Changes

Line 23: Line 23:     
=== Bias Controls Across the SERLO/WFA Lifecycle ===
 
=== Bias Controls Across the SERLO/WFA Lifecycle ===
 +
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|Stage
 +
|Official Activity (PSC/TBS)
 +
|Where Bias Can Enter (Official Framing)
 +
|Corrective Actions (Official Requirements)
 +
|-
 +
|Planing
 +
|Determine the desired current and future state of the organization; determine the affected part(s); identify positions and affected employees; notify OCHRO/TBS, bargaining agents, and employees.
 +
|Defining the affected part(s) at a level that is not functionally justified can isolate specific employees.
 +
|Document the functional rationale for the affected part(s) and link to business/HR plans; issue required written notifications to OCHRO/TBS, bargaining agents, and employees per SERLO steps.
 +
|-
 +
|Establishing the Merit Criteria
 +
|Establish the Statement of Merit Criteria: essential qualifications, asset qualifications, operational requirements, organizational needs.
 +
|Over‑tailored asset qualifications or experience statements that function as proxies for tenure can distort merit and exclude already‑qualified employees.
 +
|Write qualifications in plain, neutral, assessable language; distinguish essential vs asset; justify operational requirements; define organizational needs aligned to current and future state.
 +
|-
 +
|Conducting the Assessment
 +
|Determine assessment methods; complete Step 9: Identification of biases and barriers; conduct assessments with qualified assessors and respect duty to accommodate.
 +
|Use of subjective factors (e.g., undefined “fit” or “visibility”) introduces affinity bias and undermines fair assessment.
 +
|Apply structured tools (structured interviews, structured reference checks, standardized scoring) and accommodation guidance; ensure assessor competency and official language capacity; document the bias/barrier review before assessment.
 +
|-
 +
|Alteration
 +
|Administer alternation for opting or surplus employees within the core public administration at the same group/level or equivalent, subject to meeting essential qualifications and language requirements; options chosen within 120 days when no GRJO is provided.
 +
|Opaque “taps on the shoulder” and informal matching can exclude eligible employees; inconsistent application of equivalency rules creates unfair access.
 +
|Centralize and publicize alternation opportunities; apply equivalency criteria consistently; verify the employee meets the position’s essential qualifications and language profile before approving the alternation.
 +
|-
 +
|Selection, Notice and Reasons
 +
|Conduct selection for retention or lay‑off (SERLO); provide written notice; record reasons for selection; then administer Priority Administration for surplus/lay‑off entitlements in the proper order of precedence.
 +
|Relying on outdated workforce data to justify that representation meets organizational needs can misalign decisions with current Employment Equity Act obligations.
 +
|Use current employment equity workforce availability and representation data to inform organizational needs; ensure compliance with Appointment Policy obligations (employment equity, official languages, duty to accommodate); respect PSC priority entitlements and order of precedence.
 +
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
!'''Step'''
 
!'''Step'''
 
!'''Process (official)'''
 
!'''Process (official)'''
!'''Equity Risk (official framing)'''
+
!'''Equity Risk'''  
!'''Safeguards (official requirements + good practice)'''
+
!'''Safeguards'''  
!'''Legal/Policy Requirements — Direct Quotes (with source)'''
+
!'''Legal/Policy Requirements'''  
 
|-
 
|-
 
!'''1. Define the “Affected Part” of the Organization'''
 
!'''1. Define the “Affected Part” of the Organization'''
Line 34: Line 67:  
|If the affected part(s) are defined '''too narrowly''' without functional justification, selections can isolate specific employees or equity groups.
 
|If the affected part(s) are defined '''too narrowly''' without functional justification, selections can isolate specific employees or equity groups.
 
|• Document the '''functional rationale''' tied to business/HR plans before assessment. • Use structured notifications and records.
 
|• Document the '''functional rationale''' tied to business/HR plans before assessment. • Use structured notifications and records.
|“'''Step 2: Determine the affected part(s) of the organization'''.” (PSC, ''Selection of employees for retention or lay‑off: Guide for managers and HR specialists'') [[/www.ceiu-seic.ca/alternation faq|[ceiu-seic.ca]]] — “Where the deputy head determines… that '''some but not all of the employees in any part of the deputy head’s organization will be laid off''', the employees to be laid off '''shall be selected in accordance with the regulations of the Commission'''.” (PSEA, '''s.64(2)''') [[/www.justice.gc.ca/eng/abt-apd/pgbap-pacsp.html|[justice.gc.ca]]] — “Workforce adjustment… when it has been determined that a position is no longer required due to '''lack of work''', '''discontinuance of a function''', '''relocation''', or an '''alternative delivery initiative'''.” (Canada.ca WFA overview) [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/publications/2025-2026-departmental-plan/gba-plus-supplementary-info-table.html|[canada.ca]]]
+
|“Step 2: Determine the affected part(s) of the organization.” (PSC, ''Selection of employees for retention or lay‑off: Guide for managers and HR specialists'') [[/www.ceiu-seic.ca/alternation faq|[ceiu-seic.ca]]] — “Where the deputy head determines… that some but not all of the employees in any part of the deputy head’s organization will be laid off, the employees to be laid off shall be selected in accordance with the regulations of the Commission.” (PSEA, s.64(2)) [[/www.justice.gc.ca/eng/abt-apd/pgbap-pacsp.html|[justice.gc.ca]]] — “Workforce adjustment… when it has been determined that a position is no longer required due to lack of work, discontinuance of a function, relocation, or an alternative delivery initiative.” (Canada.ca WFA overview) [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/publications/2025-2026-departmental-plan/gba-plus-supplementary-info-table.html|[canada.ca]]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
!'''2. Establish Merit Criteria (SoMC)'''
 
!'''2. Establish Merit Criteria (SoMC)'''
|Deputy Head determines '''qualifications, requirements, and organizational needs''' for the SERLO: • '''Essential qualifications''' (including official language proficiency) • '''Asset qualifications''' '''Operational requirements''' '''Organizational needs'''
+
|Deputy Head determines qualifications, requirements, and organizational needs for the SERLO: • Essential qualifications (including official language proficiency) • Asset qualifications • Operational requirements • Organizational needs
|• Over‑tailored '''asset qualifications''' or experience statements that act as '''proxies for tenure'''. • '''Operational requirements''' that create barriers.
+
|• Over‑tailored asset qualifications or experience statements that act as proxies for tenure. • Operational requirements that create barriers.
|• Write qualifications in '''plain, neutral, assessable''' language; distinguish essential vs. asset. • Justify '''operational requirements''' and define '''organizational needs''' aligned to the current/future state. • Respect '''duty to accommodate''' and '''employment equity obligations'''.
+
|• Write qualifications in plain, neutral, assessable language; distinguish essential vs. asset. • Justify operational requirements and define organizational needs aligned to the current/future state. • Respect duty to accommodate and employment equity obligations.
|“The deputy head must determine '''(a) the essential qualifications… and any additional qualifications… as an asset'''; and '''(b) any relevant current or future operational requirements or needs of the organization'''.” (PSER, '''s.22(2)''') — “Deputy heads must '''respect the duty to accommodate throughout the appointment process''' [and] '''respect employment equity obligations throughout the appointment process'''.” (PSC ''Appointment Policy'') [[/syndicatafpc.ca/node/12432|[syndicatafpc.ca]]] — “'''Organizational needs – employment equity, placing employees affected by workforce adjustment,''' respecting a land claims agreement, when they apply.” (VAC, ''How to read a job advertisement'') — “Employers… have an obligation to '''adjust rules, policies or practices''' to enable everyone to participate fully… called the '''duty to accommodate'''.” (Canadian Human Rights Commission)
+
|“The deputy head must determine (a) the essential qualifications… and any additional qualifications… as an asset; and (b) any relevant current or future operational requirements or needs of the organization.” (PSER, s.22(2)) — “Deputy heads must respect the duty to accommodate throughout the appointment process [and] respect employment equity obligations throughout the appointment process.” (PSC ''Appointment Policy'') [[/syndicatafpc.ca/node/12432|[syndicatafpc.ca]]] — “Organizational needs – employment equity, placing employees affected by workforce adjustment, respecting a land claims agreement, when they apply.” (VAC, ''How to read a job advertisement'') — “Employers… have an obligation to adjust rules, policies or practices to enable everyone to participate fully… called the duty to accommodate.” (Canadian Human Rights Commission)
 
|-
 
|-
 
!'''3. Conduct the Assessment'''
 
!'''3. Conduct the Assessment'''
|• Determine assessment methods (e.g., review of past performance, interviews, exams). • '''Step 9: Identify biases and barriers''' before applying any method. • Assess employees using structured tools; ensure assessor qualifications and official languages obligations are met.
+
|• Determine assessment methods (e.g., review of past performance, interviews, exams). • Step 9: Identify biases and barriers before applying any method. • Assess employees using structured tools; ensure assessor qualifications and official languages obligations are met.
|Use of '''subjective factors''' (e.g., undefined “fit” or “visibility”) introduces '''affinity bias''', undermining fair selection among already‑qualified employees.
+
|Use of subjective factors (e.g., undefined “fit” or “visibility”) introduces affinity bias, undermining fair selection among already‑qualified employees.
|• Apply '''structured''' tools (structured interviews, structured reference checks, standardized scoring). • '''Document the bias/barrier review''' prior to assessment. • Provide and implement '''accommodations'''; ensure assessor competence and official language capacity.
+
|• Apply structured tools (structured interviews, structured reference checks, standardized scoring). • Document the bias/barrier review prior to assessment. • Provide and implement accommodations; ensure assessor competence and official language capacity.
|“The deputy head may… use '''any assessment method'''… such as a '''review of past performance and accomplishments, interviews and examinations'''.” (PSER, '''s.22(4)''') — “Before using an assessment method, the deputy head '''must conduct an evaluation to identify whether the assessment method… includes or creates biases or barriers'''… and '''make reasonable efforts to remove''' or '''mitigate''' [them].” (PSER, '''s.22(5)''') — “'''Step 9: Identification of biases and barriers.'''” (PSC ''SERLO Guide'') [[/www.ceiu-seic.ca/alternation faq|[ceiu-seic.ca]]] — “Ensure that those conducting the assessment '''have the necessary competencies…''' to assess the qualifications.” (PSC ''Appointment Policy'') [[/syndicatafpc.ca/node/12432|[syndicatafpc.ca]]]
+
|“The deputy head may… use any assessment method… such as a review of past performance and accomplishments, interviews and examinations.” (PSER, s.22(4)) — “Before using an assessment method, the deputy head must conduct an evaluation to identify whether the assessment method… includes or creates biases or barriers… and make reasonable efforts to remove or mitigate [them].” (PSER, s.22(5)) — “Step 9: Identification of biases and barriers.” (PSC ''SERLO Guide'') [[/www.ceiu-seic.ca/alternation faq|[ceiu-seic.ca]]] — “Ensure that those conducting the assessment have the necessary competencies… to assess the qualifications.” (PSC ''Appointment Policy'') [[/syndicatafpc.ca/node/12432|[syndicatafpc.ca]]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
!'''4. Determine Organizational Needs (Representation Analysis)'''
 
!'''4. Determine Organizational Needs (Representation Analysis)'''
|• Establish '''organizational needs'''; Employment Equity can be applied when justified. • Perform a '''representation gap analysis''' using current availability/representation.
+
|• Establish organizational needs; Employment Equity can be applied when justified. • Perform a representation gap analysis using current availability/representation.
|Reliance on '''outdated 2021 workforce availability''' can misstate current gaps and embed bias in selections.
+
|Reliance on outdated 2021 workforce availability can misstate current gaps and embed bias in selections.
|• Use '''current EE data''' (availability & representation) when defining organizational needs. • Where only older data exist, apply '''documented projection methodology''' (internal) to avoid fettering discretion; decisions must still rest on '''PSER s.22(2)''' and PSC '''Appointment Policy''' obligations.
+
|• Use current EE data (availability & representation) when defining organizational needs. • Where only older data exist, apply documented projection methodology (internal) to avoid fettering discretion; decisions must still rest on PSER s.22(2) and PSC Appointment Policy obligations.
|“The deputy head must determine… '''operational requirements or needs of the organization'''.” (PSER, '''s.22(2)(b)''') — “'''Organizational needs – employment equity'''… when they apply.” (VAC) — “Deputy heads must… '''respect employment equity obligations''' throughout the appointment process.” (PSC ''Appointment Policy'') [[/syndicatafpc.ca/node/12432|[syndicatafpc.ca]]] — “Public service‑wide initiatives on equity… '''representation and workforce availability''' reporting to address gaps.” (TBS ''Employment Equity Annual Report 2023–24'') [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/publications/2025-2026-departmental-plan/gba-plus-supplementary-info-table.html|[canada.ca]]]
+
|“The deputy head must determine… operational requirements or needs of the organization.” (PSER, s.22(2)(b)) — “Organizational needs – employment equity… when they apply.” (VAC) — “Deputy heads must… respect employment equity obligations throughout the appointment process.” (PSC ''Appointment Policy'') [[/syndicatafpc.ca/node/12432|[syndicatafpc.ca]]] — “Public service‑wide initiatives on equity… representation and workforce availability reporting to address gaps.” (TBS ''Employment Equity Annual Report 2023–24'') [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/publications/2025-2026-departmental-plan/gba-plus-supplementary-info-table.html|[canada.ca]]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
!'''5. Selection and Notification'''
 
!'''5. Selection and Notification'''
|• Conduct SERLO selection; establish merit list and determine the '''cut‑off''' for retention vs. lay‑off. • '''Provide written notice''' to laid‑off and retained employees. • '''Record reasons''' for selection. • Administer '''priority entitlements'''.
+
|• Conduct SERLO selection; establish merit list and determine the cut‑off for retention vs. lay‑off. • Provide written notice to laid‑off and retained employees. • Record reasons for selection. • Administer priority entitlements.
|A '''cut‑off line''' that produces '''adverse impact''' on a protected group without mitigation may contravene EE obligations and fairness principles.
+
|A cut‑off line that produces adverse impact on a protected group without mitigation may contravene EE obligations and fairness principles.
|• Conduct a '''GBA Plus/adverse impact review''' before issuing letters. • Use current EE data to confirm no disproportionate impact. • Issue '''PSER s.21''' compliant notices; '''record the reasons''' for the selection (SERLO guide Step 14). • Manage '''priority entitlements''' per PSC (order of precedence).
+
|• Conduct a GBA Plus/adverse impact review before issuing letters. • Use current EE data to confirm no disproportionate impact. • Issue PSER s.21 compliant notices; record the reasons for the selection (SERLO guide Step 14). • Manage priority entitlements per PSC (order of precedence).
|“'''Provide written notice'''… Step 13; and '''record the reasons for the selection'''… Step 14.” (PSC ''SERLO Guide'') [[/www.ceiu-seic.ca/alternation faq|[ceiu-seic.ca]]] — “A deputy head must, '''before laying off an employee''', provide a '''written notice'''… including: '''(a) statement'''; '''(b) reason'''; '''(c) right to complaint'''; '''(d) date'''; '''(e) lay‑off date or later advice'''.” (PSER, '''s.21(1)(a)–(e)''') [[/www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/240209/dq240209a-eng.htm|[www150.statcan.gc.ca]]] — “Priority for appointment… shall be given… to a person '''laid off pursuant to subsection 64(1)'''.” (PSEA, '''s.41(4)''') [[/psacunion.ca/sites/psac/files/2025-psac-wfa-members-guide.pdf|[psacunion.ca]]]
+
|“Provide written notice… Step 13; and record the reasons for the selection… Step 14.” (PSC ''SERLO Guide'') [[/www.ceiu-seic.ca/alternation faq|[ceiu-seic.ca]]] — “A deputy head must, before laying off an employee, provide a written notice… including: (a) statement; (b) reason; (c) right to complaint; (d) date; (e) lay‑off date or later advice.” (PSER, s.21(1)(a)–(e)) [[/www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/240209/dq240209a-eng.htm|[www150.statcan.gc.ca]]] — “Priority for appointment… shall be given… to a person laid off pursuant to subsection 64(1).” (PSEA, s.41(4)) [[/psacunion.ca/sites/psac/files/2025-psac-wfa-members-guide.pdf|[psacunion.ca]]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
!'''6. Alternation'''
 
!'''6. Alternation'''
|• Administer '''alternation''' for eligible '''opting''' or '''surplus''' employees within the '''core public administration'''. • Verify '''essential qualifications''' and official languages for the position to be alternated into; apply '''equivalency''' rules.
+
|• Administer alternation for eligible opting or surplus employees within the core public administration. • Verify essential qualifications and official languages for the position to be alternated into; apply equivalency rules.
|Opaque or informal matching ('''“hidden job market”''') excludes eligible employees; inconsistent equivalency application produces unfair access.
+
|Opaque or informal matching (“hidden job market”) excludes eligible employees; inconsistent equivalency application produces unfair access.
|• '''Centralize and transparently post''' alternation opportunities (departmental and GC‑wide forums). • Apply '''equivalency''' consistently; verify '''essential qualifications''' and official language profile before approval. • Offer meeting to explain '''denials'''.
+
|• Centralize and transparently post alternation opportunities (departmental and GC‑wide forums). • Apply equivalency consistently; verify essential qualifications and official language profile before approval. • Offer meeting to explain denials.
|“'''All departments or organizations must participate in the alternation process.'''” (NJC WFAD, '''s.6.3.1''') [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]] — “'''An alternation occurs when an opting employee… exchanges positions with a non‑affected employee'''… under Part VI.” (NJC WFAD, '''s.6.3.2''') [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]] — “The opting employee moving into the unaffected position '''must meet the requirements for appointment'''… including '''language requirements'''.” (NJC WFAD, '''s.6.3.7''') [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]] — “Alternation should normally occur at the '''same group and level'''… or '''equivalent''' (max rate of pay '''no more than 6% higher''').” (NJC WFAD, '''s.6.3.9''') [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]] — “An alternation '''must occur on a given date'''… no ‘domino’ or ‘future considerations’.” (NJC WFAD, '''s.6.3.10''') [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]] — “Employees not in receipt of a '''GRJO''' have '''120 days''' to consider the three options.” (NJC WFAD, '''s.6.1.2''') [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]]
+
|“All departments or organizations must participate in the alternation process.” (NJC WFAD, s.6.3.1) [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]] — “An alternation occurs when an opting employee… exchanges positions with a non‑affected employee… under Part VI.” (NJC WFAD, s.6.3.2) [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]] — “The opting employee moving into the unaffected position must meet the requirements for appointment… including language requirements.” (NJC WFAD, s.6.3.7) [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]] — “Alternation should normally occur at the same group and level… or equivalent (max rate of pay no more than 6% higher).” (NJC WFAD, s.6.3.9) [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]] — “An alternation must occur on a given date… no ‘domino’ or ‘future considerations’.” (NJC WFAD, s.6.3.10) [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]] — “Employees not in receipt of a GRJO have 120 days to consider the three options.” (NJC WFAD, s.6.1.2) [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]]
 
|}
 
|}
----
  −
  −
== Expanded, step‑specific guidance (official terms only) ==
  −
  −
=== Step 1 — Scope and notifications ===
  −
  −
* '''Define affected part(s)''' against '''current/future state'''; keep scope functional, not personal. [[/www.ceiu-seic.ca/alternation faq|[ceiu-seic.ca]]]
  −
* '''Authority to lay off:''' “Where the services of an employee are no longer required… the deputy head may… '''lay off the employee'''.” (PSEA, '''s.64(1)''') [[/www.justice.gc.ca/eng/abt-apd/pgbap-pacsp.html|[justice.gc.ca]]]
  −
* '''If only some employees:''' selection '''must''' follow PSC regulations. (PSEA, '''s.64(2)''') [[/www.justice.gc.ca/eng/abt-apd/pgbap-pacsp.html|[justice.gc.ca]]]
  −
  −
=== Step 2 — Merit criteria (SoMC) ===
  −
  −
* '''Define''' essential & asset qualifications; '''operational requirements'''; '''organizational needs'''. (PSER, '''s.22(2)''')
  −
* '''Employment equity & accommodation''' obligations apply. (PSC ''Appointment Policy'') [[/syndicatafpc.ca/node/12432|[syndicatafpc.ca]]]
  −
* '''Operational requirements''' (e.g., travel, shift work) must be justified and not used to '''circumvent accommodation'''; apply the '''duty to accommodate'''.
  −
  −
=== Step 3 — Assessment methods + bias/barrier review ===
  −
  −
* '''Methods:''' review of past performance, interviews, examinations. (PSER, '''s.22(4)''')
  −
* '''Bias/barrier requirement:''' conduct '''evaluation''' to identify and '''remove/mitigate''' biases or barriers '''before''' use. (PSER, '''s.22(5)''')
  −
* '''Second official language assessment:''' must use the same methods as '''appointments'''. (PSER, '''s.22(6)''')
  −
  −
=== Step 4 — Organizational needs (representation analysis) ===
  −
  −
* '''Authority:''' deputy head may set '''needs of the organization''' (including EE). (PSER, '''s.22(2)(b)''')
  −
* '''EE as organizational need:''' acknowledged in GC staffing context. (VAC, ''How to read a job advertisement'')
  −
* '''Use current EE data:''' align with TBS '''availability/representation''' reporting. [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/publications/2025-2026-departmental-plan/gba-plus-supplementary-info-table.html|[canada.ca]]]
  −
* '''Projection methodology (internal, not prescribed by law):''' When only 2021 data exist, some organizations use '''documented projections''' (e.g., Attainment Rate ÷ '''1.25''' for racialized groups; ÷ '''1.10''' for Indigenous peoples) to approximate '''2025 availability'''. Decisions must remain grounded in '''PSER s.22(2)''' and '''PSC Appointment Policy''' obligations. [[/syndicatafpc.ca/node/12432|[syndicatafpc.ca]]]
  −
  −
=== Step 5 — Selection, notice, reasons, priority ===
  −
  −
* '''Selection''' and '''recording reasons''' are explicit SERLO steps. (PSC ''SERLO Guide'', Steps 12–14) [[/www.ceiu-seic.ca/alternation faq|[ceiu-seic.ca]]]
  −
* '''Written notice content''' requirements (statement, reason, right to complaint, date, lay‑off date or later written advice). (PSER, '''s.21(1)''') [[/www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/240209/dq240209a-eng.htm|[www150.statcan.gc.ca]]]
  −
* '''Priority entitlements''' for laid‑off persons. (PSEA, '''s.41(4)'''; PSER priority provisions) [[/psacunion.ca/sites/psac/files/2025-psac-wfa-members-guide.pdf|[psacunion.ca]]]
  −
  −
=== Step 6 — Alternation (Part VI, NJC WFAD) ===
  −
  −
* '''Participation is mandatory''' across departments. (NJC WFAD, '''s.6.3.1''') [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]]
  −
* '''Eligibility:''' opting or surplus employees; same group/level or '''equivalent'''; must '''meet essential qualifications''' and '''language''' requirements for the position they enter. (NJC WFAD, '''s.6.3.2, s.6.3.7, s.6.3.9''') [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]]
  −
* '''Process integrity:''' alternation '''occurs on a single date'''; if denied, '''meeting to explain rationale''' at employee request. (NJC WFAD, '''s.6.3.10, s.6.3.8''') [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]]
  −
* '''Opting period:''' '''120 days''' to choose options where no GRJO. (NJC WFAD, '''s.6.1.2''') [[/www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/workforce-adjustment-federal-employees.html|[canada.ca]]]
  −
  −
----
  −
   
== Additional compliance highlights managers should document ==
 
== Additional compliance highlights managers should document ==
   Line 118: Line 107:     
----
 
----
  −
=== Want this as a manager‑ready tool? ===
  −
I can deliver this chart as a '''Word''' or '''Excel''' template with fill‑in fields for: affected part(s), SoMC, assessment
   
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
!Stage
 
!Stage