Changes

Discover more about data (view source)

Revision as of 11:09, 8 February 2022

1,396 bytes added , 11:09, 8 February 2022

m

no edit summary

Line 317: Line 317:

<p class="recco">Recommandé par Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada, un partenaire de la Communauté des données du GC.</p>

<br>

+

<h2>Articles and posts</h2>

Line 338: Line 340:

<p>Lessons learned from my data science journey.</p>

<p class="recco">Recommended by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, a GC Data Community partner</p>

+

<h3 style="text-decoration:none;">[https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.10154 Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead]</h3>

+

<p class="author">Cynthia Rudin</p>

+

<p>Black box machine learning models are currently being used for high-stakes decision making throughout society, causing problems in healthcare, criminal justice and other domains. Some people hope that creating methods for explaining these black box models will alleviate some of the problems, but trying to explain black box models, rather than creating models that are interpretable in the first place, is likely to perpetuate bad practice and can potentially cause great harm to society. The way forward is to design models that are inherently interpretable. This Perspective clarifies the chasm between explaining black boxes and using inherently interpretable models, outlines several key reasons why explainable black boxes should be avoided in high-stakes decisions, identifies challenges to interpretable machine learning, and provides several example applications where interpretable models could potentially replace black box models in criminal justice, healthcare and computer vision.</p>

+

<p class="recco">Recommended by the Office of the CIO of Canada, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, a GC Data Community partner</p>

<h3 style="text-decoration:none;">[http://opendatatoolkit.worldbank.org/en/index.html Starting an Open Data Initiative]</h3>

Sharon.twiss

2,600

edits