151
edits
Changes
Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund (view source)
Revision as of 16:01, 1 November 2023
, 16:01, 1 November 2023Further edits
='''Interested in applying? Want to learn more?'''=
='''Interested in applying? Want to learn more?'''=
The first step is to contact the [[Mailto:cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca?Subject=Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund Enquiry&body=|Centre for Regulatory Innovation]] to request an informal consultation to determine whether and how the REEF can best support your goals.
The first step is to contact the [mailto:cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca?Subject=Regulatory%20Experimentation%20Expense%20Fund%20Enquiry&body=%20 <u>Centre for Regulatory Innovation</u>] to request an informal consultation to determine whether and how the REEF can best support your goals.
Several different types of projects have been eligible for the REEF – read more [[CRI Supported Projects|here]].
Several different types of projects have been eligible for the REEF – read more [[CRI Supported Projects|here]].
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
!
!
=The REEF Process=
|-
|-
![[File:The REEF Process Graphic.png|alt=Step 1 is an informal consultation Step 2 is writing an expression of interest (aka EOI) Step 3 is a proposal Step 4 is a funding decision Step 5 is a memorandum of understanding (aka MOU) Step 6 project starts Step 7 reporting Step 8 sharing lessons learned At every step is CRI support and oversight|none|thumb|1025x1025px]]
![[File:The REEF Process Graphic.png|alt=Step 1 is an informal consultation Step 2 is writing an expression of interest (aka EOI) Step 3 is a proposal Step 4 is a funding decision Step 5 is a memorandum of understanding (aka MOU) Step 6 project starts Step 7 reporting Step 8 sharing lessons learned At every step is CRI support and oversight|none|thumb|1025x1025px]]
|-
|-
!Step 2: Expression of Interest Submission
!
=== Step 2: Expression of Interest Submission===
The first step is the submission of a high-level Expression of Interest (EOI) that is used by the CRI to determine the eligibility of the project. To be eligible for funding, proposed experiments must clearly demonstrate how their funding request meets the criteria as outlined in the REEF Guide. It is highly recommended that applicants informally confirm the eligibility of their project by scheduling an informal consultation with the CRI before completing an EOI. EOI submissions are due January 16, 2024.
The second step is the submission of a high-level Expression of Interest (EOI) that is used by the CRI to determine the eligibility of the project. To be eligible for funding, proposed experiments must clearly demonstrate how their funding request meets the criteria as outlined in the REEF Guide. It is highly recommended that applicants informally confirm the eligibility of their project by scheduling an informal consultation with the CRI before completing an EOI. EOI submissions are due January 16, 2024.
Eligible EOIs will be invited to the second step being the submission of a proposal intended to present the project in more detail and allow the interdepartmental DG-level CRI Steering Committee to confirm the project’s eligibility and rank the project using the assessment criteria.
Eligible EOIs will be invited to the second step being the submission of a proposal intended to present the project in more detail and allow the interdepartmental DG-level CRI Steering Committee to confirm the project’s eligibility and rank the project using the assessment criteria.
|}
|-
!
==Step 3: Proposal Submission==
Successful EOI applicants will be invited to complete the second stage of the application process which is the submission of a full [[Images/a/a6/Proposal Template.docx|proposal]]. Before developing a proposal, applicants should obtain the support of their Director General or above. The CRI supports applicants throughout the proposal development process. Regulators should refer to the [[Images/6/6b/CRI Regulators' Experimentation Toolkit.pdf|Regulators’ Experimentation Toolkit]] to assist in identifying, designing, and carrying out regulatory experiments and sandboxes.
Proposals will be assessed, and final funding decisions will be determined by an interdepartmental Steering Committee, made up of representatives from TBS, Privy Council Office, Innovation Science and Economic Development, Transport Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Health Canada, and the Community of Federal Regulators.
|-
!
== Step 4: Funding Decision==
Funding will be available from April 2023 upon completion of a MOU with the successful applicant and TBS, and is made available on a cost recovery basis.
The department is responsible to forecast their expenses and include the spending schedule in the MOU. The department will be expected to submit scheduled invoices to TBS to recover the expenses incurred as well as submitting financial forecast to allow TBS to decommit the funds that the department no longer plans on recovering.
|-
!
==Application Documents==
*REEF Guide
*[[Images/6/6b/CRI Regulators' Experimentation Toolkit.pdf|Regulators’ Experimentation Toolkit]]
*Expression of Interest (EOI) Template
* Proposal Template
|}
<span style="color: #1F402B"><big>'''Contact us'''</big></span> <br>
<span style="color: #1F402B"><big>'''Contact us'''</big></span> <br>
For additional information about this funding opportunity, including any assistance required to complete the application process, please contact the [mailto:cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca?Subject=Regulatory%20Experimentation%20Expense%20Fund%20Enquiry&body=%20 <u>Centre for Regulatory Innovation</u>].
For additional information about this funding opportunity, including any assistance required to complete the application process, please contact the [mailto:cri-cir@tbs-sct.gc.ca?Subject=Regulatory%20Experimentation%20Expense%20Fund%20Enquiry&body=%20 <u>Centre for Regulatory Innovation</u>].
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+
===Regulatory Experimentation Expense Fund Ongoing Projects===
! colspan="3" |REEF Ongoing Projects
|-
| colspan="3" |[[CRI Supported Projects|Click here to see a list of the CRI’s '''completed''' '''projects''' and experimentation reports]])
|-
|-
|'''Department/ Agency '''
|'''Project Title '''
|'''Project Description'''
|-
|-
|Transport Canada (TC)
|Transport Canada (TC)
|Light Sport Aircraft
|Light Sport Aircraft
| This experiment as proposed by TC involves setting up a sandbox to determine if Light Sport Aircraft, with appropriate conditions, are as reliable as other aircraft currently being used for the purpose of flight training and if the quality of training is as good, or better, than other aircraft currently used for pilot training. The experiment will also inform Transport Canada on potential additional conditions/measures that should be included in future exemptions or regulatory amendments.
|This experiment as proposed by TC involves setting up a sandbox to determine if Light Sport Aircraft, with appropriate conditions, are as reliable as other aircraft currently being used for the purpose of flight training and if the quality of training is as good, or better, than other aircraft currently used for pilot training. The experiment will also inform Transport Canada on potential additional conditions/measures that should be included in future exemptions or regulatory amendments.
|- bgcolor="#ffdead"
|-
|Innovation Science and Economic Development (ISED) – Standards Council of Canada (SCC)
|Innovation Science and Economic Development (ISED) – Standards Council of Canada (SCC)
|Piloting an Accreditation Program for the Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS)
| Piloting an Accreditation Program for the Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS)
|The purpose of this experiment is to pilot a prototype accreditation program to understand whether the main SCC Requirements and Guidance document that works in conjunction with ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Conformity assessment is clear and appropriate and obtain feedback from the certification bodies and Artificial Intelligence (AI) companies about the program. This information is necessary to improve and refine the prototype.
|The purpose of this experiment is to pilot a prototype accreditation program to understand whether the main SCC Requirements and Guidance document that works in conjunction with ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Conformity assessment is clear and appropriate and obtain feedback from the certification bodies and Artificial Intelligence (AI) companies about the program. This information is necessary to improve and refine the prototype.
The SCC is also looking to gather information on whether the AIMS could have an impact on the level of risk of AI products to inform potential use of AIMS for regulators.
The SCC is also looking to gather information on whether the AIMS could have an impact on the level of risk of AI products to inform potential use of AIMS for regulators.
|-
| Transport Canada (TC)
| Aviation E-Licensing Pilot
| This is a follow up to previous experiment to test a new QR code prototype with pilots of an air operator within Canada for effectiveness. The sandbox experiment will test if the digital solution lowers the cost of compliance and improve compliance with respect to air operators’ obligation to track employee compliance with licensing requirements.
|-
|-
| Health Canada (HC)
|Machine Learning Enabled Medical Device (MLMD) Sandbox Development
|Health Canada is developing a sandbox to test new regulatory approach for MLMDs. Currently, MLMD can be marketed in Canada if the device algorithm behaviour is locked to remain the same overtime as what was presented in the product’s market authorization application. Any change to the algorithm behaviour requires the submission of an amendment to the licence. Health Canada wants to test a new regulatory approach that would use a different method of risk management than requiring a licence amendment so that the device can change its behaviour over time as it learns from new data it acquires over time. The current project scope is limited to accessing the legislative authorities to establish the sandbox and developing the sandbox application scheme.
|Health Canada (HC)
|Machine Learning Enabled Medical Device (MLMD) Sandbox Development
|Health Canada is developing a sandbox to test new regulatory approach for MLMDs. Currently, MLMD can be marketed in Canada if the device algorithm behaviour is locked to remain the same overtime as what was presented in the product’s market authorization application. Any change to the algorithm behaviour requires the submission of an amendment to the licence. Health Canada wants to test a new regulatory approach that would use a different method of risk management than requiring a licence amendment so that the device can change its behaviour over time as it learns from new data it acquires over time. The current project scope is limited to accessing the legislative authorities to establish the sandbox and developing the sandbox application scheme.
|}
|}