Changes

m
no edit summary
Line 344: Line 344:  
<p class="author">by the Law Commission of Ontario</p>
 
<p class="author">by the Law Commission of Ontario</p>
 
<p>This paper identifies a series of important legal and policy issues that Canadian policymakers should consider when contemplating regulatory framework(s) for AI and ADM systems that aid government decision-making.</p>
 
<p>This paper identifies a series of important legal and policy issues that Canadian policymakers should consider when contemplating regulatory framework(s) for AI and ADM systems that aid government decision-making.</p>
 +
<p class="recco">Recommended by the Office of the CIO of Canada, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, a GC Data Community partner</p>
 +
 +
<h3 style="text-decoration:none;">[https://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/data-science/network/automated-systems Responsible use of automated decision systems in the federal government]</h3>
 +
<p class="author">by Benoit Deshaies, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, and Dawn Hall, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat</p>
 +
<p>Data scientists play an important role in assessing data quality and building models to support automated decision systems. An understanding of when the Directive on Automated Decision-Making applies and how to meet its requirements can support the ethical and responsible use of these systems. In particular, the explanation requirement and the guidance (Guidance on Service and Digital, section 4.5.3.) from the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) on model selection are of high relevance to data scientists.</p>
 
<p class="recco">Recommended by the Office of the CIO of Canada, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, a GC Data Community partner</p>
 
<p class="recco">Recommended by the Office of the CIO of Canada, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, a GC Data Community partner</p>
  
2,600

edits