Case study: International Assistance Review - Revision history

Wendy.liao at 13:25, 9 May 2019

2019-05-09T13:25:56Z

Zaria.channer at 17:29, 25 March 2019

2019-03-25T17:29:58Z

Zaria.channer: /* Download */

2019-03-25T17:29:44Z

Download

Zaria.channer: /* Download this Case study */

2019-03-25T17:29:24Z

Download this Case study

Zaria.channer at 17:21, 25 March 2019

2019-03-25T17:21:28Z

Zaria.channer: /* Download this Case study */

2019-03-25T17:20:30Z

Download this Case study

Zaria.channer: /* Download this Case study */

2019-03-25T17:20:15Z

Download this Case study

Zaria.channer at 17:19, 25 March 2019

2019-03-25T17:19:59Z

Zaria.channer at 16:00, 18 March 2019

2019-03-18T16:00:21Z

Zaria.channer at 15:59, 18 March 2019

2019-03-18T15:59:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:25, 9 May 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[FR: Étude de cas: Examen de l'aide internationale]]		[[FR: Étude de cas: Examen de l'aide internationale]]
		+
		+	< [[Public Engagement Case Studies]]

	===Overview===		===Overview===

@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 In order to communicate back with participants and stakeholders, a “what we heard” report was made publicly available on the Global Affairs website, in full HTML format. The team took a digital first approach, creating a clickable website rather than a downloadable report.
-====Download====
+===Download===
 Access the English version of this case study here : [[Media:Case study - International Assistance Review - EN.pdf|International Assistance Review - PDF]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:29, 25 March 2019
Line 56:		Line 56:

	====Download====		====Download====
−	Access the ~~PDF~~ version of this case study here : [[Media:Case study - International Assistance Review - EN.pdf\|International Assistance Review - PDF]]	+	Access the English version of this case study here : [[Media:Case study - International Assistance Review - EN.pdf\|International Assistance Review - PDF]]

@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 In order to communicate back with participants and stakeholders, a “what we heard” report was made publicly available on the Global Affairs website, in full HTML format. The team took a digital first approach, creating a clickable website rather than a downloadable report.
-====Download this Case study====
+====Download====
-Access the PDF version of the case study here : [[Media:Case study - International Assistance Review - EN.pdf|International Assistance Review - PDF]]
+Access the PDF version of this case study here : [[Media:Case study - International Assistance Review - EN.pdf|International Assistance Review - PDF]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:21, 25 March 2019
Line 56:		Line 56:

	====Download this Case study====		====Download this Case study====
−	Access the PDF version of the case study here : [[~~File~~:Case study - International Assistance Review - EN.pdf~~\|200px\|thumb\|left~~\|International Assistance Review EN - PDF]]	+	Access the PDF version of the case study here : [[Media:Case study - International Assistance Review - EN.pdf\|International Assistance Review - PDF]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 25 March 2019
Line 56:		Line 56:

	====Download this Case study====		====Download this Case study====
−	Access the PDF version of the case study here : [[File:Case study - International Assistance Review - EN.pdf\|200px\|thumb\|left\|International Assistance Review EN - PDF]	+	Access the PDF version of the case study here : [[File:Case study - International Assistance Review - EN.pdf\|200px\|thumb\|left\|International Assistance Review EN - PDF]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:19, 25 March 2019
Line 54:		Line 54:
	===Communicating back===		===Communicating back===
	In order to communicate back with participants and stakeholders, a “what we heard” report was made publicly available on the Global Affairs website, in full HTML format. The team took a digital first approach, creating a clickable website rather than a downloadable report.		In order to communicate back with participants and stakeholders, a “what we heard” report was made publicly available on the Global Affairs website, in full HTML format. The team took a digital first approach, creating a clickable website rather than a downloadable report.
		+
		+	====Download this Case study====
		+	Access the PDF version of the case study here : [[File:Case study - International Assistance Review - EN.pdf \|200px\|thumb\|left\|International Assistance Review EN - PDF]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[FR: Étude de cas: Examen de l'aide internationale]]
 ===Overview===
 The renewal of the International Assistance Policy was highly anticipated by national and international stakeholders. The engagement team at Global Affairs Canada (“the team”) were able to leverage this enthusiasm and desire to participate. They collected feedback from an extensive range of stakeholders, from international government partners to users of Canadian foreign aid. They used a mix of methods, which included radio consultations with rural Tanzanians, an often hard-to-reach group. All the information and feedback received were analyzed in house. This ensured that the lessons learned and intelligence gleaned through the engagement process remained within the organization.
 ===History===
 ====Introduction====

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 |}
-<table border="1" width="100%">
+===Engagement===
-	<col style="width:25%">
+Consultation staff said that a major factor in the success of the consultation was the tremendous enthusiasm of external partners and stakeholders and their desire to contribute to updating the International Assistance Policy.  Overall, international and national partners received the engagement very positively.
-	<col style="width:50%">
-	<thead>
+===Analysis===
-	<tr>
+The team received 10,600 online and in-person (transcribed) submissions. Stakeholders could also send in written comments by regular mail. A dedicated inbox was established and submissions were transferred to the central Excel file in Global Affair’s records management system. Once the team collected and organized all feedback, it set up thematic task teams to do a more in-depth analysis and breakdown of submissions. The teams conducted an initial review of the submissions, and then categorized them by theme for further analysis, classification and content breakdown.
-		<th>Methods</th>
-		<th>Tools </th>
+Consultations with multiple cross-cutting subject areas require significant oversight to avoid siloing and to develop cohesive products and policies. In the context of the International Assistance Policy review, the management team worked closely with the thematic analysis teams to provide coordinated support.
-		</tr>
-	</thead>
+===Communicating back===
-	<tbody>
+In order to communicate back with participants and stakeholders, a “what we heard” report was made publicly available on the Global Affairs website, in full HTML format. The team took a digital first approach, creating a clickable website rather than a downloadable report.