439
edits
Changes
Designing Public Engagements/Mighty team of one (view source)
Revision as of 14:27, 26 July 2018
, 14:27, 26 July 2018→Activity 4 - Methods
* Are there contingencies between certain goals that need to be met before others?
* Are there contingencies between certain goals that need to be met before others?
* Which Methods will help serve Goals at which stages?
* Which Methods will help serve Goals at which stages?
* Are certain Methods better for certain People?{"en":"Example 4 EN","fr":""}
* Are certain Methods better for certain People?
Image Description: Completed example for Activity 4. The image shows 3 columns, the first is a placeholder for different people or groups, the middle column is divided into the four quarters of the fiscal year, and the last column is a space to write down how you might measure whether goals have been met. Groups of People are organized into rows. The top row shows the Citizens sticky note in the first column, and has sticky notes for Online Discussion Forum in Q1 and on for Deliberative Polling in Q3. The next row is a combination of the Soft Drink manufacturers and Provincial Government, and it shows a sticky note for an Advisory Panel starting in Q2 extending to the end of Q3. The final row is for Provincial Government only, and shows a sticky note for Collaborative Planning Process in Q4.
==Wrap-up==
By now you have examined the underlying aspects to consider when building an engagement experience (People, Context, Goals) and have mapped out a possible Engagement Strategy (Methods). We hope these activities have helped you gain a better understanding of the details and climate surrounding the issue about which you are engaging the public.
<p>If you have questions that are specific to your own projects leave a comment.</p>
[[FR:Elaboration d’experiences de mobilisation du public/Une équipe formidable d'une]]
[[FR:Elaboration d’experiences de mobilisation du public/Une équipe formidable d'une]]