility, it simply bundles them up. These activities are non-discretionary, and do not require a high-level of granularity. TBS does analysis on all the IT Plans and if some discrepancies are noticed (i.e. the Run one year greatly differs from other years), it will be challenged.

Departmental IT Plan data from Clarity is used to report a demand profile at a high level. Analysis is done also at a high level, and when needed, TBS will engage with departments to further understand the data or to challenge it. No conclusions are made solely by TBS on departmental data. Furthermore, departments should be engaging with their account teams at SSC to ensure a common understanding of the data in Clarity.

Question: What if my project is not approved? Should I include it in the IT Plan?

Answer: Yes, the IT Plan is a plan and should give TBS & SSC a forecast for the next three years when it comes to departmental projects and run activities. In the essence of a continuous update model, departments should be updating Clarity regularly to account for new changes and additional information on projects and run activities. We are expecting departments to include a list of their approved projects as well as their forecasted projects/activities for the next two years (2020-2021).

Question: All my prioritization & achievability scores are now 0, where did they go and why?

Answer: When changes were brought to the GC Prioritization Framework, some of the questions were changed and some answers modified. Furthermore, all the questions were included in Clarity to facilitate reporting and generate scores automatically once the answers are selected and answered. In order for your scores to be generated, you will have to answer all of the prioritization and achievability questions.

Question: My score isn’t appearing even though I’ve answered all the questions in Clarity related to the GC Prioritization Framework, why?

Answer: In order for the score to appear, you need to answer all of the questions, save the page and Refresh it as well. This should make your score appear.

Question: What can I expect following the fall submission deadline?

Answer: The initial focus for the first reporting date following the fall deadline on Nov. 15 2019 will the new or additional work requiring SSC Services. Departments are required to include in their IT Plan any new work for SSC for 2020/21 and 2021/22. Including this work early on will give SSC the chance to lay the groundwork needed to be ready to provide the services needed by departments earlier and anticipate their workload.

TBS will conduct analysis and create a demand profile of departmental IT Plan data and work with SSC to create a full picture of demand and supply and what the next two years would look like. Here are a few things that will be analyzed:

  • looking at alignment to priorities
  • sustainability & end-of life, how departments are investing to maintain their application portfolio health
  • SSC services
  • other analysis
Question: How do I request a Clarity license?

Answer: Departments can submit their requests for licenses to CIOB-DPPI IT-Division-TI ZZCIOBDP@tbs-sct.gc.ca and their request will be actioned. Departments are required to notify if any licenses need to be deleted or replaced to keep the licenses as up to date as possible.

Question: How do I export data from Clarity?

Answer: When in Clarity, departments can go into their IT Plan dashboard, and for any given portlet[1], there will be a cog[2], if you click on it, a few options will pop up and you can click on Export to Excel (Data Only). This will give you a table with the columns you see in Clarity into Excel.

Clarity img1.png

  1. A portlet is a table populated with data from a source; in this case, this IT Plan data from your department.
  2. The wheel at the top right corner of the portlet.
Question: Is there a data loader for the IT Plan, like for APM?

Answer: No, there is no data loader for the IT Plan. APM has a linear relationship between its values unlike the IT Plan.

Question: Is the Prioritization Framework and the Decision Framework the same thing?

Answer: No, the Prioritization Framework are a set of questions that the departments answer in order to obtain a prioritization score and an achievability score. Following that, TBS applies a Decision Framework which is a set of business rules to further prioritize the items into three priority groups.

Question: Why do we compare this year’s IT Plan against last years Expenditures?

Answer: The intent of the MAF indicator is not to look at the problem with an auditing or evaluation lens by comparing the same year. We wanted to evaluate the planned expenses of the most recent IT Plan against facts in hand proving good judgment and completeness. It has a goal of nudging behaviour.

The two years can be different, which is the 15% buffer which we have added into the calculation. That said, further justifications to the MAF team can be submitted should there be a need to explain significant differences.

Need help? Contact us.

Envelope icon orange.png
Cop icon orange.png
GCconnex icon orange.png