Difference between revisions of "GC Enterprise Architecture/Board/When to come"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jana.jessome (talk | contribs) |
Jana.jessome (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|-valign="top" | |-valign="top" | ||
− | |width="25%" style="border: 1px solid | + | |width="25%" style="border: 1px solid LightBlue; color: black; background-color: AliceBlue;" | |
1. Conduct a <b>self-assessment</b> of your initiative against the “Criteria” to determine if you should be presenting to the GC EARB. | 1. Conduct a <b>self-assessment</b> of your initiative against the “Criteria” to determine if you should be presenting to the GC EARB. | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
|-valign="top" | |-valign="top" | ||
− | |width="25%" style="border: 1px solid | + | |width="25%" style="border: 1px solid LightBlue; color: black; background-color: AliceBlue;" | |
2. Ensure that all proposals submitted for review to GC EARB have first been assessed by your <b>DARB</b> (Departmental Architecture Review Board) where one has been established. | 2. Ensure that all proposals submitted for review to GC EARB have first been assessed by your <b>DARB</b> (Departmental Architecture Review Board) where one has been established. | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
|-valign="top" | |-valign="top" | ||
− | |width="25%" style="border: 1px solid | + | |width="25%" style="border: 1px solid LightBlue; color: black; background-color: AliceBlue;" | |
3. Ensure your departmental initiatives are assessed against and <b>align</b> to the requirements set out as the GC Architectural Standards. | 3. Ensure your departmental initiatives are assessed against and <b>align</b> to the requirements set out as the GC Architectural Standards. |
Revision as of 13:53, 17 December 2018
Home | What is EARB | When to come to EARB | EARB Process | Forward Agenda | Past Sessions | Record of Decisions |
What do I do first?
1. Conduct a self-assessment of your initiative against the “Criteria” to determine if you should be presenting to the GC EARB. IF so, complete the GC EARB Template |
2. Ensure that all proposals submitted for review to GC EARB have first been assessed by your DARB (Departmental Architecture Review Board) where one has been established. |
3. Ensure your departmental initiatives are assessed against and align to the requirements set out as the GC Architectural Standards. |
How do you go about getting on the agenda?
Departmental Input
- Go to GC Pedia to attain the most recent GC EARB “Presenter Template”
- Complete the deck
- Email the deck to the generic mailbox: ZZCIOBDP@tbs-sct.gc.ca
TBS - OCIO (EA Review)
- GC EARB team receives alert of a new submission.
- A tentative date for the presentation is identified.
- A GC EA team conducts a review the input material.
- Comments are provided back to the department for clarification.
- A call/meeting occurs to discuss feedback and refine understanding.
- Updated presentation materials may be requested.
- The EARB meeting date is confirmed.
Prepare Assessment
- An architectural assessment is prepared by the GC EA team.
- Alignment against both the GC Digital and GC Architectural Standards is performed.
- This feedback is provided to the department as well as used to brief the Co-chairs of the GC EARB prior to the meeting.
How it works... what to expect
TBS-OCIO Secretariat
2 weeks ahead:
- The Secretariat will extend the calendar invitations to the presenters (typically 1-2 people)
1 week ahead:
- They will request the presentation materials (both French and English) 1 week prior to the session
- They prepare information packages for the EARB membership to review ahead of the meeting.
GC EARB Meeting
- Time to present (being clear to the Board why you are here…. To seek endorsement to xxx )
- A Record of Discussion (RoD) is prepared after the meeting to capture any highlights that the Board noted, as well as the decision of the Board with any conditions.
- NOTE: The RoD may take several weeks to be officially published, but will be available on the GC EARB GC Pedia site.
Follow UP
- There are times when departments must return to the GC EARB as a result of where the project is in it cycle, or from conditions identified by the Board.
- The GC EA team will capture the need for a future visit and proactively schedule it on the GC EARB Forward Agenda.
Useful Links
- Directive on the Management of Information Technology
- Policy on Management of Information Technology
- [EARB Presenter Template]
- [GC Digital Standards]
- [GC Architectural Standards]
- [Application Programming Standards]