Difference between revisions of "Talk:Business Architecture/Past Sessions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* What is the right balance between EA “development” and EA as an internal consultancy service? In a general sense and specifically to each of the EA OM patterns | * What is the right balance between EA “development” and EA as an internal consultancy service? In a general sense and specifically to each of the EA OM patterns | ||
* Should a Minimum Viable BA be defined outside the scope of EA? Within EA? Or both? | * Should a Minimum Viable BA be defined outside the scope of EA? Within EA? Or both? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 10:44, 3 May 2022
2022-04-25: Exploration - Minimal Viable Enterprise and Business Architecture Practice
Quick notes from the discussions
1- Clarifying the purpose and scoping the work:
- Is it worthy to pursue this effort of defining a MVEBA?
- What form should it take? What deliverable(s) / work package(s) should it include?
- How much effort can be put into it? Who’s willing to contribute?
2- Key questions raised during the 2022-04-25 session that should be further discussed:
- How should the EA/EBA practice support Product Management and agile transformation? What does that mean for a MVEBA?
- What is the right balance between EA “development” and EA as an internal consultancy service? In a general sense and specifically to each of the EA OM patterns
- Should a Minimum Viable BA be defined outside the scope of EA? Within EA? Or both?
