Important: The GCConnex decommission will not affect GCCollab or GCWiki. Thank you and happy collaborating!

Difference between revisions of "Regulators' Capacity Fund"

From wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<div style="background:#6E8B7B;  color:white;  font-family:Arial; padding:5px 5px 5px 5px;margin-top: -7px;"></div>
 
<div style="background:#6E8B7B;  color:white;  font-family:Arial; padding:5px 5px 5px 5px;margin-top: -7px;"></div>
  
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #E8F0ED 0%, #C3D0C9 100%); border-collapse: collapse; border: none; margin: 0px; box-shadow: 0 2px 5px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); table-layout: auto;"
+
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #FFFFFF, #F8F9FA); border-bottom: 2px solid #1F402B; box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); border-collapse: collapse; border-left: none; border-right: none; border-top: none; margin: 0px; table-layout: auto;"
 
|-
 
|-
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 10%;" | [[Centre for Regulatory Innovation|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="Centre for Regulatory Innovation">Home</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 10%;" | [[Centre for Regulatory Innovation|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="Centre for Regulatory Innovation">Home</span>]]
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 17%;" | [[Regulatory Sandboxes|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="Regulatory Sandboxes">Regulatory Sandbox</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 17%;" | [[Regulatory Sandboxes|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="Regulatory Sandboxes">Regulatory Sandbox</span>]]
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 20%;" | [[What is Regulatory Experimentation?|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="What is Regulatory Experimentation?">Regulatory Experimentation</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 20%;" | [[What is Regulatory Experimentation?|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="What is Regulatory Experimentation?">Regulatory Experimentation</span>]]
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 10%;" | [[Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund">REEF</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 10%;" | [[Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund">REEF</span>]]
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 10%;" | [[Regulators' Capacity Fund|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="Regulators' Capacity Fund">RCF</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 10%;" | [[Regulators' Capacity Fund|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid #1F402B;" title="Regulators' Capacity Fund">RCF</span>]]
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 13%;" | [[CRI Supported Projects|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="CRI Supported Projects">Projects</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 13%;" | [[CRI Supported Projects|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="CRI Supported Projects">Projects</span>]]
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 10%;" |<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="Regulatory Technology Forum">[https://gcxgce.sharepoint.com/teams/10002311/SitePages/Home.aspx RegTech Forum]</span>
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 10%;" |<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="Regulatory Technology Forum">[https://gcxgce.sharepoint.com/teams/10002311/SitePages/Home.aspx RegTech Forum]</span>
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 10%;" |[[CRI Tools and Resources|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="CRI Tools and Resources">Tools</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 10%;" |[[CRI Tools and Resources|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="CRI Tools and Resources">Tools</span>]]
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 
<div style="background: #008080; color:white; font-family:Arial; padding:10px; margin-bottom:20px; border-radius:5px;">
 
<div style="background: #008080; color:white; font-family:Arial; padding:10px; margin-bottom:20px; border-radius:5px;">
 
[[Image:Deadline.png |30px|left|Deadline]] <span style="font-size: 12pt; font-weight:bold;">The RCF funding envelope that was available until March 2025 has been exhausted in the previous call-out (summer 2023). Thank you for your interest</span>
 
[[Image:Deadline.png |30px|left|Deadline]] <span style="font-size: 12pt; font-weight:bold;">The RCF funding envelope that was available until March 2025 has been exhausted in the previous call-out (summer 2023). Thank you for your interest</span>
 
</div>
 
</div>
=== Overview===
 
The Regulators’ Capacity Fund (RCF) responds to calls from Canada’s business community, which has been vocal in its desire for regulators to give increased weight to economic and competitiveness considerations in the development and enforcement of regulations. From 2020-2025, the RCF supported 37 projects with over $14.2 million in funding.  
 
 
To help regulators improve their capacity to incorporate economic, competitiveness, and resilience considerations in the design and implementation of regulations, the aims of the renewed Regulators’ Capacity Fund are to:
 
 
*enhance the capacity of regulators to accurately assess economic impacts of regulatory proposals, including impacts on competitiveness at sector and aggregate levels;
 
 
*enhance the capacity of regulators to design and administer regulations in a manner that accounts for economic and competitiveness impacts, within the context of their overall objectives; and,  
 
*enhance the capacity of regulators to incorporate learnings from the ongoing pandemic response and adapt to rapidly-evolving regulatory landscapes to facilitate a system that is better equipped to mitigate future risks and respond to unanticipated developments, especially those related to climate change and public health.  
 
 
The RCF supports departments and agencies in undertaking projects or initiatives, ranging in scope, that contribute to the enhancement of regulatory capacity. This involves supporting initiatives that would help regulators carry out their functions in a way that is conducive to economic growth. These initiatives would ultimately contribute to enhanced regulatory competitiveness in or beyond their respective sectors.
 
 
The Regulators’ Capacity Fund is overseen by the Centre for Regulatory Innovation, within the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat’s Regulatory Affairs Sector. As part of the Government’s broader regulatory modernization agenda, the Centre promotes a federal regulatory framework that supports innovation and competitiveness.
 
 
=== Key Documents  ===
 
  
*[https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.gccollab.ca%2Fimages%2Fe%2Fe1%2FCRI_Capacity_Fund_-_Project_Progress_Report_Template_-_EN.docx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK RCF Progress Report Template]
+
==<span style="color: #1F402B; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Overview</span>==
*[https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.gccollab.ca%2Fimages%2Fb%2Fbf%2FCRI_Capacity_Fund_-_Project_Final_Report_Template_-_EN.docx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK RCF Final Report Template]
+
The Regulators’ Capacity Fund (RCF) responded to calls from Canada’s business community, which was vocal in its desire for regulators to give increased weight to economic and competitiveness considerations in the development and enforcement of regulations. From 2020-2025, the RCF supported 37 projects with over $14.2 million in funding. To help regulators improve their capacity to incorporate economic, competitiveness, and resilience considerations in the design and implementation of regulations, the aims of the renewed Regulators’ Capacity Fund were to enhance the capacity of regulators to accurately assess economic impacts of regulatory proposals; design and administer regulations in a manner that accounted for economic and competitiveness impacts; and incorporate learnings from the ongoing pandemic response and adapt to rapidly-evolving regulatory landscapes.
*[[:en:images/1/12/RCF_Lessons_Learned_Report_2022_-_English_(Final).pdf|RCF Lessons Learned Report]]
 
  
===Contact us ===
+
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; border:none; border-spacing: 0 15px; border-collapse: separate;"
For general fund related enquiries, including any assistance required to complete the application process, please contact the [Mailto:cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca?Subject=Regulators’%20Capacity%20Fund%20Enquiry&body=%20 Centre for Regulatory Innovation]
 
 
 
===Current Projects===
 
 
[[:en:CRI_Supported_Projects|(Click here to see a list of completed RCF projects and the associated case studies)]]
 
 
 
The following are projects that were supported by the RCF.
 
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width: 100%;"
 
! style="background-color: #C3D0C9; color: #333333; width: 20%;" | Department/Agency
 
! style="background-color: #C3D0C9; color: #333333; width: 25%;" | Project Title
 
! style="background-color: #C3D0C9; color: #333333; width: 55%;" | Project Description
 
 
|-
 
|-
|- bgcolor="#C8D0C1"
+
| style="background-color:#FFFFFF; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; padding: 20px; box-shadow: 0 2px 5px rgba(0,0,0,0.05);" |
|Agriculture  and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC)
+
{| style="width:100%; border: none;"
|A plan to address Canada-specific data gaps on residue left over from drone-based pesticide  application
 
|AAFC will lead a study to  compare pesticide residue levels on crops applied using drones to traditional  equipment that are approved for pesticide application. The results of the  study will help determine the regulatory equivalency of drone-based  applications to ground based and airplane-based applications to inform future  regulatory decision-making.
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)
+
| style="width:220px; vertical-align:top; border: none;" | [[File:Icon Lessons Learned EN.png|212x212px]]
|Improving and Streamlining Electronic reporting  of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) (ECCC and Provincial Partners)
+
| style="vertical-align:top; padding-left:15px; border: none;" |
|The  Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment agreed to work to minimize  duplication and reduce the reporting burden for industry and governments.  ECCC, with six other provinces, designed three interconnected reporting  applications to collect this information in 2011. ECCC is aiming to reduce  reporting burden on industries and enhance user experience by consolidating  the three GHG reporting applications into one, implementing a user-centric  design, features and up-to-date technology.
+
<div style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold; color: #1F402B; margin-bottom: 10px;">Regulators' Capacity Fund: Lessons Learned Report</div>
|- bgcolor="#C8D0C1"
+
This report documents the lessons learned by twenty-six Government of Canada initiatives that were supported under the Regulators’ Capacity Fund between 2019 and 2022, administered by the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat’s Centre for Regulatory Innovation (CRI).
|Health Canada (HC)
+
 
|Access Consortium - Multinational Real-time  collaboration for Health Regulators
+
[[:en:images/1/12/RCF_Lessons_Learned_Report_2022_-_English_(Final).pdf|→ Access the report]]
|As  part of the Access Consortium Project, 5 countries - Australia, Canada,  Singapore, Switzerland and United Kingdom review drug applications  independently, and share files to collaborate. As regulators are repeating  others’ work and due to differences in cloud policies of every country, this  is done in a nonsynchronous way at this time. HC is aiming to further develop  a proof-of-concept prototype that will allow all five international partners  to collaborate and share information in a secure manner real-time.
+
|}
 
|-
 
|-
|Health Canada (HC)
+
| style="background-color:#FFFFFF; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; padding: 20px; box-shadow: 0 2px 5px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
|Food and Drug Industry Data Tools
+
<div style="font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold; color: #1F402B; margin-bottom: 10px;">Completed RCF Projects</div>
|Health  Canada is aiming to facilitate the preparation of additionally robust and  defensible cost-benefit analysis. The project seeks to maximize its insights  into material impacts on subsectors of HC’s industrial stakeholders by fully  leveraging StatsCan’s Business Registry and developing a data collection tool  (survey) to fill gaps in information that are identified as still outstanding.
+
The RCF supported 37 projects from 2020-2025. Explore the completed projects and associated case studies to learn more about their outcomes and the lessons learned.
|- bgcolor="#C8D0C1"
+
<div style="margin-top: 15px;">
|Health Canada (HC)
+
<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-progressive" style="font-size: 1em; padding: 8px 12px;">[[CRI Supported Projects|View All Completed Projects]]</span>
|Willingness to Pay framework
+
</div>
|HC proposes  to develop a framework by which to obtain the costs of collection of  Canadian’s willingness to pay for the benefits of regulations to obtain  additional valuable data for cost-benefit analysis. In preparing complex  regulations it is often easier to collect and monetize the costs to regulated  parties than the benefits to the public.
 
|-
 
|Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC)
 
|Capacity building for the Impact Assessment  Agency of Canada through practical experience in identifying the costs and  benefits of regulations, including the Cost Recovery Regulations
 
|IAAC  proposes to utilize an experienced senior analyst to conduct an effective cost  benefit analysis as part of the development of Cost Recovery Regulations. The  resource would involve and train ~ three IAAC staff from the Legislative and  Regulatory Affairs Division while the CBA is being conducted. This will allow  agency staff to learn how to conduct CBAs for future regulatory initiatives  as well as those currently underway.
 
|- bgcolor="#C8D0C1"
 
|Natural Resources Canada (NRCan)
 
|Streamlining the economic  analysis requirements of the Canadian impact assessment process
 
|NRCan and the Impact  Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) propose to lead an interdepartmental  working group to develop guidance for project proponents regarding  requirements and coordinate Government of Canada (GoC) review of the economic  analysis under the Impact Assessment Act (IAA) and Information and Management  of Time Limits Regulations.
 
|-
 
|Natural Resources Canada (NRCan)
 
|Mining activity tool to  help permits for mining projects
 
|NRCan proposes to  investigate the use of Rules as Code (RaC) to develop guidance material to  help the mining industry navigate the permitting process. This guidance  material needs to be developed in an automated way, be always up to date,  consistent, accurate, and maintained with minimal effort.
 
|- bgcolor="#C8D0C1"
 
|Transport Canada (TC)
 
|Expanding operational  capabilities of Canadian air operators in winter weather conditions
 
|This project proposed by TC  aims to identify and leverage best practices from other jurisdictions such as  the US and Europe to improve aviation requirements where the operational  capabilities of Canadian air operators could be safely expanded in winter  conditions to increase international alignment and competitiveness. This  includes improving TC’s regulatory guidance through an informed and data-driven  policy.
 
|-
 
|<span class="normaltextrun"><span lang="EN-CA"></span></span>Transport Canada (TC)
 
|Building a Canadian Framework for Vehicle Cyber  Security Requirements to Support Alignment with International Regulations
 
|TC is aiming to  develop a vehicle cyber security certification framework to support industry  in demonstrating compliance with vehicle technical requirements that is  aligned internationally. Compared to Europe and Asia, the US and Canada have  a self-certification model and deeply integrated of supply chains. As TC does  not have dedicated vehicle cyber security authorities, a framework will help  with future regulatory decision-making process.
 
|- bgcolor="#C8D0C1"
 
|Transport Canada (TC)
 
|Road Safety and Vehicle Regulations
 
|TC is proposing a  pilot study to demonstrate and validate a new approach using virtual test  platforms required for motor vehicle safety oversight. As Automated Driving  Systems vehicles are evolving from traditional mechanical systems to software  centric platforms, novel approaches to safety oversight are required. Starting  with the digitalization of real-world driving environments, computer  simulation test tools for automated vehicles will be examined to verify the  accuracy of manufacturer’s test results for regulatory decision-making  purposes.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
'''Questions?'''
  
 +
If you have any questions, please contact the CRI at: [mailto:&#x20;cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca]
  
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__

Latest revision as of 11:19, 7 October 2025

Home Regulatory Sandbox Regulatory Experimentation REEF RCF Projects RegTech Forum Tools
Deadline
The RCF funding envelope that was available until March 2025 has been exhausted in the previous call-out (summer 2023). Thank you for your interest

Overview

The Regulators’ Capacity Fund (RCF) responded to calls from Canada’s business community, which was vocal in its desire for regulators to give increased weight to economic and competitiveness considerations in the development and enforcement of regulations. From 2020-2025, the RCF supported 37 projects with over $14.2 million in funding. To help regulators improve their capacity to incorporate economic, competitiveness, and resilience considerations in the design and implementation of regulations, the aims of the renewed Regulators’ Capacity Fund were to enhance the capacity of regulators to accurately assess economic impacts of regulatory proposals; design and administer regulations in a manner that accounted for economic and competitiveness impacts; and incorporate learnings from the ongoing pandemic response and adapt to rapidly-evolving regulatory landscapes.

Icon Lessons Learned EN.png
Regulators' Capacity Fund: Lessons Learned Report

This report documents the lessons learned by twenty-six Government of Canada initiatives that were supported under the Regulators’ Capacity Fund between 2019 and 2022, administered by the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat’s Centre for Regulatory Innovation (CRI).

→ Access the report

Completed RCF Projects

The RCF supported 37 projects from 2020-2025. Explore the completed projects and associated case studies to learn more about their outcomes and the lessons learned.

Questions?

If you have any questions, please contact the CRI at: cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca