Difference between revisions of "March 20, 2024 - Updates, priorities of the week"
Rob.boudreau (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Back to GC Web Priorities Meetings - Réunions des Priorités Web du GC ==Meeting information== ===Agenda=== 1. Updates 2. Roundtable ==Notes and action items== ===Roundt...") |
Rob.boudreau (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
2. Roundtable | 2. Roundtable | ||
==Notes and action items== | ==Notes and action items== | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Updates === | ||
+ | '''PCO''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * We’re getting questions about budget, no info yet, will share when we know | ||
+ | * Budget is April 17 | ||
+ | * Adobe Analytics monthly meeting this morning, check the [https://www.gcpedia.gc.ca/wiki/Adobe_Analytics_Change_Management_Meetings GCPEDIA] page if you’re interested in joining up for next month | ||
+ | |||
===Roundtable=== | ===Roundtable=== | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | ||
+ | CRA | ||
+ | |||
+ | * If you have migrated your Intranet to Sharepoint, please contact [[Mailto:gabriel.portillo@cra-arc.gc.ca|gabriel.portillo@cra-arc.gc.ca]] | ||
+ | * Also looking for anyone who can share training experience for Drupal | ||
+ | |||
+ | Public Safety | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Wildfires emergencies - planning for the upcoming wildfires season is underway now at senior levels, coordination on the web presence ([[/www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/campaigns/wildfires.html|https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/campaigns/wildfires.html]]) should be through your colleagues who attend the Federal Emergency Communications Coordination calls for content updates and linking | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Get Prepared - We anticipate publishing updated content from the first set of 10 hazards that were developed with partner departments in the coming weeks in advance of EP Week (May 5th) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Health Canada - Recalls and Safety Alerts - Updated UX test | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Presentation | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Website about recalls and safety alerts | ||
+ | * Goals and objectives, to determine if changes made were helping users | ||
+ | * Users had to complete 14 tasks | ||
+ | * Old study: Moderated | ||
+ | ** All tasks were in random order | ||
+ | * New study: | ||
+ | ** Unmoderated | ||
+ | * We used UserZoom | ||
+ | * Findings: | ||
+ | ** We scored users scored from 1-5 | ||
+ | ** Found this system better than pass/fail | ||
+ | * Task performance Old vs. New | ||
+ | ** User success increased roughly by 22% | ||
+ | ** Users got frustrated with task 7, they said it was not user friendly | ||
+ | ** Comparing task 7 and 14, the Transport Canada system, users preferred the TC search system | ||
+ | ** Task 1, find if there’s issues with Primidone drug, there seems to be a problem with metadata so that GOC results appeared low on the page | ||
+ | ** Users saw filters as an obstacle rather than a tool | ||
+ | * Filtering issues | ||
+ | ** We are asking users to filter based on categories they didn’t know | ||
+ | ** Additionally, on mobile, users had to scroll through several screens to navigate through all the filters | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Search issues: | ||
+ | ** The search was collecting too many results based on irrelevant search terms | ||
+ | ** Users are more willing to wait when they see a loading animation | ||
+ | ** If nothing is happening, they don’t know if the search has stopped working | ||
+ | ** Users didn’t know when to stop searching | ||
+ | ** Action items were at the bottom of the page | ||
+ | * Mobile design issues: | ||
+ | ** We had to make sure that users on mobile didn’t have to scroll horizontally | ||
+ | ** Have to take into account how users hold their phones | ||
+ | * Lessons learned: | ||
+ | ** A bad system can make a user lose faith after just one bad experience, they will use a different system like Google | ||
+ | ** We have made a prototype which is available for testing | ||
+ | ** Users don’t know if they’re searching for something that exists or not | ||
+ | *** If the result does show up right away, they will assume there’s no recall | ||
+ | |||
+ | QUESTIONS | ||
+ | |||
+ | Q: The [[/design.canada.ca/common-design-patterns/tables.html|responsive table]] on Canada.ca was designed so that you don’t have to scroll sideways, but it’s stayed in Beta. | ||
+ | |||
+ | A: Transport Canada has a good internal search, but not really accessible from google. The Health Canada data has been accessible in Google. We are based on a Drupal platform and haven’t to date been able to implement the responsive table, but we are working on it right now. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Q: Really great presentation. Two points: It seemed that the alerts looked permanent, but they should be temporary. The health icon was not easily identifiable. | ||
+ | |||
+ | A: Thank you. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Q: How did you like UserZoomGo? | ||
+ | |||
+ | A: Actually the company has been bought out, so stay tuned to hear about other products. | ||
+ | |||
+ | DTO: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * We looked at many products, here’s a review we put together. The pricing with UserZoomGo has definitely gone up after the corporate change. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * This is a good issue for everyone to share their experiences in Slack, because companies change rapidly, so the landscape is constantly evolving rapidly | ||
+ | |||
+ | Comments on research tools: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Participants mentioned it would be helpful to assemble a list of approved tools and the justifications teams used to get approval | ||
+ | * A user mentioned it could be a good idea if Principle Publisher had a license for a research tool similar to Adobe Analytics, for use by the whole community |
Revision as of 14:22, 11 April 2024
Back to GC Web Priorities Meetings - Réunions des Priorités Web du GC
Meeting information
Agenda
1. Updates
2. Roundtable
Notes and action items
Updates
PCO
- We’re getting questions about budget, no info yet, will share when we know
- Budget is April 17
- Adobe Analytics monthly meeting this morning, check the GCPEDIA page if you’re interested in joining up for next month
Roundtable
CRA
- If you have migrated your Intranet to Sharepoint, please contact [[1]]
- Also looking for anyone who can share training experience for Drupal
Public Safety
- Wildfires emergencies - planning for the upcoming wildfires season is underway now at senior levels, coordination on the web presence (https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/campaigns/wildfires.html) should be through your colleagues who attend the Federal Emergency Communications Coordination calls for content updates and linking
- Get Prepared - We anticipate publishing updated content from the first set of 10 hazards that were developed with partner departments in the coming weeks in advance of EP Week (May 5th)
Health Canada - Recalls and Safety Alerts - Updated UX test
- Presentation
- Website about recalls and safety alerts
- Goals and objectives, to determine if changes made were helping users
- Users had to complete 14 tasks
- Old study: Moderated
- All tasks were in random order
- New study:
- Unmoderated
- We used UserZoom
- Findings:
- We scored users scored from 1-5
- Found this system better than pass/fail
- Task performance Old vs. New
- User success increased roughly by 22%
- Users got frustrated with task 7, they said it was not user friendly
- Comparing task 7 and 14, the Transport Canada system, users preferred the TC search system
- Task 1, find if there’s issues with Primidone drug, there seems to be a problem with metadata so that GOC results appeared low on the page
- Users saw filters as an obstacle rather than a tool
- Filtering issues
- We are asking users to filter based on categories they didn’t know
- Additionally, on mobile, users had to scroll through several screens to navigate through all the filters
- Search issues:
- The search was collecting too many results based on irrelevant search terms
- Users are more willing to wait when they see a loading animation
- If nothing is happening, they don’t know if the search has stopped working
- Users didn’t know when to stop searching
- Action items were at the bottom of the page
- Mobile design issues:
- We had to make sure that users on mobile didn’t have to scroll horizontally
- Have to take into account how users hold their phones
- Lessons learned:
- A bad system can make a user lose faith after just one bad experience, they will use a different system like Google
- We have made a prototype which is available for testing
- Users don’t know if they’re searching for something that exists or not
- If the result does show up right away, they will assume there’s no recall
QUESTIONS
Q: The responsive table on Canada.ca was designed so that you don’t have to scroll sideways, but it’s stayed in Beta.
A: Transport Canada has a good internal search, but not really accessible from google. The Health Canada data has been accessible in Google. We are based on a Drupal platform and haven’t to date been able to implement the responsive table, but we are working on it right now.
Q: Really great presentation. Two points: It seemed that the alerts looked permanent, but they should be temporary. The health icon was not easily identifiable.
A: Thank you.
Q: How did you like UserZoomGo?
A: Actually the company has been bought out, so stay tuned to hear about other products.
DTO:
- We looked at many products, here’s a review we put together. The pricing with UserZoomGo has definitely gone up after the corporate change.
- This is a good issue for everyone to share their experiences in Slack, because companies change rapidly, so the landscape is constantly evolving rapidly
Comments on research tools:
- Participants mentioned it would be helpful to assemble a list of approved tools and the justifications teams used to get approval
- A user mentioned it could be a good idea if Principle Publisher had a license for a research tool similar to Adobe Analytics, for use by the whole community