Line 59: |
Line 59: |
| ==Mandate, Vision, Mission, Values and more...==<!-- ROX Modified text to lead to subpages. Reason: To remove one of the sections below. Subpage links covered in menu. --> | | ==Mandate, Vision, Mission, Values and more...==<!-- ROX Modified text to lead to subpages. Reason: To remove one of the sections below. Subpage links covered in menu. --> |
| | | |
− | <p>The Administrative Tribunals Support Service of Canada was established to build capacity to meet the needs of administrative tribunals, find efficiencies through economies of scale, and improve access to justice for Canadians. The following presentation provides an overview of the ATSSC: [[Media:ATSSC_Overview.pptx]]. </p><div class="card"> | + | <p>The Administrative Tribunals Support Service of Canada was established to build capacity to meet the needs of administrative tribunals, find efficiencies through economies of scale, and improve access to justice for Canadians. </p> |
| + | <p>Consult the following presentations for an overview of the ATSSC: </p> |
| + | |
| + | * <p>[[Media:ATSSC_Overview.pptx]] </p> |
| + | * <p>[[Media:stretegic_pillars.pdf]] </p><div class="card"> |
| ===<span class="checkbox" aria-hidden="true">✔</span>Our Mandate=== | | ===<span class="checkbox" aria-hidden="true">✔</span>Our Mandate=== |
| <div class="card-body mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"> | | <div class="card-body mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"> |
Line 142: |
Line 146: |
| <p>'''Administrative tribunals:'''</p> | | <p>'''Administrative tribunals:'''</p> |
| | | |
− | * Were created to provide justice between citizens and the government. | + | *Were created to provide justice between citizens and the government. |
− | * Also recognized as “Expert Tribunals”, they supply expertise and knowledge in a specific area of law. | + | *Also recognized as “Expert Tribunals”, they supply expertise and knowledge in a specific area of law. |
− | * Get their powers from a statute, allowing decision-makers to decide only on those matters over which their tribunal has jurisdiction under the statute. | + | *Get their powers from a statute, allowing decision-makers to decide only on those matters over which their tribunal has jurisdiction under the statute. |
− | * Allow for matters to be heard and decisions to be made more quickly and efficiently. | + | *Allow for matters to be heard and decisions to be made more quickly and efficiently. |
− | * Alleviate workload and free up time for the courts (which are more costly to operate). | + | *Alleviate workload and free up time for the courts (which are more costly to operate). |
| | | |
| '''Natural justice and procedural fairness are procedures that administrative tribunal decision-makers must follow to act fairly; these include:''' | | '''Natural justice and procedural fairness are procedures that administrative tribunal decision-makers must follow to act fairly; these include:''' |
| | | |
− | * Notice: The applicant must be given adequate notice of the nature of the proceedings and of the issue to be decided. | + | *Notice: The applicant must be given adequate notice of the nature of the proceedings and of the issue to be decided. |
− | * Disclosure: Depending on the nature of the case, all evidence to be used against an applicant must be disclosed. | + | *Disclosure: Depending on the nature of the case, all evidence to be used against an applicant must be disclosed. |
− | * Opportunity to present one’s case and to respond: The applicant must be provided with an opportunity to present whatever evidence they wish to be considered. While the right to be heard generally implies a hearing, it does not always mean an oral hearing. Submissions can be made in writing. | + | *Opportunity to present one’s case and to respond: The applicant must be provided with an opportunity to present whatever evidence they wish to be considered. While the right to be heard generally implies a hearing, it does not always mean an oral hearing. Submissions can be made in writing. |
− | * Right to an impartial decision maker and freedom of bias | + | *Right to an impartial decision maker and freedom of bias |
− | * Institutional independence and the person who hears the case must decide | + | *Institutional independence and the person who hears the case must decide |
− | * Duty to consider all the evidence | + | *Duty to consider all the evidence |
| | | |
| Consult the [https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/administrative-tribunals# Canadian Encyclopedia] for additional information on administrative tribunals. | | Consult the [https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/administrative-tribunals# Canadian Encyclopedia] for additional information on administrative tribunals. |
Line 174: |
Line 178: |
| </div> | | </div> |
| <div class="section col-sm-12 col-lg-8" id="ATSSC"> | | <div class="section col-sm-12 col-lg-8" id="ATSSC"> |
− | ==ATSSC Intranet== | + | ==ATSSC Intranet == |
| Visit the [https://intranet.atssc-scdata.gc.ca/index-en.html ATSSC's intranet] regularly to read important staff messages. You will also find useful information, tools and resources.<!-- Back to top button --> | | Visit the [https://intranet.atssc-scdata.gc.ca/index-en.html ATSSC's intranet] regularly to read important staff messages. You will also find useful information, tools and resources.<!-- Back to top button --> |
| <div class="btn-backtotop fixed"><span class="arrow up"></span></div> | | <div class="btn-backtotop fixed"><span class="arrow up"></span></div> |