Talk:Business Architecture/Past Sessions
2022-04-25: Exploration - Minimal Viable Enterprise and Business Architecture Practice
Quick notes from the discussions
1- Clarifying the purpose and scoping the work:
- Is it worthy to pursue this effort of defining a MVEBA?
- What form should it take? What deliverable(s) / work package(s) should it include?
- How much effort can be put into it? Who’s willing to contribute?
2- Key questions raised during the 2022-04-25 session that should be further discussed:
- How should the EA/EBA practice support Product Management and agile transformation? What does that mean for a MVEBA?
- What is the right balance between EA “development” and EA as an internal consultancy service? In a general sense and specifically to each of the EA OM patterns
- Should a Minimum Viable BA be defined outside the scope of EA? Within EA? Or both?
=Author and Contact Information
[Steven Bednikoff] [Conseiller principal en architecture d’entreprise, Direction générale de la transformation numérique] [Santé Canada et Agence de la santé publique du Canada / Gouvernement du Canada] [steven.bednikoff@hc-sc.gc.ca / Tél.: 438-355-8387]
Senior advisor, enterprise architecture, Digital Transformation Branch Health Canada and Public Health Agency of Canada / Government of Canada steven.bednikoff@hc-sc.gc.ca / Tel.: 438-355-8387
Author and Contact Information
Steven Bednikoff Conseiller principal en architecture d’entreprise, Direction générale de la transformation numérique Santé Canada et Agence de la santé publique du Canada / Gouvernement du Canada steven.bednikoff@hc-sc.gc.ca / Tél.: 438-355-8387
Senior advisor, enterprise architecture, Digital Transformation Branch Health Canada and Public Health Agency of Canada / Government of Canada steven.bednikoff@hc-sc.gc.ca / Tel.: 438-355-8387
