Changes

10 bytes removed ,  15:05, 16 May 2023
m
Line 55: Line 55:  
== Can I correct the AAP in an existing notice that contains the note " CETTE NOTICE VERSÉE EN LOT DOIT ÊTRE ÉVALUÉE AVANT D'ÊTRE UTILISÉE, POUR S'ASSURER QU'ELLE RÉPONDE AUX NORMES DU PFAN "? ==
 
== Can I correct the AAP in an existing notice that contains the note " CETTE NOTICE VERSÉE EN LOT DOIT ÊTRE ÉVALUÉE AVANT D'ÊTRE UTILISÉE, POUR S'ASSURER QU'ELLE RÉPONDE AUX NORMES DU PFAN "? ==
   −
Any AAP in a record with this note should be reassessed. Care should be taken to ensure that the AAP is consistent with the standards of the PFAN, and therefore with the application of the PS for [[PFAN_-_PFAN_Policy_Statements#9.2.2.5.3.2C_Names_found_in_a_non-preferred_script_.5BNEW.5D|9.2.2.5.3]].
+
Any AAP in a record with this note should be reassessed. Care should be taken to ensure that the AAP is consistent with the standards of the PFAN, and therefore with the application of the PS for [[PFAN_-_PFAN_Policy_Statements#9.2.2.5.3.2C_Names_found_in_a_non-preferred_script|9.2.2.5.3]].
    
== Does the PFAN plan to use the MARC 880 (alternative script) field or use the 4XX fields instead? ==
 
== Does the PFAN plan to use the MARC 880 (alternative script) field or use the 4XX fields instead? ==