Difference between revisions of "FAQ on Canadiana numbers (field 016)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
| − | == | + | == What are the generic Canadiana numbers used in Canadiana records? <span style="color:red>[New]</span> == |
{| class="wikitable" style="background:none; width:75%" | {| class="wikitable" style="background:none; width:75%" | ||
|+ | |+ | ||
| − | ! style="background-color:darkgray; border:solid 1px black; width:5%" | | + | ! style="background-color:darkgray; border:solid 1px black; width:5%" |Number |
| − | ! style="background-color:darkgray; border:solid 1px black; width:70%" | | + | ! style="background-color:darkgray; border:solid 1px black; width:70%" |Explanation |
|- | |- | ||
|style="vertical-align:top"|0000X0000F | |style="vertical-align:top"|0000X0000F | ||
| − | | | + | |This number identifies a duplicate record marked for deletion. |
| − | + | The notice includes note 667: Notice doublon, signalée pour suppression car remplacée par [numéro Canadiana de la notice à conserver] ([date]). | |
| − | + | For further information, see [[PFAN_-_Other_Documentation#Procedures_for_Duplicates|Procedures for Duplicates]] | |
|- | |- | ||
|style="vertical-align:top"|1111X1111F | |style="vertical-align:top"|1111X1111F | ||
| − | | | + | |This number identifies a record modified during a partial update of a work or expression record.<br> |
| − | + | The notice includes note 667: CETTE NOTICE A FAIT L'OBJET D'UNE MODIFICATION PARTIELLE. LE NUMÉRO CANADIANA GÉNÉRIQUE 1111X1111F DANS LA 016 DOIT ÊTRE REMPLACÉ PAR UN NUMÉRO UNIQUE LORSQUE LA NOTICE EST ÉVALUÉE. | |
| − | + | For further information, see [[PFAN_-_Other_Documentation#Procedure_for_partial_modification_of_records_describing_works_and_expressions|Procedure for partial modification of records describing works and expressions]] | |
|- | |- | ||
|style="vertical-align:top"|2222X2222F | |style="vertical-align:top"|2222X2222F | ||
Revision as of 16:08, 15 March 2024
May I reuse a Canadiana number?
You must never reuse a Canadiana number in a field 016 $a, if it's already been attributed, even if it was previously attributed to an authority record that has since been deleted. If a Canadiana number has been reused by mistake, a new one should be assigned (see Question 2).
What should I do if the same Canadiana number appears in two separate authority records?
If the same Canadiana number appears in two separate authority records in Canadiana, assign a new number in the most recent record (with the most recent date in field 008/00-05).
- The oldest authority record retains its Canadiana number (example: XXXXAXXXXF).
- A new Canadiana number should be attributed to the most recent record (example: YYYYAYYYYF) and the other number (XXXXAXXXXF) should be recorded in subfield $z in the same 016 field as the new number (recorded in $a).
What do I do if the same entity has two different Canadiana numbers in the Canadiana file and in NACO?
If the same entity does not have the same Canadiana number in the Canadiana file and in NACO, please report this situation to: pfan-fnap@bac-lac.gc.ca.
Who do I contact if I need a new list of Canadiana numbers for field 016? [New]
For a new list of Canadiana numbers, please send a request to: bac.servicesauxbibliotheques-libraryservices.lac@canada.ca.
Last update: 2022-03-22
