Important: The GCConnex decommission will not affect GCCollab or GCWiki. Thank you and happy collaborating!

Difference between revisions of "Regulatory Sandboxes"

From wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[File:Regulatory Sandboxes.png|alt=|frameless|1062x1062px]]
 
[[File:Regulatory Sandboxes.png|alt=|frameless|1062x1062px]]
 
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px); clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</span>}}
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px); clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</span>}}
 
 
[[FR:Les bacs à sable réglementaires]]
 
[[FR:Les bacs à sable réglementaires]]
<div style="background:#6E8B7B;  color:white;  font-family:Arial; padding:5px 5px 5px 5px;margin-top: -10px;"></div>
+
<div style="background:#6E8B7B;  color:white;  font-family:Arial; padding:5px 5px 5px 5px;margin-top: -7px;"></div>
  
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #E8F0ED 0%, #C3D0C9 100%); border-collapse: collapse; border: none; margin: 0; box-shadow: 0 2px 5px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); table-layout: auto;"
+
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #FFFFFF, #F8F9FA); border-bottom: 2px solid #1F402B; box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); border-collapse: collapse; border-left: none; border-right: none; border-top: none; margin: 0px; table-layout: auto;"
 
|-
 
|-
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 10%;" | [[Centre for Regulatory Innovation|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="Centre for Regulatory Innovation">Home</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 10%;" | [[Centre for Regulatory Innovation|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="Centre for Regulatory Innovation">Home</span>]]
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 17%;" | [[Regulatory Sandboxes|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="Regulatory Sandboxes">Regulatory Sandbox</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 17%;" | [[Regulatory Sandboxes|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid #1F402B;" title="Regulatory Sandboxes">Regulatory Sandbox</span>]]
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 20%;" | [[What is Regulatory Experimentation?|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="What is Regulatory Experimentation?">Regulatory Experimentation</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 20%;" | [[What is Regulatory Experimentation?|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="What is Regulatory Experimentation?">Regulatory Experimentation</span>]]
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 10%;" | [[Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund">REEF</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 10%;" | [[Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund">REEF</span>]]
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 10%;" | [[Regulators' Capacity Fund|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="Regulators' Capacity Fund">RCF</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 10%;" | [[Regulators' Capacity Fund|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="Regulators' Capacity Fund">RCF</span>]]
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 13%;" | [[CRI Supported Projects|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="CRI Supported Projects">Projects</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 13%;" | [[CRI Supported Projects|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="CRI Supported Projects">Projects</span>]]
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 12px 5px; width: 10%;" | [[CRI Tools and Resources|<span style="color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold;" title="CRI Tools and Resources">Tools</span>]]
+
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 10%;" |<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="Regulatory Technology Forum">[https://gcxgce.sharepoint.com/teams/10002311/SitePages/Home.aspx RegTech Forum]</span>
 +
| style="text-align: center; border: none; padding: 0; width: 10%;" |[[CRI Tools and Resources|<span style="display: inline-block; color: #1A2329; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; padding: 15px 5px; border-bottom: 3px solid transparent;" title="CRI Tools and Resources">Tools</span>]]
 
|}
 
|}
==='''Regulatory Sandboxes in the Federal Government'''===
 
In [https://budget.canada.ca/2024/report-rapport/chap4-en.html#Cutting_Red_Tape:~:text=Cutting%20Red%20Tape%20to,to%20modern%20business%20realities. Budget 2024], the Government committed to enable broader use of regulatory sandboxes across government, including announcing its intent to introduce amendments to the ''Red Tape Reduction Act'' to provide all Ministers with the authority to issue exemptions for the purpose of enabling regulatory sandboxes.
 
  
To support the Government’s commitment in Budget 2024, the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) is developing a proposed federal framework for regulatory sandboxes, informed by discussions with federal regulators as well as a [https://letstalkfederalregulations.ca/sandboxes public consultation] on the ''Let’s Talk Federal Regulations'' platform ([https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/laws/developing-improving-federal-regulations/regulatory-evaluation-results/what-we-heard-report-consultation-on-the-annual-regulatory-modernization-bill.html What We Heard Report]).
+
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; border:none; border-spacing: 0 15px; border-collapse: separate;"
 +
|-
 +
| style="background-color:#FFFFFF; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; padding: 25px; box-shadow: 0 2px 5px rgba(0,0,0,0.05);" |
 +
<div style="font-size: 16pt; font-weight: bold; color: #1F402B; margin-bottom: 15px;">What is a Regulatory Sandbox?</div>
 +
A regulatory sandbox is a tool that allows regulators to learn how to best regulate innovation before making permanent regulatory changes. It enables temporary, limited authorizations of new products, services, or processes while under direct regulatory supervision. Evidence gathered helps regulators decide how an innovation should be managed long-term.
 +
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; border:none; text-align:center; margin-top: 20px;"
 +
|-
 +
| style="width:33%; vertical-align:top; padding:10px; border-right: 1px solid #eeeeee;" |
 +
<div style="font-size:1.2em; font-weight:bold; margin:10px 0;">Learn & Gather Evidence</div>
 +
Sandboxes allow regulators to evaluate how a new technology or approach works in a controlled environment, providing valuable insights and data to inform permanent, evidence-based regulatory decisions.
 +
| style="width:33%; vertical-align:top; padding:10px; border-right: 1px solid #eeeeee;" |
 +
<div style="font-size:1.2em; font-weight:bold; margin:10px 0;">Supervise & Protect</div>
 +
Regulators actively monitor the sandbox, establishing conditions to ensure that consumer protections are upheld. This direct oversight allows for a safe testing environment for promising innovations.
 +
| style="width:33%; vertical-align:top; padding:10px;" |
 +
<div style="font-size:1.2em; font-weight:bold; margin:10px 0;">Adapt & Respond</div>
 +
If unexpected risks emerge or the situation changes, regulators have the flexibility to adjust the conditions or terminate the sandbox. This adaptability ensures that safety and public interest remain the top priorities.
 +
|}
 +
<div style="background-color: #F0F4F8; padding: 20px; border-left: 5px solid #6E8B7B; margin: 25px 0 0 0;">
 +
<div style="font-size:1.2em; font-weight:bold; margin-bottom:5px;">Government Commitment</div>
 +
In [https://budget.canada.ca/2024/report-rapport/chap4-en.html#Cutting_Red_Tape Budget 2024], the Government of Canada committed to enabling broader use of regulatory sandboxes. To support this, TBS is developing a federal framework informed by discussions with regulators and a [https://letstalkfederalregulations.ca/sandboxes public consultation].
 +
</div>
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
<div style="font-size: 16pt; font-weight: bold; color: #1F402B; margin-bottom: 15px;">Examples of Federal Regulatory Sandboxes</div>
 +
|-
 +
| style="background-color:#FFFFFF; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; padding: 25px; box-shadow: 0 2px 5px rgba(0,0,0,0.05);" |
 +
<div style="font-size: 1.2em; font-weight: bold; color: #1F402B; margin-bottom: 10px;">Transport Canada: Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (Drones)</div>
 +
'''The Challenge:''' Existing regulations did not fully cover beyond visual line-of-sight (BVLOS) drone operations, which are crucial for improving efficiency, accessing remote areas, and enhancing safety.
  
==='''What are Regulatory Sandboxes?'''===
+
'''Sandbox Action:''' Transport Canada used its authority to issue exemptions and special licenses for testing currently prohibited BVLOS operations. This allowed them to test drone activities under strict government supervision.
  
A regulatory sandbox is a tool that allows regulators to learn how to incorporate or best regulate innovation before making permanent regulatory changes. It allows for temporary limited authorizations of innovation and demonstrates how regulatory regimes could be modernized, while under regulatory supervision. Evidence gathered can help a regulator decide whether to make any permanent changes, including how an innovative product, service, process, regulatory approaches, or non-regulatory approach should be managed.  
+
<div style="background-color: #E6F4EA; border-left: 4px solid #4CAF50; margin-top: 15px; padding: 10px 15px;">
<div style="background-color: #F5F5F5; padding: 10px; border-left: 5px solid #4A4A4A; margin: 5px 0;">
+
'''Outcome:''' Evidence gathered from the sandbox supported amendments to the ''Canadian Aviation Regulations''. New rules for lower-risk BVLOS operations will come into force in 2025.
For example, regulators may want to understand how a regulatory approach would work for a new technology that is not currently permitted under existing regulation. In these cases, regulators could enable regulatory sandboxes by issuing temporary authorization from specific legislative or regulatory requirements. This allows them to evaluate how the new technology could be regulated in a modern or innovative way.  
+
</div>
 +
|-
 +
| style="background-color:#FFFFFF; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; padding: 25px; box-shadow: 0 2px 5px rgba(0,0,0,0.05);" |
 +
<div style="font-size: 1.2em; font-weight: bold; color: #1F402B; margin-bottom: 10px;">Transport Canada: Electronic Shipping Documents</div>
 +
'''The Challenge:''' Regulations required a physical paper shipping document for most dangerous goods, an outdated process that created administrative burden.
  
Regulators can actively monitor the implementation of the new technology and establish conditions to ensure that consumer protections are upheld throughout the process. If any unexpected risks emerge or the situation changes, regulators have the flexibility to adjust the conditions or terminate the regulatory sandbox, as needed.
+
'''Sandbox Action:''' A two-year sandbox was initiated to test the use of electronic shipping documents, collaborating with industry to pilot various digital platforms that met high security and accessibility standards.
  
The evidence gathered from the regulatory sandbox can provide valuable insights. This data helps regulators make informed decisions about permanently allowing the technology, ensuring that it is safely and effectively integrated into the market. By learning from these regulatory sandboxes, regulators can determine how they should design and manage regulations and create modernized frameworks that are more effective and well-suited to innovation.
+
<div style="background-color: #E6F4EA; border-left: 4px solid #4CAF50; margin-top: 15px; padding: 10px 15px;">
 +
'''Outcome:''' The sandbox was successful, saving 21 million sheets of paper and enhancing safety for first responders. The ''Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations'' have been modernized to allow electronic documents for rail and drone transport.
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
|-
 +
| style="background-color:#FFFFFF; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; padding: 25px; box-shadow: 0 2px 5px rgba(0,0,0,0.05);" |
 +
<div style="font-size: 1.2em; font-weight: bold; color: #1F402B; margin-bottom: 10px;">Transport Canada: Light Sport Aircraft (LSA)</div>
 +
'''The Challenge:''' Flight Training Units (FTUs) could not use cost-effective and fuel-efficient Light Sport Aircraft because LSAs lacked the required Certificate of Airworthiness.
  
==='''Examples of Regulatory Sandboxes'''===
+
'''Sandbox Action:''' Supported by the CRI's REEF, Transport Canada issued regulatory exemptions to allow FTUs to use LSAs for flight training, assessing their reliability, performance, emissions, and noise levels.
Below are examples of regulatory sandboxes that federal regulators have undertaken.  
 
  
Only a few federal departments and agencies currently have the authority to run regulatory sandboxes and fewer have yet launched any. Under the proposed federal framework for regulatory sandboxes, all ministers will have the opportunity to implement them.  
+
<div style="background-color: #EBF5FB; border-left: 4px solid #3498DB; margin-top: 15px; padding: 10px 15px;">
 
+
'''Status:''' This sandbox is ongoing. The learnings will be used to inform the development of a permanent regulatory framework to support the safe use of these innovative aircraft in training environments.
(Project titles are hyperlinked with additional information if available)
+
</div>
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width: 100%;"
 
! style="background-color: #C3D0C9; color: #333333; width: 20%;" |Department/Agency
 
! style="background-color: #C3D0C9; color: #333333; width: 25%;" | Regulatory Sandbox Title
 
! style="background-color: #C3D0C9; color: #333333; width: 55%;" |Regulatory Sandbox Description
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Transport Canada
+
| style="background-color:#F8F9FA; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; padding: 25px; box-shadow: 0 2px 5px rgba(0,0,0,0.05);" |
|[https://tc.canada.ca/en/aviation/publications/aviation-safety-letter/issue-4-2020/remotely-piloted-aircraft-systems-rpas-otherwise-known-drones Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems] (2019 – ongoing)
+
<div style="font-size: 16pt; font-weight: bold; color: #1F402B; margin-bottom: 15px;">Get Involved & Contact Us</div>
| Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems, or drones, have become increasingly popular over the last several years. To address the safety risks associated with the growing number of drone operations, Transport Canada introduced Part IX of the ''Canadian Aviation Regulations'' (CARs) in January 2019. These rules outline the regulations for drone flights in Canada. However, the regulation did not fully cover beyond visual line-of-sight (BVLOS) operations and other innovative drone uses, which are crucial for extending operational range, improving efficiency, accessing remote areas, reducing costs, and enhancing safety.
+
The Government of Canada is seeking input on the development of its regulatory sandbox framework. You can share your thoughts on the [https://letstalkfederalregulations.ca/sandboxes Let’s Talk Federal Regulations] platform.
Transport Canada has used their authority under the ''[https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/A-2.pdf Aeronautics Act]'' to issue [https://tc.canada.ca/en/aviation/reference-centre/exemptions-canadian-aviation-regulations-cars/exemption-sections-60241-60366-paragraphs-90164c-90183c-canadian-aviation-regulations exemptions] and special licences for testing currently prohibited or unregulated drone activities under government supervision. This includes BVLOS operations in sparsely populated areas, below 400 feet, using visual observer detect and avoid (DAA) functions, and, in some cases, testing technological solutions for DAA.
 
  
The evidence gathered from this regulatory sandbox has supported Transport Canada’s decision to make [https://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2023/2023-06-24/html/reg6-eng.html amendments] to the ''[https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/SOR-96-433.pdf Canadian Aviation Regulations]'' regarding drone use in Canada. These changes, specifically for lower-risk BVLOS operations, will come into force on April 1, 2025.
+
If you have any questions, please contact the CRI at: '''[mailto:cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca]'''
|- bgcolor="#f2f2f2"
+
|}
|Transport Canada
 
|[https://tc.canada.ca/en/dangerous-goods/electronic-shipping-documents/study-use-electronic-shipping-documents-transport-dangerous-goods Electronic Shipping Documents] (2020-2022)
 
|The ''Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations'' previously required a physical paper shipping document to accompany most dangerous goods while in transport. To modernize this process, Transport Canada initiated a two-year regulatory sandbox to explore using electronic shipping documents instead of paper ones.
 
The primary goal was to determine if using electronic shipping documents could be as safe or safer than traditional paper documents. By reducing paperwork, the initiative aimed to modernize the regulations and streamline the transportation process. Throughout the regulatory sandbox, Transport Canada collaborated with industry stakeholders to pilot various digital platforms, ensuring they met stringent security and accessibility standards.
 
  
Based on the findings, Transport Canada has modernized parts of the ''Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations'' to reduce the administrative burden and allow the use of electronic shipping documents for transport by rail and by remotely piloted aircraft systems.
+
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
 
One of the key benefits of this initiative was the enhanced ability of first responders to access crucial information remotely, helping them avoid potential hazards. The speed and accuracy of information sharing were significantly improved, leading to more efficient and safer transportation processes. Additionally, the adoption of electronic shipping documents resulted in substantial environmental benefits, with participants saving 21 million sheets of paper, significantly reducing paper and ink usage.  
 
|-
 
|Transport Canada
 
|Light Sport Aircraft (LSA) (2021-2025)
 
|Per ''[https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/SOR-96-433.pdf Canadian Aviation Regulations]'', Flight Training Units (FTUs) must have a Certificate of Airworthiness for their aircraft. Despite the potential benefits of using Light Sports Aircraft (LSA) for flight training, LSAs do not have such certification, making them unusable by FTUs. Incorporating LSAs could reduce costs for Canadian businesses, integrate new technologies into current practices, lower emissions and pollution with more fuel-efficient training aircraft, and enhance Canada's international competitiveness.
 
To explore this need, Transport Canada, supported by funding from the [[:en:Regulatory_Experimentation_Expense_Fund|CRI’s Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund]], enabled a regulatory sandbox to determine if LSAs can safely be used for flight training under an alternative regulatory approach. The goal of the regulatory sandbox is to assess the reliability and suitability of LSAs in training environments, focusing on their performance, emissions, and noise level. Transport Canada issued regulatory exemptions (CTA-001-2024) allowing LSAs to be used without the required Certificate of Airworthiness. The learnings from the regulatory sandbox will be used to inform the development of an appropriate regulatory framework to support the safe use of these innovative aircrafts.
 
|}
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
 
'''Questions?'''
 
 
If you have any questions, please contact the CRI at: [Mailto:cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca].
 

Latest revision as of 16:54, 3 October 2025

Home Regulatory Sandbox Regulatory Experimentation REEF RCF Projects RegTech Forum Tools
What is a Regulatory Sandbox?

A regulatory sandbox is a tool that allows regulators to learn how to best regulate innovation before making permanent regulatory changes. It enables temporary, limited authorizations of new products, services, or processes while under direct regulatory supervision. Evidence gathered helps regulators decide how an innovation should be managed long-term.

Learn & Gather Evidence

Sandboxes allow regulators to evaluate how a new technology or approach works in a controlled environment, providing valuable insights and data to inform permanent, evidence-based regulatory decisions.

Supervise & Protect

Regulators actively monitor the sandbox, establishing conditions to ensure that consumer protections are upheld. This direct oversight allows for a safe testing environment for promising innovations.

Adapt & Respond

If unexpected risks emerge or the situation changes, regulators have the flexibility to adjust the conditions or terminate the sandbox. This adaptability ensures that safety and public interest remain the top priorities.

Government Commitment

In Budget 2024, the Government of Canada committed to enabling broader use of regulatory sandboxes. To support this, TBS is developing a federal framework informed by discussions with regulators and a public consultation.

Examples of Federal Regulatory Sandboxes
Transport Canada: Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (Drones)

The Challenge: Existing regulations did not fully cover beyond visual line-of-sight (BVLOS) drone operations, which are crucial for improving efficiency, accessing remote areas, and enhancing safety.

Sandbox Action: Transport Canada used its authority to issue exemptions and special licenses for testing currently prohibited BVLOS operations. This allowed them to test drone activities under strict government supervision.

Outcome: Evidence gathered from the sandbox supported amendments to the Canadian Aviation Regulations. New rules for lower-risk BVLOS operations will come into force in 2025.

Transport Canada: Electronic Shipping Documents

The Challenge: Regulations required a physical paper shipping document for most dangerous goods, an outdated process that created administrative burden.

Sandbox Action: A two-year sandbox was initiated to test the use of electronic shipping documents, collaborating with industry to pilot various digital platforms that met high security and accessibility standards.

Outcome: The sandbox was successful, saving 21 million sheets of paper and enhancing safety for first responders. The Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations have been modernized to allow electronic documents for rail and drone transport.

Transport Canada: Light Sport Aircraft (LSA)

The Challenge: Flight Training Units (FTUs) could not use cost-effective and fuel-efficient Light Sport Aircraft because LSAs lacked the required Certificate of Airworthiness.

Sandbox Action: Supported by the CRI's REEF, Transport Canada issued regulatory exemptions to allow FTUs to use LSAs for flight training, assessing their reliability, performance, emissions, and noise levels.

Status: This sandbox is ongoing. The learnings will be used to inform the development of a permanent regulatory framework to support the safe use of these innovative aircraft in training environments.

Get Involved & Contact Us

The Government of Canada is seeking input on the development of its regulatory sandbox framework. You can share your thoughts on the Let’s Talk Federal Regulations platform.

If you have any questions, please contact the CRI at: cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca