Difference between revisions of "Treasury Board Directive on Automated Decision Making"
m |
m |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Peer review – to support departments commissioning a review and individuals undertaking the review | * Peer review – to support departments commissioning a review and individuals undertaking the review | ||
* Section 4.5 of the [https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/guideline-service-digital.html#ToC4_5 Guideline on Service and Digital] provides additional guidance on the responsible and ethical use of automated decision systems | * Section 4.5 of the [https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/guideline-service-digital.html#ToC4_5 Guideline on Service and Digital] provides additional guidance on the responsible and ethical use of automated decision systems | ||
| + | Upcoming: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Scope – to support departments in understanding the systems and uses that fall under the purview of the directive | ||
| + | * Reporting – to support departments on the requirement of publishing information on the effectiveness and efficiency of a system in meeting program objectives | ||
| + | * Algorithmic Impact Assessment Guide – to support departments in completing the Algorithmic Impact Assessment and improve the consistency and quality of questionnaire responses | ||
== Resources == | == Resources == | ||
Revision as of 09:40, 15 May 2024
La version française est disponible ici
Background
The Directive on Automated Decision-Making (directive) sets requirements for federal institutions to ensure that the use of AI or other automated systems in making or supporting administrative decision-making is compatible with the core principles of administrative law such as transparency, accountability, legality and procedural fairness. The Directive is supported by the Algorithmic Impact Assessment Tool, an online questionnaire which helps departments understand and manage the risks associated with automated decision systems.
The directive came into effect in April 2019 and applies to systems developed or procured after April 2020.
Guidance
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) has developed guidance to support compliance with the directive:
- Peer review – to support departments commissioning a review and individuals undertaking the review
- Section 4.5 of the Guideline on Service and Digital provides additional guidance on the responsible and ethical use of automated decision systems
Upcoming:
- Scope – to support departments in understanding the systems and uses that fall under the purview of the directive
- Reporting – to support departments on the requirement of publishing information on the effectiveness and efficiency of a system in meeting program objectives
- Algorithmic Impact Assessment Guide – to support departments in completing the Algorithmic Impact Assessment and improve the consistency and quality of questionnaire responses
Resources
- Policy on Service and Digital
- Responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI)
- Third Review of the Directive on Automated Decision-Making
- Draft 1.0 of the Directive on Automated Decision-Making (2018)
Enquiries
Please contact the TBS Responsible Data and AI team (ai-ia@tbs-sct.gc.ca) for any questions.
