Difference between revisions of "Architecture Conventions"

From wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "For conventions specific to specific artifacts & deliverables see the definitions of those items on their particular pages.")
 
(Associations - QW vs ArchiMate)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
For conventions specific to specific artifacts & deliverables see the definitions of those items on their particular pages.
+
For conventions specific to specific [[SSC Artifacts and Diagrams|artifacts]] & [[SSC Architecture Deliverables and Reports|deliverables]] see the definitions of those items on their particular pages.
 +
 
 +
==== Diagram Naming Conventions ====
 +
* Always use the full name of the item.  An acronym, if applicable, may be placed in brackets.  E.g.:  System Monitoring Service (SMS)
 +
* Never put service/function/process in the name of the element 
 +
* Prepend diagram names (WIP) to indicate diagrams that are "Works in Progress".  E.g.:  "(WIP)Business Intake Process".
 +
* Prepend diagram names with a type/level if necessary. 
 +
** For example, if one has a Business Process Cooperation Diagram for a Segment, do  "Segment: Segment Name".  E.g.:  Segment: Connectivity
 +
** One might do several levels of diagram (conceptual, logical, physical).  To indicate the level, one might append a "- conceptual" to a name.  E.g.:  Monitoring System - conceptual, or Monitoring System - logical.
 +
* If a diagram is about a particular function/process/element in a larger scope, give the diagram the same name as the element.  e.g.:  A business process cooperation diagram describing the Data Center Facilities Management SSC service would be named:  "Data Center Facilities Management".
 +
* For SSC Service diagrams, one can prepend the title "Service:".  e.g.:  "Service: Data Center Facilities Management".
 +
 
 +
==== Associations (QualiWare vs ArchiMate) ====
 +
One can make both QualiWare associations (Breaks down to, RelationContext, Documents, Tags....) and/or ArchiMate relationships (lines of particular types).
 +
* For diagrams, always show the appropriate ArchiMate relationships.
 +
* Between diagrams, it's wise and helpful to do a Breaks down to association between objects/elements in your diagram to relevant sub-diagrams (details).
 +
* One may wish to make "hard" QualiWare associations between major functions/processes as "breaks down to" relationships as well.  Investigation required as to if this is necessary for the types of reporting we want to do.

Latest revision as of 14:28, 4 October 2019

For conventions specific to specific artifacts & deliverables see the definitions of those items on their particular pages.

Diagram Naming Conventions

  • Always use the full name of the item. An acronym, if applicable, may be placed in brackets. E.g.: System Monitoring Service (SMS)
  • Never put service/function/process in the name of the element
  • Prepend diagram names (WIP) to indicate diagrams that are "Works in Progress". E.g.: "(WIP)Business Intake Process".
  • Prepend diagram names with a type/level if necessary.
    • For example, if one has a Business Process Cooperation Diagram for a Segment, do "Segment: Segment Name". E.g.: Segment: Connectivity
    • One might do several levels of diagram (conceptual, logical, physical). To indicate the level, one might append a "- conceptual" to a name. E.g.: Monitoring System - conceptual, or Monitoring System - logical.
  • If a diagram is about a particular function/process/element in a larger scope, give the diagram the same name as the element. e.g.: A business process cooperation diagram describing the Data Center Facilities Management SSC service would be named: "Data Center Facilities Management".
  • For SSC Service diagrams, one can prepend the title "Service:". e.g.: "Service: Data Center Facilities Management".

Associations (QualiWare vs ArchiMate)

One can make both QualiWare associations (Breaks down to, RelationContext, Documents, Tags....) and/or ArchiMate relationships (lines of particular types).

  • For diagrams, always show the appropriate ArchiMate relationships.
  • Between diagrams, it's wise and helpful to do a Breaks down to association between objects/elements in your diagram to relevant sub-diagrams (details).
  • One may wish to make "hard" QualiWare associations between major functions/processes as "breaks down to" relationships as well. Investigation required as to if this is necessary for the types of reporting we want to do.